Cargando…

One hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy

BACKGROUND: Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses is regarded as safe and is widely used for histopathology diagnosis before treatment. Recommended observation time after tumour biopsy varies in international guidelines and the literature is sparse. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of a 1-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valtersson, John, Rasmussen, Benjamin S, Elgborn, Anders, Lund, Lars, Graumann, Ole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36452938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601221138555
_version_ 1784839865585631232
author Valtersson, John
Rasmussen, Benjamin S
Elgborn, Anders
Lund, Lars
Graumann, Ole
author_facet Valtersson, John
Rasmussen, Benjamin S
Elgborn, Anders
Lund, Lars
Graumann, Ole
author_sort Valtersson, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses is regarded as safe and is widely used for histopathology diagnosis before treatment. Recommended observation time after tumour biopsy varies in international guidelines and the literature is sparse. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of a 1-h post-biopsy observation time of percutaneous image-guided renal mass biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study. During January 2015 to September 2019, a total of 484 patients underwent renal mass biopsies. 4-h-observation-group: 178 patients and 1-h-observation-group 306 patients. All records were retrospectively reviewed, and data such as complications was obtained and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total complication rate of 4.5% (n = 22) without any major complications (Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe-grade (CIRSE) 5–6). Furthermore, a non-significant difference of 1.3% of the 1-h group and 3.4% in the 4-h group experiencing complications was found (p = .18). A total biopsy-accuracy of 84% was observed. CONCLUSION: This study shows that renal mass biopsy is safe with no major complications. This suggests that an outpatient approach with 1-h-observation time can be safely implemented for renal mass biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97035082022-11-29 One hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy Valtersson, John Rasmussen, Benjamin S Elgborn, Anders Lund, Lars Graumann, Ole Acta Radiol Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses is regarded as safe and is widely used for histopathology diagnosis before treatment. Recommended observation time after tumour biopsy varies in international guidelines and the literature is sparse. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of a 1-h post-biopsy observation time of percutaneous image-guided renal mass biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study. During January 2015 to September 2019, a total of 484 patients underwent renal mass biopsies. 4-h-observation-group: 178 patients and 1-h-observation-group 306 patients. All records were retrospectively reviewed, and data such as complications was obtained and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total complication rate of 4.5% (n = 22) without any major complications (Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe-grade (CIRSE) 5–6). Furthermore, a non-significant difference of 1.3% of the 1-h group and 3.4% in the 4-h group experiencing complications was found (p = .18). A total biopsy-accuracy of 84% was observed. CONCLUSION: This study shows that renal mass biopsy is safe with no major complications. This suggests that an outpatient approach with 1-h-observation time can be safely implemented for renal mass biopsy. SAGE Publications 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9703508/ /pubmed/36452938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601221138555 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Valtersson, John
Rasmussen, Benjamin S
Elgborn, Anders
Lund, Lars
Graumann, Ole
One hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy
title One hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy
title_full One hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy
title_fullStr One hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy
title_full_unstemmed One hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy
title_short One hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy
title_sort one hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36452938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601221138555
work_keys_str_mv AT valterssonjohn onehourobservationofpatientsafterimageguidedpercutaneousrenalmassbiopsy
AT rasmussenbenjamins onehourobservationofpatientsafterimageguidedpercutaneousrenalmassbiopsy
AT elgbornanders onehourobservationofpatientsafterimageguidedpercutaneousrenalmassbiopsy
AT lundlars onehourobservationofpatientsafterimageguidedpercutaneousrenalmassbiopsy
AT graumannole onehourobservationofpatientsafterimageguidedpercutaneousrenalmassbiopsy