Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a well-established role in revascularization for coronary artery disease. We performed network meta-analysis to provide evidence on optimal intervention strategies for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enrolled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Wen-Rui, Chandrasekharan, Karthik H., Nai, Chang-Sheng, Zhu, Yong-Xiang, Iqbal, Javaid, Chang, Shang, Cheng, You-Wei, Wang, Xin-Yu, Bourantas, Christos V., Zhang, Yao-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833
_version_ 1784839733959983104
author Ma, Wen-Rui
Chandrasekharan, Karthik H.
Nai, Chang-Sheng
Zhu, Yong-Xiang
Iqbal, Javaid
Chang, Shang
Cheng, You-Wei
Wang, Xin-Yu
Bourantas, Christos V.
Zhang, Yao-Jun
author_facet Ma, Wen-Rui
Chandrasekharan, Karthik H.
Nai, Chang-Sheng
Zhu, Yong-Xiang
Iqbal, Javaid
Chang, Shang
Cheng, You-Wei
Wang, Xin-Yu
Bourantas, Christos V.
Zhang, Yao-Jun
author_sort Ma, Wen-Rui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a well-established role in revascularization for coronary artery disease. We performed network meta-analysis to provide evidence on optimal intervention strategies for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enrolled studies were randomized clinical trials that compared different intervention strategies [balloon angioplasty (BA), biolimus-coated balloon (BCB), bare-metal stent (BMS), new-generation drug-eluting stent (New-DES), older generation sirolimus-eluting stent (Old-SES), paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB), and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES)] for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 23 randomized clinical trials comparing seven intervention devices were analyzed. In terms of the primary outcome, New-DES was the intervention device with the best efficacy [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 89.1%; mean rank, 1.7], and the Old-SES [risk ratio (RR), 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–2.64] and PCB (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.72–2.74) secondary to New-DES, but there was no statistically significant difference between these three intervention devices. All DES and PCB were superior to BMS and BA for MACE in both primary and sensitivity analysis. For secondary outcomes, there was no association between all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) with any intervention strategy, and additionally, the findings of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were similar to the primary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel-coated balloon yielded similar outcomes to New-DES for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. Therefore, this network meta-analysis may provide potential support for PCB as a feasible, effective, and safe alternative intervention strategy for the revascularization of small coronary arteries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails], identifier [CRD42022338433].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9702822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97028222022-11-29 Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Ma, Wen-Rui Chandrasekharan, Karthik H. Nai, Chang-Sheng Zhu, Yong-Xiang Iqbal, Javaid Chang, Shang Cheng, You-Wei Wang, Xin-Yu Bourantas, Christos V. Zhang, Yao-Jun Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a well-established role in revascularization for coronary artery disease. We performed network meta-analysis to provide evidence on optimal intervention strategies for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enrolled studies were randomized clinical trials that compared different intervention strategies [balloon angioplasty (BA), biolimus-coated balloon (BCB), bare-metal stent (BMS), new-generation drug-eluting stent (New-DES), older generation sirolimus-eluting stent (Old-SES), paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB), and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES)] for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 23 randomized clinical trials comparing seven intervention devices were analyzed. In terms of the primary outcome, New-DES was the intervention device with the best efficacy [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 89.1%; mean rank, 1.7], and the Old-SES [risk ratio (RR), 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–2.64] and PCB (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.72–2.74) secondary to New-DES, but there was no statistically significant difference between these three intervention devices. All DES and PCB were superior to BMS and BA for MACE in both primary and sensitivity analysis. For secondary outcomes, there was no association between all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) with any intervention strategy, and additionally, the findings of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were similar to the primary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel-coated balloon yielded similar outcomes to New-DES for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. Therefore, this network meta-analysis may provide potential support for PCB as a feasible, effective, and safe alternative intervention strategy for the revascularization of small coronary arteries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails], identifier [CRD42022338433]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9702822/ /pubmed/36451921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ma, Chandrasekharan, Nai, Zhu, Iqbal, Chang, Cheng, Wang, Bourantas and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Ma, Wen-Rui
Chandrasekharan, Karthik H.
Nai, Chang-Sheng
Zhu, Yong-Xiang
Iqbal, Javaid
Chang, Shang
Cheng, You-Wei
Wang, Xin-Yu
Bourantas, Christos V.
Zhang, Yao-Jun
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833
work_keys_str_mv AT mawenrui clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chandrasekharankarthikh clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT naichangsheng clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhuyongxiang clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT iqbaljavaid clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT changshang clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chengyouwei clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangxinyu clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT bourantaschristosv clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangyaojun clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis