Cargando…

Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES: The administration of nursing assistants (NAs) is closely associated with patient outcomes, but studies evaluating intrahospital administration of NAs are limited. This study aimed to identify existing literature on intrahospital NAs’ administration approaches. DESIGN: Scoping review. DA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Ben-tuo, Jin, Yinghui, Cheng, Shu-dong, Ding, Yan-ming, Du, Ji-wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063100
_version_ 1784839816226013184
author Zeng, Ben-tuo
Jin, Yinghui
Cheng, Shu-dong
Ding, Yan-ming
Du, Ji-wei
author_facet Zeng, Ben-tuo
Jin, Yinghui
Cheng, Shu-dong
Ding, Yan-ming
Du, Ji-wei
author_sort Zeng, Ben-tuo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The administration of nursing assistants (NAs) is closely associated with patient outcomes, but studies evaluating intrahospital administration of NAs are limited. This study aimed to identify existing literature on intrahospital NAs’ administration approaches. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, CNKI, APA PsycInfo, Wanfang Med, SinoMed, Ovid Emcare, NICE, AHRQ, CADTH, JBI EBP and Cochrane DSR were searched for articles published between January 2011 and March 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Qualitative, quantitative or mixed-method studies and evidence syntheses that evaluate administration approaches, models and appraisal tools of intrahospital NAs were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers conducted search, data selection and data extraction according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and methodology for scoping review. The quality of included studies was assessed using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool or AMSTAR V.2. Data were synthesised using narrative methods and frequency effect size analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were eligible, with acceptable quality. We identified 1 administration model, 9 administration methods, 15 educational programmes and 7 appraisal tools from the included studies. The frequency effect size analysis yielded 15 topics of the main focus at four levels, suggesting that included articles were mainly (33%) focused on the competency of NAs, and the lectures were the most (80%) used strategy in quality improvement projects. Evidence from the studies was of low-to-moderate quality, indicating huge gaps between evidence-based research and management practice. CONCLUSIONS: Practical intrahospital administration approaches were revealed, and fifteen primarily focused topics were identified. We should explore this area more thoroughly using structured frameworks and standardised methodology. This scoping review will help managers find more effective ways to improve the quality of care. Researchers may focus more on evidence-based practice in NA administration using the 15 topics as a breakthrough.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97033142022-11-29 Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review Zeng, Ben-tuo Jin, Yinghui Cheng, Shu-dong Ding, Yan-ming Du, Ji-wei BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVES: The administration of nursing assistants (NAs) is closely associated with patient outcomes, but studies evaluating intrahospital administration of NAs are limited. This study aimed to identify existing literature on intrahospital NAs’ administration approaches. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, CNKI, APA PsycInfo, Wanfang Med, SinoMed, Ovid Emcare, NICE, AHRQ, CADTH, JBI EBP and Cochrane DSR were searched for articles published between January 2011 and March 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Qualitative, quantitative or mixed-method studies and evidence syntheses that evaluate administration approaches, models and appraisal tools of intrahospital NAs were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers conducted search, data selection and data extraction according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and methodology for scoping review. The quality of included studies was assessed using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool or AMSTAR V.2. Data were synthesised using narrative methods and frequency effect size analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were eligible, with acceptable quality. We identified 1 administration model, 9 administration methods, 15 educational programmes and 7 appraisal tools from the included studies. The frequency effect size analysis yielded 15 topics of the main focus at four levels, suggesting that included articles were mainly (33%) focused on the competency of NAs, and the lectures were the most (80%) used strategy in quality improvement projects. Evidence from the studies was of low-to-moderate quality, indicating huge gaps between evidence-based research and management practice. CONCLUSIONS: Practical intrahospital administration approaches were revealed, and fifteen primarily focused topics were identified. We should explore this area more thoroughly using structured frameworks and standardised methodology. This scoping review will help managers find more effective ways to improve the quality of care. Researchers may focus more on evidence-based practice in NA administration using the 15 topics as a breakthrough. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9703314/ /pubmed/36428023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063100 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Nursing
Zeng, Ben-tuo
Jin, Yinghui
Cheng, Shu-dong
Ding, Yan-ming
Du, Ji-wei
Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review
title Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review
title_full Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review
title_fullStr Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review
title_short Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review
title_sort administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063100
work_keys_str_mv AT zengbentuo administrationapproachesofnursingassistantsinhospitalsascopingreview
AT jinyinghui administrationapproachesofnursingassistantsinhospitalsascopingreview
AT chengshudong administrationapproachesofnursingassistantsinhospitalsascopingreview
AT dingyanming administrationapproachesofnursingassistantsinhospitalsascopingreview
AT dujiwei administrationapproachesofnursingassistantsinhospitalsascopingreview