Cargando…
Theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation
INTRODUCTION: Research–practice partnerships (RPPs) are long-term collaborations between research and practice that aim to conduct research that can be used to make practice-based improvements. They intentionally bring together diverse experience in decision making and seek to shift power dynamics s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068651 |
_version_ | 1784839817781051392 |
---|---|
author | Malley, Juliette Bauer, Annette Boaz, Annette Kendrick, Hannah Knapp, Martin |
author_facet | Malley, Juliette Bauer, Annette Boaz, Annette Kendrick, Hannah Knapp, Martin |
author_sort | Malley, Juliette |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Research–practice partnerships (RPPs) are long-term collaborations between research and practice that aim to conduct research that can be used to make practice-based improvements. They intentionally bring together diverse experience in decision making and seek to shift power dynamics so that all partners have a say. The Creating Care Partnerships project aims to explore whether the RPP approach developed within the US educational context can be successfully applied to the English care home context. The project involves a programme of codesign, implementation and evaluation within three case study sites. This protocol set outs the aims, research design and governance of the evaluation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation takes a theory-based approach to explore how, why and in what circumstances RPPs in the care home context contribute to enhancing research and research use in local care homes and informing wider improvement efforts. A mixed-methods design will be used for each case study, including semistructured interviews, observations of RPP events and meetings, an online survey, activity diary and review of local data and documents. Data collection will proceed in waves, with the theory of change (ToC) being continually refined and used to guide further data collection and analysis. Insights will be drawn using Contribution Analysis, Realist Evaluation and systems perspectives to assess the contribution made by the case study sites to achieving outcomes and the influence of contextual factors. Economic consequences will be identified through the ToC, using a narrative economic analysis to assess costs, consequences and value for money. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has undergone ethics review by HRA Research Ethics Committee. It does not pose major ethical issues. A final report will be published and articles will be submitted to international journals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9703321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97033212022-11-29 Theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation Malley, Juliette Bauer, Annette Boaz, Annette Kendrick, Hannah Knapp, Martin BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Research–practice partnerships (RPPs) are long-term collaborations between research and practice that aim to conduct research that can be used to make practice-based improvements. They intentionally bring together diverse experience in decision making and seek to shift power dynamics so that all partners have a say. The Creating Care Partnerships project aims to explore whether the RPP approach developed within the US educational context can be successfully applied to the English care home context. The project involves a programme of codesign, implementation and evaluation within three case study sites. This protocol set outs the aims, research design and governance of the evaluation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation takes a theory-based approach to explore how, why and in what circumstances RPPs in the care home context contribute to enhancing research and research use in local care homes and informing wider improvement efforts. A mixed-methods design will be used for each case study, including semistructured interviews, observations of RPP events and meetings, an online survey, activity diary and review of local data and documents. Data collection will proceed in waves, with the theory of change (ToC) being continually refined and used to guide further data collection and analysis. Insights will be drawn using Contribution Analysis, Realist Evaluation and systems perspectives to assess the contribution made by the case study sites to achieving outcomes and the influence of contextual factors. Economic consequences will be identified through the ToC, using a narrative economic analysis to assess costs, consequences and value for money. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has undergone ethics review by HRA Research Ethics Committee. It does not pose major ethical issues. A final report will be published and articles will be submitted to international journals. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9703321/ /pubmed/36428022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068651 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Malley, Juliette Bauer, Annette Boaz, Annette Kendrick, Hannah Knapp, Martin Theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation |
title | Theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation |
title_full | Theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation |
title_fullStr | Theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation |
title_short | Theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation |
title_sort | theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the uk: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malleyjuliette theorybasedevaluationofthreeresearchpracticepartnershipsdesignedtodelivernovelsustainablecollaborationsbetweenadultsocialcareresearchandpracticeintheukaresearchprotocolforalayeredcontributionsanalysisandrealistevaluation AT bauerannette theorybasedevaluationofthreeresearchpracticepartnershipsdesignedtodelivernovelsustainablecollaborationsbetweenadultsocialcareresearchandpracticeintheukaresearchprotocolforalayeredcontributionsanalysisandrealistevaluation AT boazannette theorybasedevaluationofthreeresearchpracticepartnershipsdesignedtodelivernovelsustainablecollaborationsbetweenadultsocialcareresearchandpracticeintheukaresearchprotocolforalayeredcontributionsanalysisandrealistevaluation AT kendrickhannah theorybasedevaluationofthreeresearchpracticepartnershipsdesignedtodelivernovelsustainablecollaborationsbetweenadultsocialcareresearchandpracticeintheukaresearchprotocolforalayeredcontributionsanalysisandrealistevaluation AT knappmartin theorybasedevaluationofthreeresearchpracticepartnershipsdesignedtodelivernovelsustainablecollaborationsbetweenadultsocialcareresearchandpracticeintheukaresearchprotocolforalayeredcontributionsanalysisandrealistevaluation |