Cargando…
Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) from non-tobacco sources in homes within high-income countries: a systematic review
The health impacts associated with exposure to elevated concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) are well recognised. There is a substantial number of studies characterising PM(2.5) concentrations outdoors, as well as in homes within low- and middle-income countries. In high-income countr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01288-8 |
_version_ | 1784839848161443840 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Shuying Semple, Sean |
author_facet | Wei, Shuying Semple, Sean |
author_sort | Wei, Shuying |
collection | PubMed |
description | The health impacts associated with exposure to elevated concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) are well recognised. There is a substantial number of studies characterising PM(2.5) concentrations outdoors, as well as in homes within low- and middle-income countries. In high-income countries (HICs), there is a sizeable literature on indoor PM(2.5) relating to smoking, but the evidence on exposure to PM(2.5) generated from non-tobacco sources in homes is sparse. This is especially relevant as people living in HICs spend the majority of their time at home, and in the northern hemisphere households often have low air exchange rates for energy efficiency. This review identified 49 studies that described indoor PM(2.5) concentrations generated from a variety of common household sources in real-life home settings in HICs. These included wood/solid fuel burning appliances, cooking, candles, incense, cleaning and humidifiers. The reported concentrations varied widely, both between sources and within groups of the same source. The burning of solid fuels was found to generate the highest indoor PM(2.5) concentrations. On occasion, other sources were also reported to be responsible for high PM(2.5) concentrations; however, this was only in a few select examples. This review also highlights the many inconsistencies in the ways data are collected and reported. The variable methods of measurement and reporting make comparison and interpretation of data difficult. There is a need for standardisation of methods and agreed contextual data to make household PM(2.5) data more useful in epidemiological studies and aid comparison of the impact of different interventions and policies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11869-022-01288-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9703437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97034372022-11-28 Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) from non-tobacco sources in homes within high-income countries: a systematic review Wei, Shuying Semple, Sean Air Qual Atmos Health Article The health impacts associated with exposure to elevated concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) are well recognised. There is a substantial number of studies characterising PM(2.5) concentrations outdoors, as well as in homes within low- and middle-income countries. In high-income countries (HICs), there is a sizeable literature on indoor PM(2.5) relating to smoking, but the evidence on exposure to PM(2.5) generated from non-tobacco sources in homes is sparse. This is especially relevant as people living in HICs spend the majority of their time at home, and in the northern hemisphere households often have low air exchange rates for energy efficiency. This review identified 49 studies that described indoor PM(2.5) concentrations generated from a variety of common household sources in real-life home settings in HICs. These included wood/solid fuel burning appliances, cooking, candles, incense, cleaning and humidifiers. The reported concentrations varied widely, both between sources and within groups of the same source. The burning of solid fuels was found to generate the highest indoor PM(2.5) concentrations. On occasion, other sources were also reported to be responsible for high PM(2.5) concentrations; however, this was only in a few select examples. This review also highlights the many inconsistencies in the ways data are collected and reported. The variable methods of measurement and reporting make comparison and interpretation of data difficult. There is a need for standardisation of methods and agreed contextual data to make household PM(2.5) data more useful in epidemiological studies and aid comparison of the impact of different interventions and policies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11869-022-01288-8. Springer Netherlands 2022-11-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9703437/ /pubmed/36467893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01288-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wei, Shuying Semple, Sean Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) from non-tobacco sources in homes within high-income countries: a systematic review |
title | Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) from non-tobacco sources in homes within high-income countries: a systematic review |
title_full | Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) from non-tobacco sources in homes within high-income countries: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) from non-tobacco sources in homes within high-income countries: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) from non-tobacco sources in homes within high-income countries: a systematic review |
title_short | Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) from non-tobacco sources in homes within high-income countries: a systematic review |
title_sort | exposure to fine particulate matter (pm(2.5)) from non-tobacco sources in homes within high-income countries: a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01288-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weishuying exposuretofineparticulatematterpm25fromnontobaccosourcesinhomeswithinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview AT semplesean exposuretofineparticulatematterpm25fromnontobaccosourcesinhomeswithinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview |