Cargando…

Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis – A retrospective single center analysis

BACKGROUND: Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond to standard treatment with steroids and azathioprine. While the disease is usually fatal if untreated, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. Nevertheless, second-line treatment is necessary in approximately 20% o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolev, Mirjam, Diem, Stefan, Diem, Lara, Rodrigues, Susana G., Berzigotti, Annalisa, Stirnimann, Guido, Semmo, Nasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtauto.2022.100172
_version_ 1784839762867126272
author Kolev, Mirjam
Diem, Stefan
Diem, Lara
Rodrigues, Susana G.
Berzigotti, Annalisa
Stirnimann, Guido
Semmo, Nasser
author_facet Kolev, Mirjam
Diem, Stefan
Diem, Lara
Rodrigues, Susana G.
Berzigotti, Annalisa
Stirnimann, Guido
Semmo, Nasser
author_sort Kolev, Mirjam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond to standard treatment with steroids and azathioprine. While the disease is usually fatal if untreated, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. Nevertheless, second-line treatment is necessary in approximately 20% of patients, due to either intolerance or insufficient response to first line treatment. While data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients intolerant to azathioprine is encouraging, MMF seems of less benefit in patients with insufficient response to first line treatment, but analyzed data on this issue is limited. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF as a second-line therapy in patients with AIH. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a monocentric database of AIH patients who received medical care from 2000 to 2022. Clinical, immunological and biochemical parameters were assessed at different time points including last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 144 patients with AIH were identified. Fifty out of 144 (35%) AIH patients received MMF. Forty (80%) received MMF due to first line treatment intolerance, while ten (20%) due to insufficient response to first line treatment. Remission with MMF monotherapy was 81.5% in the intolerance group versus 30% in the insufficient response group. Patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response, more often needed additional prednisolone doses higher than 5 mg/day, a switch to third-line treatment or combination regiments, to achieve disease control. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with MMF because of intolerance to first line treatment show a good disease control under MMF in the majority of cases. Efficacy is considerably lower in the patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response to first line treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9702977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97029772022-11-29 Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis – A retrospective single center analysis Kolev, Mirjam Diem, Stefan Diem, Lara Rodrigues, Susana G. Berzigotti, Annalisa Stirnimann, Guido Semmo, Nasser J Transl Autoimmun VSI:Autoantibodies in disease BACKGROUND: Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond to standard treatment with steroids and azathioprine. While the disease is usually fatal if untreated, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. Nevertheless, second-line treatment is necessary in approximately 20% of patients, due to either intolerance or insufficient response to first line treatment. While data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients intolerant to azathioprine is encouraging, MMF seems of less benefit in patients with insufficient response to first line treatment, but analyzed data on this issue is limited. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF as a second-line therapy in patients with AIH. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a monocentric database of AIH patients who received medical care from 2000 to 2022. Clinical, immunological and biochemical parameters were assessed at different time points including last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 144 patients with AIH were identified. Fifty out of 144 (35%) AIH patients received MMF. Forty (80%) received MMF due to first line treatment intolerance, while ten (20%) due to insufficient response to first line treatment. Remission with MMF monotherapy was 81.5% in the intolerance group versus 30% in the insufficient response group. Patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response, more often needed additional prednisolone doses higher than 5 mg/day, a switch to third-line treatment or combination regiments, to achieve disease control. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with MMF because of intolerance to first line treatment show a good disease control under MMF in the majority of cases. Efficacy is considerably lower in the patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response to first line treatment. Elsevier 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9702977/ /pubmed/36451933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtauto.2022.100172 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle VSI:Autoantibodies in disease
Kolev, Mirjam
Diem, Stefan
Diem, Lara
Rodrigues, Susana G.
Berzigotti, Annalisa
Stirnimann, Guido
Semmo, Nasser
Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis – A retrospective single center analysis
title Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis – A retrospective single center analysis
title_full Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis – A retrospective single center analysis
title_fullStr Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis – A retrospective single center analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis – A retrospective single center analysis
title_short Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis – A retrospective single center analysis
title_sort mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis – a retrospective single center analysis
topic VSI:Autoantibodies in disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtauto.2022.100172
work_keys_str_mv AT kolevmirjam mycophenolatemofetilassecondlinetreatmentinautoimmunehepatitisaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT diemstefan mycophenolatemofetilassecondlinetreatmentinautoimmunehepatitisaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT diemlara mycophenolatemofetilassecondlinetreatmentinautoimmunehepatitisaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT rodriguessusanag mycophenolatemofetilassecondlinetreatmentinautoimmunehepatitisaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT berzigottiannalisa mycophenolatemofetilassecondlinetreatmentinautoimmunehepatitisaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT stirnimannguido mycophenolatemofetilassecondlinetreatmentinautoimmunehepatitisaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT semmonasser mycophenolatemofetilassecondlinetreatmentinautoimmunehepatitisaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis