Cargando…
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a well-established role in revascularization for coronary artery disease. We performed network meta-analysis to provide evidence on optimal intervention strategies for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enrolled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833 |
_version_ | 1784839733959983104 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Wen-Rui Chandrasekharan, Karthik H. Nai, Chang-Sheng Zhu, Yong-Xiang Iqbal, Javaid Chang, Shang Cheng, You-Wei Wang, Xin-Yu Bourantas, Christos V. Zhang, Yao-Jun |
author_facet | Ma, Wen-Rui Chandrasekharan, Karthik H. Nai, Chang-Sheng Zhu, Yong-Xiang Iqbal, Javaid Chang, Shang Cheng, You-Wei Wang, Xin-Yu Bourantas, Christos V. Zhang, Yao-Jun |
author_sort | Ma, Wen-Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a well-established role in revascularization for coronary artery disease. We performed network meta-analysis to provide evidence on optimal intervention strategies for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enrolled studies were randomized clinical trials that compared different intervention strategies [balloon angioplasty (BA), biolimus-coated balloon (BCB), bare-metal stent (BMS), new-generation drug-eluting stent (New-DES), older generation sirolimus-eluting stent (Old-SES), paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB), and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES)] for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 23 randomized clinical trials comparing seven intervention devices were analyzed. In terms of the primary outcome, New-DES was the intervention device with the best efficacy [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 89.1%; mean rank, 1.7], and the Old-SES [risk ratio (RR), 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–2.64] and PCB (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.72–2.74) secondary to New-DES, but there was no statistically significant difference between these three intervention devices. All DES and PCB were superior to BMS and BA for MACE in both primary and sensitivity analysis. For secondary outcomes, there was no association between all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) with any intervention strategy, and additionally, the findings of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were similar to the primary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel-coated balloon yielded similar outcomes to New-DES for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. Therefore, this network meta-analysis may provide potential support for PCB as a feasible, effective, and safe alternative intervention strategy for the revascularization of small coronary arteries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails], identifier [CRD42022338433]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9702822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97028222022-11-29 Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Ma, Wen-Rui Chandrasekharan, Karthik H. Nai, Chang-Sheng Zhu, Yong-Xiang Iqbal, Javaid Chang, Shang Cheng, You-Wei Wang, Xin-Yu Bourantas, Christos V. Zhang, Yao-Jun Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a well-established role in revascularization for coronary artery disease. We performed network meta-analysis to provide evidence on optimal intervention strategies for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enrolled studies were randomized clinical trials that compared different intervention strategies [balloon angioplasty (BA), biolimus-coated balloon (BCB), bare-metal stent (BMS), new-generation drug-eluting stent (New-DES), older generation sirolimus-eluting stent (Old-SES), paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB), and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES)] for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 23 randomized clinical trials comparing seven intervention devices were analyzed. In terms of the primary outcome, New-DES was the intervention device with the best efficacy [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 89.1%; mean rank, 1.7], and the Old-SES [risk ratio (RR), 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–2.64] and PCB (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.72–2.74) secondary to New-DES, but there was no statistically significant difference between these three intervention devices. All DES and PCB were superior to BMS and BA for MACE in both primary and sensitivity analysis. For secondary outcomes, there was no association between all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) with any intervention strategy, and additionally, the findings of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were similar to the primary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel-coated balloon yielded similar outcomes to New-DES for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. Therefore, this network meta-analysis may provide potential support for PCB as a feasible, effective, and safe alternative intervention strategy for the revascularization of small coronary arteries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails], identifier [CRD42022338433]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9702822/ /pubmed/36451921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ma, Chandrasekharan, Nai, Zhu, Iqbal, Chang, Cheng, Wang, Bourantas and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Ma, Wen-Rui Chandrasekharan, Karthik H. Nai, Chang-Sheng Zhu, Yong-Xiang Iqbal, Javaid Chang, Shang Cheng, You-Wei Wang, Xin-Yu Bourantas, Christos V. Zhang, Yao-Jun Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mawenrui clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chandrasekharankarthikh clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT naichangsheng clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhuyongxiang clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT iqbaljavaid clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT changshang clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chengyouwei clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangxinyu clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT bourantaschristosv clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangyaojun clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |