Cargando…

Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity: A Qualitative Study of Understanding, Consequences, and Impact

BACKGROUND: Academic integrity (AI) is of increasing importance in higher education. At the same time, students are becoming more consumer-oriented and more inclined to appeal against, or complain about, a penalty imposed for a breach of AI. This combination of factors places pressure on institution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stone, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09461-5
_version_ 1784839721729392640
author Stone, Anna
author_facet Stone, Anna
author_sort Stone, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Academic integrity (AI) is of increasing importance in higher education. At the same time, students are becoming more consumer-oriented and more inclined to appeal against, or complain about, a penalty imposed for a breach of AI. This combination of factors places pressure on institutions of higher education to handle alleged breaches of AI in a way acceptable to students that motivates them to continue to engage with their studies. METHOD: Students (n = 8) were interviewed to discover their perceptions of the process for dealing with breaches of AI. All students were based in one university in a very diverse area of London which has many first-generation students from non-traditional academic backgrounds. RESULTS: Students reported strong emotional reactions featuring high levels of anxiety and stress. Some found the process to be threatening and demotivating and questioned continuation on their course of study, while others used more adaptive coping strategies. Students also went to great pains to make it clear that their own, and their friends’, breaches of AI were unintentional, while expressing the view that other people were deliberately cheating and should be penalised. Key recommendations include: support for students to re-engage after the intervention; support for students to develop effective self-regulatory learning strategies and time management; provision of specific examples to clarify what is, and is not, acceptable academic practice; recognition of the strong emotions likely to be invoked, especially if accompanied by declarations of unintentionality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9702763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97027632022-11-28 Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity: A Qualitative Study of Understanding, Consequences, and Impact Stone, Anna J Acad Ethics Article BACKGROUND: Academic integrity (AI) is of increasing importance in higher education. At the same time, students are becoming more consumer-oriented and more inclined to appeal against, or complain about, a penalty imposed for a breach of AI. This combination of factors places pressure on institutions of higher education to handle alleged breaches of AI in a way acceptable to students that motivates them to continue to engage with their studies. METHOD: Students (n = 8) were interviewed to discover their perceptions of the process for dealing with breaches of AI. All students were based in one university in a very diverse area of London which has many first-generation students from non-traditional academic backgrounds. RESULTS: Students reported strong emotional reactions featuring high levels of anxiety and stress. Some found the process to be threatening and demotivating and questioned continuation on their course of study, while others used more adaptive coping strategies. Students also went to great pains to make it clear that their own, and their friends’, breaches of AI were unintentional, while expressing the view that other people were deliberately cheating and should be penalised. Key recommendations include: support for students to re-engage after the intervention; support for students to develop effective self-regulatory learning strategies and time management; provision of specific examples to clarify what is, and is not, acceptable academic practice; recognition of the strong emotions likely to be invoked, especially if accompanied by declarations of unintentionality. Springer Netherlands 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9702763/ /pubmed/36466717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09461-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Stone, Anna
Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity: A Qualitative Study of Understanding, Consequences, and Impact
title Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity: A Qualitative Study of Understanding, Consequences, and Impact
title_full Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity: A Qualitative Study of Understanding, Consequences, and Impact
title_fullStr Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity: A Qualitative Study of Understanding, Consequences, and Impact
title_full_unstemmed Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity: A Qualitative Study of Understanding, Consequences, and Impact
title_short Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity: A Qualitative Study of Understanding, Consequences, and Impact
title_sort student perceptions of academic integrity: a qualitative study of understanding, consequences, and impact
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09461-5
work_keys_str_mv AT stoneanna studentperceptionsofacademicintegrityaqualitativestudyofunderstandingconsequencesandimpact