Cargando…

Accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the accuracy and stability of arterial blood gas (ABG) results by comparison with venous measurements from routine blood tests, and to compare the accuracy and performance of two sampling syringes, pre‐heparinized syringe (PHS) and disposable arterial blood syringe (DABS), in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xiexiong, Liu, Tao, Huang, Miao, Li, Ruixuan, Zeng, Jianwei, Li, Yihui, Fu, Ru, Li, Xiaogang, Jiang, Weihong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24736
_version_ 1784839631700754432
author Zhao, Xiexiong
Liu, Tao
Huang, Miao
Li, Ruixuan
Zeng, Jianwei
Li, Yihui
Fu, Ru
Li, Xiaogang
Jiang, Weihong
author_facet Zhao, Xiexiong
Liu, Tao
Huang, Miao
Li, Ruixuan
Zeng, Jianwei
Li, Yihui
Fu, Ru
Li, Xiaogang
Jiang, Weihong
author_sort Zhao, Xiexiong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the accuracy and stability of arterial blood gas (ABG) results by comparison with venous measurements from routine blood tests, and to compare the accuracy and performance of two sampling syringes, pre‐heparinized syringe (PHS) and disposable arterial blood syringe (DABS), in ABG analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the practical use of PHS and DABS in collecting ABG samples, involving 500 and 400 patients, respectively. For each patient, in addition to the ABG sample, a venous blood sample was also collected using a venous blood collection tube (VBCT) and used for routine blood tests. Accordingly, patients were referred to as the PHS + VBCT group and DABS + VBCT group. The correlation between arterial and venous values of each blood parameter in each group was evaluated using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland–Altman was performed to evaluate the agreement between arterial and venous values and compare the performance of PHS and DABS in ABG sample collection. RESULTS: In the PHS + VBCT group, arterial K(+), Na(+), hemoglobin (Hb), and hematocrit (HCT) were 0.32 mmol/L, 2.90 mmol/L, 2.21 g/L, and 1.27% significantly lower their corresponding venous values while arterial Cl(−) was 7.60 mmol/L significantly higher than venous Cl(−). In the DABS + VBCT group, arterial K(+) and Na(+) were 0.20 mmol/L and 1.19 mmol/L significantly lower while Cl(−) and HCT in arterial blood were 5.34 mmol/L and 0.66% significantly higher than their corresponding venous values. In both groups, arterial K(+), Na(+), Hb, and HCT values were highly consistent with their corresponding venous values, with all ICCs greater than 0.70, especially Hb and HCT. Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that arterial K(+) and Na(+) were more consistent with venous counterparts in the DABS + VBCT group, with a narrower 95% limits of agreement than the PHS + VBCT group (K(+), −0.7‐0.3 mmol/L vs. −1.1 to 0.5 mmol/L; Na(+), −5.8 to 3.4 mmol/L vs. −8.2 to 2.4 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: Arterial blood gas analysis of K(+), Na(+), Hb, and HCT using PHS or DABS for blood sampling is accurate and stable, especially DABS, which can provide clinicians with fast and reliable blood gas results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9701850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97018502022-11-28 Accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients: A retrospective study Zhao, Xiexiong Liu, Tao Huang, Miao Li, Ruixuan Zeng, Jianwei Li, Yihui Fu, Ru Li, Xiaogang Jiang, Weihong J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: To evaluate the accuracy and stability of arterial blood gas (ABG) results by comparison with venous measurements from routine blood tests, and to compare the accuracy and performance of two sampling syringes, pre‐heparinized syringe (PHS) and disposable arterial blood syringe (DABS), in ABG analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the practical use of PHS and DABS in collecting ABG samples, involving 500 and 400 patients, respectively. For each patient, in addition to the ABG sample, a venous blood sample was also collected using a venous blood collection tube (VBCT) and used for routine blood tests. Accordingly, patients were referred to as the PHS + VBCT group and DABS + VBCT group. The correlation between arterial and venous values of each blood parameter in each group was evaluated using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland–Altman was performed to evaluate the agreement between arterial and venous values and compare the performance of PHS and DABS in ABG sample collection. RESULTS: In the PHS + VBCT group, arterial K(+), Na(+), hemoglobin (Hb), and hematocrit (HCT) were 0.32 mmol/L, 2.90 mmol/L, 2.21 g/L, and 1.27% significantly lower their corresponding venous values while arterial Cl(−) was 7.60 mmol/L significantly higher than venous Cl(−). In the DABS + VBCT group, arterial K(+) and Na(+) were 0.20 mmol/L and 1.19 mmol/L significantly lower while Cl(−) and HCT in arterial blood were 5.34 mmol/L and 0.66% significantly higher than their corresponding venous values. In both groups, arterial K(+), Na(+), Hb, and HCT values were highly consistent with their corresponding venous values, with all ICCs greater than 0.70, especially Hb and HCT. Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that arterial K(+) and Na(+) were more consistent with venous counterparts in the DABS + VBCT group, with a narrower 95% limits of agreement than the PHS + VBCT group (K(+), −0.7‐0.3 mmol/L vs. −1.1 to 0.5 mmol/L; Na(+), −5.8 to 3.4 mmol/L vs. −8.2 to 2.4 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: Arterial blood gas analysis of K(+), Na(+), Hb, and HCT using PHS or DABS for blood sampling is accurate and stable, especially DABS, which can provide clinicians with fast and reliable blood gas results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9701850/ /pubmed/36250221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24736 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Zhao, Xiexiong
Liu, Tao
Huang, Miao
Li, Ruixuan
Zeng, Jianwei
Li, Yihui
Fu, Ru
Li, Xiaogang
Jiang, Weihong
Accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients: A retrospective study
title Accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients: A retrospective study
title_full Accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients: A retrospective study
title_fullStr Accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients: A retrospective study
title_short Accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients: A retrospective study
title_sort accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients: a retrospective study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24736
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxiexiong accuracyandstabilityevaluationofdifferentbloodsamplingmethodsinbloodgasanalysisinemergencypatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT liutao accuracyandstabilityevaluationofdifferentbloodsamplingmethodsinbloodgasanalysisinemergencypatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT huangmiao accuracyandstabilityevaluationofdifferentbloodsamplingmethodsinbloodgasanalysisinemergencypatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT liruixuan accuracyandstabilityevaluationofdifferentbloodsamplingmethodsinbloodgasanalysisinemergencypatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT zengjianwei accuracyandstabilityevaluationofdifferentbloodsamplingmethodsinbloodgasanalysisinemergencypatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT liyihui accuracyandstabilityevaluationofdifferentbloodsamplingmethodsinbloodgasanalysisinemergencypatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT furu accuracyandstabilityevaluationofdifferentbloodsamplingmethodsinbloodgasanalysisinemergencypatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT lixiaogang accuracyandstabilityevaluationofdifferentbloodsamplingmethodsinbloodgasanalysisinemergencypatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT jiangweihong accuracyandstabilityevaluationofdifferentbloodsamplingmethodsinbloodgasanalysisinemergencypatientsaretrospectivestudy