Cargando…
The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study
BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel plus S-1(PTXS) has shown definite efficacy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) are unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) PT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1 |
_version_ | 1784839901384015872 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Chenghai Wu, Binghong Yang, Hong Yao, Zhendan Zhang, Nan Tan, Fei Liu, Maoxing Xu, Kai Chen, Lei Xing, Jiadi Cui, Ming Su, Xiangqian |
author_facet | Zhang, Chenghai Wu, Binghong Yang, Hong Yao, Zhendan Zhang, Nan Tan, Fei Liu, Maoxing Xu, Kai Chen, Lei Xing, Jiadi Cui, Ming Su, Xiangqian |
author_sort | Zhang, Chenghai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel plus S-1(PTXS) has shown definite efficacy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) are unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) PTXS and oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) regime for patients with LAGC. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with LAGC (cT3/4NanyM0/x) who were treated with three cycles of neoadjuvant SOX regimen (n = 77) or PTXS regimen (n = 26) between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. NAC-related clinical response, pathological response, postoperative complication, and overall survival were analyzed between the groups. RESULTS: The baseline data did not differ significantly between both groups. After NAC, the disease control rate of the SOX group (94.8%) was comparable with that of the PTXS group (92.3%) (p = 0.641). Twenty-three cases (29.9%) in the SOX group and 10 cases (38.5%) in the PTX group got the descending stage with no statistical difference (p = 0.417). No significant differences were observed in the overall pathological response rate and the overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were also no differences between groups in terms of 5-year overall and disease-free survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The validity of NAC PTXS was not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer in terms of treatment response and overall survival. PTXS regimen could be expected to be ideal neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LAGC and should be adopted for the test arm of a large randomized controlled trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9703660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97036602022-11-29 The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study Zhang, Chenghai Wu, Binghong Yang, Hong Yao, Zhendan Zhang, Nan Tan, Fei Liu, Maoxing Xu, Kai Chen, Lei Xing, Jiadi Cui, Ming Su, Xiangqian BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel plus S-1(PTXS) has shown definite efficacy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) are unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) PTXS and oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) regime for patients with LAGC. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with LAGC (cT3/4NanyM0/x) who were treated with three cycles of neoadjuvant SOX regimen (n = 77) or PTXS regimen (n = 26) between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. NAC-related clinical response, pathological response, postoperative complication, and overall survival were analyzed between the groups. RESULTS: The baseline data did not differ significantly between both groups. After NAC, the disease control rate of the SOX group (94.8%) was comparable with that of the PTXS group (92.3%) (p = 0.641). Twenty-three cases (29.9%) in the SOX group and 10 cases (38.5%) in the PTX group got the descending stage with no statistical difference (p = 0.417). No significant differences were observed in the overall pathological response rate and the overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were also no differences between groups in terms of 5-year overall and disease-free survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The validity of NAC PTXS was not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer in terms of treatment response and overall survival. PTXS regimen could be expected to be ideal neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LAGC and should be adopted for the test arm of a large randomized controlled trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9703660/ /pubmed/36443694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhang, Chenghai Wu, Binghong Yang, Hong Yao, Zhendan Zhang, Nan Tan, Fei Liu, Maoxing Xu, Kai Chen, Lei Xing, Jiadi Cui, Ming Su, Xiangqian The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study |
title | The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study |
title_full | The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study |
title_fullStr | The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study |
title_short | The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study |
title_sort | validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus s-1 is not inferior to that of sox regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangchenghai thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT wubinghong thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT yanghong thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT yaozhendan thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT zhangnan thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT tanfei thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT liumaoxing thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT xukai thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT chenlei thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT xingjiadi thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT cuiming thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT suxiangqian thevalidityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT zhangchenghai validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT wubinghong validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT yanghong validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT yaozhendan validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT zhangnan validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT tanfei validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT liumaoxing validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT xukai validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT chenlei validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT xingjiadi validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT cuiming validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy AT suxiangqian validityofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpaclitaxelpluss1isnotinferiortothatofsoxregimenforlocallyadvancedgastriccanceranobservationalstudy |