Cargando…

The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel plus S-1(PTXS) has shown definite efficacy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) are unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) PT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chenghai, Wu, Binghong, Yang, Hong, Yao, Zhendan, Zhang, Nan, Tan, Fei, Liu, Maoxing, Xu, Kai, Chen, Lei, Xing, Jiadi, Cui, Ming, Su, Xiangqian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1
_version_ 1784839901384015872
author Zhang, Chenghai
Wu, Binghong
Yang, Hong
Yao, Zhendan
Zhang, Nan
Tan, Fei
Liu, Maoxing
Xu, Kai
Chen, Lei
Xing, Jiadi
Cui, Ming
Su, Xiangqian
author_facet Zhang, Chenghai
Wu, Binghong
Yang, Hong
Yao, Zhendan
Zhang, Nan
Tan, Fei
Liu, Maoxing
Xu, Kai
Chen, Lei
Xing, Jiadi
Cui, Ming
Su, Xiangqian
author_sort Zhang, Chenghai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel plus S-1(PTXS) has shown definite efficacy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) are unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) PTXS and oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) regime for patients with LAGC. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with LAGC (cT3/4NanyM0/x) who were treated with three cycles of neoadjuvant SOX regimen (n = 77) or PTXS regimen (n = 26) between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. NAC-related clinical response, pathological response, postoperative complication, and overall survival were analyzed between the groups. RESULTS: The baseline data did not differ significantly between both groups. After NAC, the disease control rate of the SOX group (94.8%) was comparable with that of the PTXS group (92.3%) (p = 0.641). Twenty-three cases (29.9%) in the SOX group and 10 cases (38.5%) in the PTX group got the descending stage with no statistical difference (p = 0.417). No significant differences were observed in the overall pathological response rate and the overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were also no differences between groups in terms of 5-year overall and disease-free survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The validity of NAC PTXS was not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer in terms of treatment response and overall survival. PTXS regimen could be expected to be ideal neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LAGC and should be adopted for the test arm of a large randomized controlled trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97036602022-11-29 The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study Zhang, Chenghai Wu, Binghong Yang, Hong Yao, Zhendan Zhang, Nan Tan, Fei Liu, Maoxing Xu, Kai Chen, Lei Xing, Jiadi Cui, Ming Su, Xiangqian BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel plus S-1(PTXS) has shown definite efficacy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) are unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) PTXS and oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) regime for patients with LAGC. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with LAGC (cT3/4NanyM0/x) who were treated with three cycles of neoadjuvant SOX regimen (n = 77) or PTXS regimen (n = 26) between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. NAC-related clinical response, pathological response, postoperative complication, and overall survival were analyzed between the groups. RESULTS: The baseline data did not differ significantly between both groups. After NAC, the disease control rate of the SOX group (94.8%) was comparable with that of the PTXS group (92.3%) (p = 0.641). Twenty-three cases (29.9%) in the SOX group and 10 cases (38.5%) in the PTX group got the descending stage with no statistical difference (p = 0.417). No significant differences were observed in the overall pathological response rate and the overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were also no differences between groups in terms of 5-year overall and disease-free survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The validity of NAC PTXS was not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer in terms of treatment response and overall survival. PTXS regimen could be expected to be ideal neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LAGC and should be adopted for the test arm of a large randomized controlled trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9703660/ /pubmed/36443694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Chenghai
Wu, Binghong
Yang, Hong
Yao, Zhendan
Zhang, Nan
Tan, Fei
Liu, Maoxing
Xu, Kai
Chen, Lei
Xing, Jiadi
Cui, Ming
Su, Xiangqian
The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study
title The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study
title_full The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study
title_fullStr The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study
title_short The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study
title_sort validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus s-1 is not inferior to that of sox regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchenghai thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT wubinghong thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT yanghong thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT yaozhendan thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT zhangnan thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT tanfei thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT liumaoxing thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT xukai thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT chenlei thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT xingjiadi thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT cuiming thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT suxiangqian thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT zhangchenghai validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT wubinghong validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT yanghong validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT yaozhendan validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT zhangnan validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT tanfei validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT liumaoxing validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT xukai validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT chenlei validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT xingjiadi validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT cuiming validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy
AT suxiangqian validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy