Cargando…

Rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a Norwegian multiple sclerosis population

INTRODUCTION: No evidence of disease activity with three components (NEDA-3) is achieved if the person with MS (pwMS) has no new MRI lesions, no new relapses and no change in Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) over 1 year. Whether NEDA-3 is a good tool in measuring disease activity is up for di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simonsen, Cecilia Smith, Flemmen, Heidi Øyen, Broch, Line, Brekke, Kamilla, Brunborg, Cathrine, Berg-Hansen, Pål, Celius, Elisabeth Gulowsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36452173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1034056
_version_ 1784839732157480960
author Simonsen, Cecilia Smith
Flemmen, Heidi Øyen
Broch, Line
Brekke, Kamilla
Brunborg, Cathrine
Berg-Hansen, Pål
Celius, Elisabeth Gulowsen
author_facet Simonsen, Cecilia Smith
Flemmen, Heidi Øyen
Broch, Line
Brekke, Kamilla
Brunborg, Cathrine
Berg-Hansen, Pål
Celius, Elisabeth Gulowsen
author_sort Simonsen, Cecilia Smith
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: No evidence of disease activity with three components (NEDA-3) is achieved if the person with MS (pwMS) has no new MRI lesions, no new relapses and no change in Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) over 1 year. Whether NEDA-3 is a good tool in measuring disease activity is up for discussion, but it is superior to the individual parameters separately and user-friendly. There is disagreement on whether NEDA-3 is a good predictor of long-term disability. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using real-world data with limited selection bias from the complete MS population at two hospitals in the southeast of Norway. We included pwMS diagnosed between 2006 and 2017 who had enough information to determine time to failure of NEDA-3 after diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 536 pwMS, only 38% achieved NEDA 1 year after diagnosis. PwMS achieving NEDA were more likely to be started on a high efficacy drug as the initial drug, but there were no demographic differences. Mean time to NEDA failure was 3.3 (95% CI 2.9–3.7) years. Starting a high efficiacy therapy was associated with an increased risk of sustaining NEDA as compared to those receiving moderate efficacy therapy. PwMS who achieved NEDA at year one had a mean time to EDSS 6 of 33.8 (95% CI 30.9–36.8) years vs. 30.8 (95% CI 25.0–36.6) years in pwMS who did not achieve NEDA, p < 0.001. When rebaselining NEDA 1 year after diagnosis, 52.2% achieved NEDA in the 1st year after rebaseline, mean time to NEDA failure was 3.4 (95% CI 3.0–3.7) years and mean time to EDSS 6 was 44.5 (95% CI 40.4–48.5) years in pwMS achieving NEDA vs. 29.6 (95% CI 24.2–35.0) years in pwMS not achieving NEDA, p < 0.001. After rebaseline, pwMS with a high efficacy therapy as the initial drug had a mean time from diagnosis to NEDA fail of 4.8 years (95% CI 3.9–5.8) vs. 3.1 years (95% CI 2.7–3.5) in pwMS started on a moderate efficacy therapy, p < 0.001. In pwMS with NEDA failure at year one, 70% failed one, 28% failed two and 2% failed three components. New MRI lesions were the most common cause of NEDA failure (63%), followed by new relapses (50%) and EDSS change (25%). CONCLUSION: NEDA-3 from rebaseline after 1 year, once treatment is stabilized, can predict the long-term disease course in MS. Starting a high efficacy DMT is associated with longer time to NEDA failure than moderate therapies. Finally, most pwMS only fail one component and new MRI lesions are the most likely cause of NEDA failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9702815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97028152022-11-29 Rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a Norwegian multiple sclerosis population Simonsen, Cecilia Smith Flemmen, Heidi Øyen Broch, Line Brekke, Kamilla Brunborg, Cathrine Berg-Hansen, Pål Celius, Elisabeth Gulowsen Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION: No evidence of disease activity with three components (NEDA-3) is achieved if the person with MS (pwMS) has no new MRI lesions, no new relapses and no change in Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) over 1 year. Whether NEDA-3 is a good tool in measuring disease activity is up for discussion, but it is superior to the individual parameters separately and user-friendly. There is disagreement on whether NEDA-3 is a good predictor of long-term disability. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using real-world data with limited selection bias from the complete MS population at two hospitals in the southeast of Norway. We included pwMS diagnosed between 2006 and 2017 who had enough information to determine time to failure of NEDA-3 after diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 536 pwMS, only 38% achieved NEDA 1 year after diagnosis. PwMS achieving NEDA were more likely to be started on a high efficacy drug as the initial drug, but there were no demographic differences. Mean time to NEDA failure was 3.3 (95% CI 2.9–3.7) years. Starting a high efficiacy therapy was associated with an increased risk of sustaining NEDA as compared to those receiving moderate efficacy therapy. PwMS who achieved NEDA at year one had a mean time to EDSS 6 of 33.8 (95% CI 30.9–36.8) years vs. 30.8 (95% CI 25.0–36.6) years in pwMS who did not achieve NEDA, p < 0.001. When rebaselining NEDA 1 year after diagnosis, 52.2% achieved NEDA in the 1st year after rebaseline, mean time to NEDA failure was 3.4 (95% CI 3.0–3.7) years and mean time to EDSS 6 was 44.5 (95% CI 40.4–48.5) years in pwMS achieving NEDA vs. 29.6 (95% CI 24.2–35.0) years in pwMS not achieving NEDA, p < 0.001. After rebaseline, pwMS with a high efficacy therapy as the initial drug had a mean time from diagnosis to NEDA fail of 4.8 years (95% CI 3.9–5.8) vs. 3.1 years (95% CI 2.7–3.5) in pwMS started on a moderate efficacy therapy, p < 0.001. In pwMS with NEDA failure at year one, 70% failed one, 28% failed two and 2% failed three components. New MRI lesions were the most common cause of NEDA failure (63%), followed by new relapses (50%) and EDSS change (25%). CONCLUSION: NEDA-3 from rebaseline after 1 year, once treatment is stabilized, can predict the long-term disease course in MS. Starting a high efficacy DMT is associated with longer time to NEDA failure than moderate therapies. Finally, most pwMS only fail one component and new MRI lesions are the most likely cause of NEDA failure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9702815/ /pubmed/36452173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1034056 Text en Copyright © 2022 Simonsen, Flemmen, Broch, Brekke, Brunborg, Berg-Hansen and Celius. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Simonsen, Cecilia Smith
Flemmen, Heidi Øyen
Broch, Line
Brekke, Kamilla
Brunborg, Cathrine
Berg-Hansen, Pål
Celius, Elisabeth Gulowsen
Rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a Norwegian multiple sclerosis population
title Rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a Norwegian multiple sclerosis population
title_full Rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a Norwegian multiple sclerosis population
title_fullStr Rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a Norwegian multiple sclerosis population
title_full_unstemmed Rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a Norwegian multiple sclerosis population
title_short Rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a Norwegian multiple sclerosis population
title_sort rebaseline no evidence of disease activity (neda-3) as a predictor of long-term disease course in a norwegian multiple sclerosis population
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36452173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1034056
work_keys_str_mv AT simonsenceciliasmith rebaselinenoevidenceofdiseaseactivityneda3asapredictoroflongtermdiseasecourseinanorwegianmultiplesclerosispopulation
AT flemmenheidiøyen rebaselinenoevidenceofdiseaseactivityneda3asapredictoroflongtermdiseasecourseinanorwegianmultiplesclerosispopulation
AT brochline rebaselinenoevidenceofdiseaseactivityneda3asapredictoroflongtermdiseasecourseinanorwegianmultiplesclerosispopulation
AT brekkekamilla rebaselinenoevidenceofdiseaseactivityneda3asapredictoroflongtermdiseasecourseinanorwegianmultiplesclerosispopulation
AT brunborgcathrine rebaselinenoevidenceofdiseaseactivityneda3asapredictoroflongtermdiseasecourseinanorwegianmultiplesclerosispopulation
AT berghansenpal rebaselinenoevidenceofdiseaseactivityneda3asapredictoroflongtermdiseasecourseinanorwegianmultiplesclerosispopulation
AT celiuselisabethgulowsen rebaselinenoevidenceofdiseaseactivityneda3asapredictoroflongtermdiseasecourseinanorwegianmultiplesclerosispopulation