Cargando…

Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography

BACKGROUND: For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing hepatectomy, insufficient remnant liver regenerative capacity can lead to liver failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for the preoperative prediction of liver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Tong, Li, Qian, Wei, Yi, Yao, Shan, Yuan, Yuan, Deng, Liping, Wu, Dongbo, Nie, Lisha, Wei, Xiaocheng, Tang, Hehan, Song, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465825
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-306
_version_ 1784839790625030144
author Zhang, Tong
Li, Qian
Wei, Yi
Yao, Shan
Yuan, Yuan
Deng, Liping
Wu, Dongbo
Nie, Lisha
Wei, Xiaocheng
Tang, Hehan
Song, Bin
author_facet Zhang, Tong
Li, Qian
Wei, Yi
Yao, Shan
Yuan, Yuan
Deng, Liping
Wu, Dongbo
Nie, Lisha
Wei, Xiaocheng
Tang, Hehan
Song, Bin
author_sort Zhang, Tong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing hepatectomy, insufficient remnant liver regenerative capacity can lead to liver failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for the preoperative prediction of liver regeneration in patients with HCC after partial hepatectomy (PH). METHODS: A total of 54 patients with HCC undergoing MRE prior to PH were retrospectively included. The total functional liver, volume of preoperative future liver remnant (LVpre), and volume of postoperative liver remnant (LVpost), respectively, were measured, and the regeneration index (RI) and parenchymal hepatic resection rate (PHRR) were manually calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with a high RI, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the liver stiffness (LS) values. Patients were classified into three subgroups based on the value of PHRR: low PHRR (<30%), intermediate PHRR (30–50%), and high PHRR (>50%). Subsequently, Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between LS values and RI in the subgroups. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed a low LS value was associated with greater odds of a high RI [odds ratio (OR), 0.049; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.002 to 0.980]. An optimal cutoff value of 3.30 kPa was used to divide all patients into a low RI group and a high RI group with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.767 to 0.996). A significant negative relationship between RI and LS values (r=−0.799; P<0.001) was observed in the intermediate PHRR subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The LS values based on MRE may serve as a potential preoperative predictor of liver regeneration for patients with HCC undergoing PH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97031072022-12-01 Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography Zhang, Tong Li, Qian Wei, Yi Yao, Shan Yuan, Yuan Deng, Liping Wu, Dongbo Nie, Lisha Wei, Xiaocheng Tang, Hehan Song, Bin Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing hepatectomy, insufficient remnant liver regenerative capacity can lead to liver failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for the preoperative prediction of liver regeneration in patients with HCC after partial hepatectomy (PH). METHODS: A total of 54 patients with HCC undergoing MRE prior to PH were retrospectively included. The total functional liver, volume of preoperative future liver remnant (LVpre), and volume of postoperative liver remnant (LVpost), respectively, were measured, and the regeneration index (RI) and parenchymal hepatic resection rate (PHRR) were manually calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with a high RI, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the liver stiffness (LS) values. Patients were classified into three subgroups based on the value of PHRR: low PHRR (<30%), intermediate PHRR (30–50%), and high PHRR (>50%). Subsequently, Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between LS values and RI in the subgroups. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed a low LS value was associated with greater odds of a high RI [odds ratio (OR), 0.049; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.002 to 0.980]. An optimal cutoff value of 3.30 kPa was used to divide all patients into a low RI group and a high RI group with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.767 to 0.996). A significant negative relationship between RI and LS values (r=−0.799; P<0.001) was observed in the intermediate PHRR subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The LS values based on MRE may serve as a potential preoperative predictor of liver regeneration for patients with HCC undergoing PH. AME Publishing Company 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9703107/ /pubmed/36465825 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-306 Text en 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Tong
Li, Qian
Wei, Yi
Yao, Shan
Yuan, Yuan
Deng, Liping
Wu, Dongbo
Nie, Lisha
Wei, Xiaocheng
Tang, Hehan
Song, Bin
Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography
title Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography
title_full Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography
title_fullStr Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography
title_short Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography
title_sort preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465825
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-306
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangtong preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT liqian preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT weiyi preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT yaoshan preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT yuanyuan preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT dengliping preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT wudongbo preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT nielisha preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT weixiaocheng preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT tanghehan preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography
AT songbin preoperativeevaluationofliverregenerationfollowinghepatectomyinhepatocellularcarcinomausingmagneticresonanceelastography