Cargando…

Evaluating the attitudes of mental health professionals towards trials of MDMA: a randomised vignette trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare attitudes of mental health (MH) professionals towards trials of methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AP), with a neutrally labelled pharmacotherapy trial. DESIGN: A randomised controlled vignette study design, with experimenters blinded to group condition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, Dean J, Colagiuri, Ben, Glozier, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060360
_version_ 1784839815739473920
author Wright, Dean J
Colagiuri, Ben
Glozier, Nick
author_facet Wright, Dean J
Colagiuri, Ben
Glozier, Nick
author_sort Wright, Dean J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare attitudes of mental health (MH) professionals towards trials of methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AP), with a neutrally labelled pharmacotherapy trial. DESIGN: A randomised controlled vignette study design, with experimenters blinded to group condition. SETTING: Participants were recruited online via professional societies. PARTICIPANTS: Psychiatrists, psychologists and MH researchers from across Australia. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to read a vignette about a trial of either MDMA-AP or a neutrally labelled pharmacotherapy. OUTCOMES: Comparison of the difference in four attitudes towards MDMA-AP and control: How likely they were to (1) recommend participating, or (2) object to participating in the trial; (3) their predicted efficacy; and (4) concerns about the safety of the trial. RESULTS: There were no overall differences between professional’s attitudes towards MDMA-AP (n=51) and the control pharmacotherapy (n=43) trial vignettes. Psychiatrists were less likely to recommend participation in the MDMA-AP than the control trial (d=0.72, p=0.02), but did not differ in other attitudes. Psychologists and researchers did not differ in any attitudes. The correlation between professional experience and both: (1) concern about, and (2) strength of objection to, the trial, was higher for MDMA-AP, than control (d=0.60, p=0.01 and d=0.40, p=0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatrists, but not psychologists or researchers showed more hesitancy in recommending trials of MDMA-AP versus an unknown pharmacotherapy. Experienced MH professionals were more likely to have negative views about MDMA-AP trials than less experienced MH professionals. This may reflect the experience of prior unfulfilled pharmacotherapy innovation or exuberance associated with fewer years of practice. Research into, and implementation of, MDMA-AP may face barriers with certain MH professionals, which will need be addressed if MDMA-AP continues to show promise as an efficacious treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study design was registered with the ANZCTR (ACTRN12620001068954).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97033082022-11-29 Evaluating the attitudes of mental health professionals towards trials of MDMA: a randomised vignette trial Wright, Dean J Colagiuri, Ben Glozier, Nick BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: To compare attitudes of mental health (MH) professionals towards trials of methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AP), with a neutrally labelled pharmacotherapy trial. DESIGN: A randomised controlled vignette study design, with experimenters blinded to group condition. SETTING: Participants were recruited online via professional societies. PARTICIPANTS: Psychiatrists, psychologists and MH researchers from across Australia. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to read a vignette about a trial of either MDMA-AP or a neutrally labelled pharmacotherapy. OUTCOMES: Comparison of the difference in four attitudes towards MDMA-AP and control: How likely they were to (1) recommend participating, or (2) object to participating in the trial; (3) their predicted efficacy; and (4) concerns about the safety of the trial. RESULTS: There were no overall differences between professional’s attitudes towards MDMA-AP (n=51) and the control pharmacotherapy (n=43) trial vignettes. Psychiatrists were less likely to recommend participation in the MDMA-AP than the control trial (d=0.72, p=0.02), but did not differ in other attitudes. Psychologists and researchers did not differ in any attitudes. The correlation between professional experience and both: (1) concern about, and (2) strength of objection to, the trial, was higher for MDMA-AP, than control (d=0.60, p=0.01 and d=0.40, p=0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatrists, but not psychologists or researchers showed more hesitancy in recommending trials of MDMA-AP versus an unknown pharmacotherapy. Experienced MH professionals were more likely to have negative views about MDMA-AP trials than less experienced MH professionals. This may reflect the experience of prior unfulfilled pharmacotherapy innovation or exuberance associated with fewer years of practice. Research into, and implementation of, MDMA-AP may face barriers with certain MH professionals, which will need be addressed if MDMA-AP continues to show promise as an efficacious treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study design was registered with the ANZCTR (ACTRN12620001068954). BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9703308/ /pubmed/36428011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060360 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Wright, Dean J
Colagiuri, Ben
Glozier, Nick
Evaluating the attitudes of mental health professionals towards trials of MDMA: a randomised vignette trial
title Evaluating the attitudes of mental health professionals towards trials of MDMA: a randomised vignette trial
title_full Evaluating the attitudes of mental health professionals towards trials of MDMA: a randomised vignette trial
title_fullStr Evaluating the attitudes of mental health professionals towards trials of MDMA: a randomised vignette trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the attitudes of mental health professionals towards trials of MDMA: a randomised vignette trial
title_short Evaluating the attitudes of mental health professionals towards trials of MDMA: a randomised vignette trial
title_sort evaluating the attitudes of mental health professionals towards trials of mdma: a randomised vignette trial
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060360
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightdeanj evaluatingtheattitudesofmentalhealthprofessionalstowardstrialsofmdmaarandomisedvignettetrial
AT colagiuriben evaluatingtheattitudesofmentalhealthprofessionalstowardstrialsofmdmaarandomisedvignettetrial
AT gloziernick evaluatingtheattitudesofmentalhealthprofessionalstowardstrialsofmdmaarandomisedvignettetrial