Cargando…

Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Antenatal care (ANC) is crucial to protecting the health of pregnant women and their unborn children; however, the uptake of ANC among pregnant women in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is suboptimal. One popular strategy to increase the uptake of health services, including ANC vis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobs, Ward, Downey, Laura Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064673
_version_ 1784839816740864000
author Jacobs, Ward
Downey, Laura Emily
author_facet Jacobs, Ward
Downey, Laura Emily
author_sort Jacobs, Ward
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Antenatal care (ANC) is crucial to protecting the health of pregnant women and their unborn children; however, the uptake of ANC among pregnant women in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is suboptimal. One popular strategy to increase the uptake of health services, including ANC visits, are conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes. CCT programmes require beneficiaries to comply with certain conditionalities in order to receive a financial sum. A systematic review was carried out to determine whether CCT programmes have a positive impact on ANC uptake in LMIC populations. METHODS: Electronic databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Maternity and Infant Care and Global Health were searched from database inception to 21 January 2022. Reference checking and grey literature searches were also applied. Eligible study designs were randomised controlled trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series analysis. Risk of bias assessments were undertaken for each study by applying the Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. RESULTS: Out of 1534 screened articles, 18 publications were included for analysis. Eight studies reported statistically non-significant results on all reported outcomes. Seven studies demonstrated statistically significant positive effects ranging from 5.5% to 45% increase in ANC service uptake. A further three studies reported small but statistically significant impact of CCT on the use of ANC services in both positive (2.5% increase) and negative (3.7% decrease) directions. Subanalysis of results disaggregated by socioeconomic status (SES) indicated that ANC attendance may be more markedly improved by CCT programmes in low SES populations; however, results were inconclusive. CONCLUSION: Our evidence synthesis presented here demonstrated a highly heterogeneous evidence base pertaining to the impact of CCTs on ANC attendance. More high-powered studies are required to elucidate the true impact of CCT programmes on ANC uptake, with particular focus on the barriers and enablers of such programmes in achieving intended outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97033162022-11-29 Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review Jacobs, Ward Downey, Laura Emily BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: Antenatal care (ANC) is crucial to protecting the health of pregnant women and their unborn children; however, the uptake of ANC among pregnant women in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is suboptimal. One popular strategy to increase the uptake of health services, including ANC visits, are conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes. CCT programmes require beneficiaries to comply with certain conditionalities in order to receive a financial sum. A systematic review was carried out to determine whether CCT programmes have a positive impact on ANC uptake in LMIC populations. METHODS: Electronic databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Maternity and Infant Care and Global Health were searched from database inception to 21 January 2022. Reference checking and grey literature searches were also applied. Eligible study designs were randomised controlled trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series analysis. Risk of bias assessments were undertaken for each study by applying the Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. RESULTS: Out of 1534 screened articles, 18 publications were included for analysis. Eight studies reported statistically non-significant results on all reported outcomes. Seven studies demonstrated statistically significant positive effects ranging from 5.5% to 45% increase in ANC service uptake. A further three studies reported small but statistically significant impact of CCT on the use of ANC services in both positive (2.5% increase) and negative (3.7% decrease) directions. Subanalysis of results disaggregated by socioeconomic status (SES) indicated that ANC attendance may be more markedly improved by CCT programmes in low SES populations; however, results were inconclusive. CONCLUSION: Our evidence synthesis presented here demonstrated a highly heterogeneous evidence base pertaining to the impact of CCTs on ANC attendance. More high-powered studies are required to elucidate the true impact of CCT programmes on ANC uptake, with particular focus on the barriers and enablers of such programmes in achieving intended outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9703316/ /pubmed/36428017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064673 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economics
Jacobs, Ward
Downey, Laura Emily
Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_fullStr Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_short Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_sort impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064673
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsward impactofconditionalcashtransferprogrammesonantenatalcareserviceuptakeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT downeylauraemily impactofconditionalcashtransferprogrammesonantenatalcareserviceuptakeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview