Cargando…

Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) who remain with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis (DGAS) after adjustment for pressure recovery in the aortic root represents a subgroup of patients with increased cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Data from 1353 pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahlmann, Edda, Einarsen, Eigir, Cramariuc, Dana, Pedersen, Eva R, Rossebø, Anne B, Midtbø, Helga, Willems, Stephan, Gerdts, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002159
_version_ 1784839824101867520
author Bahlmann, Edda
Einarsen, Eigir
Cramariuc, Dana
Pedersen, Eva R
Rossebø, Anne B
Midtbø, Helga
Willems, Stephan
Gerdts, Eva
author_facet Bahlmann, Edda
Einarsen, Eigir
Cramariuc, Dana
Pedersen, Eva R
Rossebø, Anne B
Midtbø, Helga
Willems, Stephan
Gerdts, Eva
author_sort Bahlmann, Edda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) who remain with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis (DGAS) after adjustment for pressure recovery in the aortic root represents a subgroup of patients with increased cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Data from 1353 patients with asymptomatic mild–moderate AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study was used. DGAS was identified as combined pressure adjusted valve area (energy loss) <1.0 cm² and mean aortic gradient<40 mm Hg (DGAS(EL)). Outcome was assessed in Cox regression analysis and reported as HR and 95% CI. RESULTS: DGAS(EL) was found in 196 (14.5%) patients at baseline, and was associated with older age, female sex, smaller aortic annulus diameter, lower heart rate, more extensive valve calcification and low flow (all p<0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGAS(EL) was associated with higher rate of heart failure (HF) hospitalisation (HR 3.31 (95% CI 1.54 to 7.09)), cardiovascular death (HR 2.63 (95% CI 1.34 to 5.17)) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.87)) independent of confounders including low flow and aortic valve calcification (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with asymptomatic AS who remain with discordant grading after adjustment for pressure recovery have increased risk for HF and death. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00092677.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97033522022-11-29 Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area Bahlmann, Edda Einarsen, Eigir Cramariuc, Dana Pedersen, Eva R Rossebø, Anne B Midtbø, Helga Willems, Stephan Gerdts, Eva Open Heart Aortic and Vascular Disease OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) who remain with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis (DGAS) after adjustment for pressure recovery in the aortic root represents a subgroup of patients with increased cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Data from 1353 patients with asymptomatic mild–moderate AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study was used. DGAS was identified as combined pressure adjusted valve area (energy loss) <1.0 cm² and mean aortic gradient<40 mm Hg (DGAS(EL)). Outcome was assessed in Cox regression analysis and reported as HR and 95% CI. RESULTS: DGAS(EL) was found in 196 (14.5%) patients at baseline, and was associated with older age, female sex, smaller aortic annulus diameter, lower heart rate, more extensive valve calcification and low flow (all p<0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGAS(EL) was associated with higher rate of heart failure (HF) hospitalisation (HR 3.31 (95% CI 1.54 to 7.09)), cardiovascular death (HR 2.63 (95% CI 1.34 to 5.17)) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.87)) independent of confounders including low flow and aortic valve calcification (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with asymptomatic AS who remain with discordant grading after adjustment for pressure recovery have increased risk for HF and death. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00092677. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9703352/ /pubmed/36428084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002159 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Aortic and Vascular Disease
Bahlmann, Edda
Einarsen, Eigir
Cramariuc, Dana
Pedersen, Eva R
Rossebø, Anne B
Midtbø, Helga
Willems, Stephan
Gerdts, Eva
Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area
title Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area
title_full Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area
title_fullStr Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area
title_short Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area
title_sort prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area
topic Aortic and Vascular Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002159
work_keys_str_mv AT bahlmannedda prognosisinasymptomaticpatientswithdiscordantlygradedaorticvalvestenosisbasedonpressurerecoveryadjustedvalvearea
AT einarseneigir prognosisinasymptomaticpatientswithdiscordantlygradedaorticvalvestenosisbasedonpressurerecoveryadjustedvalvearea
AT cramariucdana prognosisinasymptomaticpatientswithdiscordantlygradedaorticvalvestenosisbasedonpressurerecoveryadjustedvalvearea
AT pedersenevar prognosisinasymptomaticpatientswithdiscordantlygradedaorticvalvestenosisbasedonpressurerecoveryadjustedvalvearea
AT rossebøanneb prognosisinasymptomaticpatientswithdiscordantlygradedaorticvalvestenosisbasedonpressurerecoveryadjustedvalvearea
AT midtbøhelga prognosisinasymptomaticpatientswithdiscordantlygradedaorticvalvestenosisbasedonpressurerecoveryadjustedvalvearea
AT willemsstephan prognosisinasymptomaticpatientswithdiscordantlygradedaorticvalvestenosisbasedonpressurerecoveryadjustedvalvearea
AT gerdtseva prognosisinasymptomaticpatientswithdiscordantlygradedaorticvalvestenosisbasedonpressurerecoveryadjustedvalvearea