Does One Size Really Fit All? Morphometric Analysis of Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia in an Ethnic Indian Population and Correlation to the Sizing of Existing Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been proven to be a highly efficacious procedure for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis who have persistent symptoms not managed by conservative treatment. A large percentage of standard commercially available total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants are imported and designed based on morphometric data of Western populations, which are known to have a larger build compared to their Asian counterparts. Hence, these prostheses may sometimes not be the best fit for Indian patients. We conducted this study to examine the anthropometry of osteoarthritic knees of Indian patients, analyze anatomical differences between males and females, and compare these measurements with commercially available five TKA implants. Methods: Morphometric data were collected from 150 Indian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee using computed tomography (CT) scans. The mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) dimensions of the distal femur and proximal tibia were measured, and aspect ratios (ML/AP) were calculated. These measurements were correlated with current commercially available implant sizes. Results: We examined CT scans of 100 female and 50 male patients' knees with a combined average age of 58.2 ± 7.5 years. The mean mediolateral and anteroposterior dimensions of the distal femur for Indian knees were 74.5 ± 5.8 mm and 58.0 ± 4.2 mm, respectively, whereas for the proximal tibia, 69.1 ± 5.5 mm and 43.8 ± 3.6, respectively. The mean aspect ratio for the femur was 129.0 ± 6.0 and for the tibia was 158.1 ± 9.1. Male dimensions were found to be greater than female dimensions in all measured aspects of the distal femur and proximal tibia for the Indian population. However, the aspect ratio of the tibia was not found to vary with gender. When compared with the dimensions of other ethnic groups, the size of Indian knees was found to be smaller than Caucasians. Conclusions: There is a mismatch between the anatomy of Indian knees and currently available TKA implants, and these implants may have drawbacks when implanted in Indian patients. The obtained anthropometric data may provide useful directions for designing TKA implants of more suitable sizes and aspect ratios for Indian patients.