Cargando…
The impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the body mass index (BMI) on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs of assisted reproduction, as there are still controversial and inconclusive studies on this subject. METHODS: This research was retrospective cohort study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02036-x |
_version_ | 1784839912313323520 |
---|---|
author | Dornelles, Victoria Campos Hentschke, Marta Ribeiro Badalotti, Mariangela Telöken, Isadora Badalotti Trindade, Vanessa Devens Cunegatto, Bibiana de Vasconcelos, Natália Fontoura da Costa, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro Petracco, Alvaro Padoin, Alexandre Vontobel |
author_facet | Dornelles, Victoria Campos Hentschke, Marta Ribeiro Badalotti, Mariangela Telöken, Isadora Badalotti Trindade, Vanessa Devens Cunegatto, Bibiana de Vasconcelos, Natália Fontoura da Costa, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro Petracco, Alvaro Padoin, Alexandre Vontobel |
author_sort | Dornelles, Victoria Campos |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the body mass index (BMI) on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs of assisted reproduction, as there are still controversial and inconclusive studies on this subject. METHODS: This research was retrospective cohort study, including women undergoing assisted reproduction in a Reproductive Medicine Center between 2013 and 2020. The participants were divided into groups according to BMI (kg/m(2)): Group 1 < 25; Group 2, 25–29.9 and Group 3, ≥ 30. A total of 1753 in vitro fertilization (IVF) fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles were included for assisted reproduction outcomes analysis and 1869 IVF-ET plus frozen embryo transfer (FET) for cumulative pregnancy analysis. RESULTS: As higher the BMI, higher was the proportion of canceled IVF cycles (G1 (6.9%) vs. G2 (7.8%) vs. G3 (10.4%), p = 0.002) and gonadotropin’s total dose (IU) and treatment costs (G1 (1685 ± 595, U$ 683,02) vs. G2 (1779 ± 610, U$ 721,13) vs. G3 (1805 ± 563, U$ 764,09), p = 0.001). A greater number of mature oocytes was observed in G1 and G2 (6 [6.4–7.0] vs. 6 [5.6–6.6] vs. 4 [4.6–6.7], p = 0.011), which was not found in oocyte maturity rate (p = 0.877). A significant linear tendency (p = 0.042) was found in cumulative pregnancy rates, pointing to worse clinical outcomes in overweight and obese patients. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of considering the higher treatment costs for these patients, beyond all the well-known risks regarding weight excess, fertility, and pregnancy, before starting IVF treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9703707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97037072022-11-29 The impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study Dornelles, Victoria Campos Hentschke, Marta Ribeiro Badalotti, Mariangela Telöken, Isadora Badalotti Trindade, Vanessa Devens Cunegatto, Bibiana de Vasconcelos, Natália Fontoura da Costa, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro Petracco, Alvaro Padoin, Alexandre Vontobel BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the body mass index (BMI) on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs of assisted reproduction, as there are still controversial and inconclusive studies on this subject. METHODS: This research was retrospective cohort study, including women undergoing assisted reproduction in a Reproductive Medicine Center between 2013 and 2020. The participants were divided into groups according to BMI (kg/m(2)): Group 1 < 25; Group 2, 25–29.9 and Group 3, ≥ 30. A total of 1753 in vitro fertilization (IVF) fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles were included for assisted reproduction outcomes analysis and 1869 IVF-ET plus frozen embryo transfer (FET) for cumulative pregnancy analysis. RESULTS: As higher the BMI, higher was the proportion of canceled IVF cycles (G1 (6.9%) vs. G2 (7.8%) vs. G3 (10.4%), p = 0.002) and gonadotropin’s total dose (IU) and treatment costs (G1 (1685 ± 595, U$ 683,02) vs. G2 (1779 ± 610, U$ 721,13) vs. G3 (1805 ± 563, U$ 764,09), p = 0.001). A greater number of mature oocytes was observed in G1 and G2 (6 [6.4–7.0] vs. 6 [5.6–6.6] vs. 4 [4.6–6.7], p = 0.011), which was not found in oocyte maturity rate (p = 0.877). A significant linear tendency (p = 0.042) was found in cumulative pregnancy rates, pointing to worse clinical outcomes in overweight and obese patients. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of considering the higher treatment costs for these patients, beyond all the well-known risks regarding weight excess, fertility, and pregnancy, before starting IVF treatments. BioMed Central 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9703707/ /pubmed/36443765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02036-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dornelles, Victoria Campos Hentschke, Marta Ribeiro Badalotti, Mariangela Telöken, Isadora Badalotti Trindade, Vanessa Devens Cunegatto, Bibiana de Vasconcelos, Natália Fontoura da Costa, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro Petracco, Alvaro Padoin, Alexandre Vontobel The impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study |
title | The impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | The impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | The impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | The impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02036-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dornellesvictoriacampos theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT hentschkemartaribeiro theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT badalottimariangela theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT telokenisadorabadalotti theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT trindadevanessadevens theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT cunegattobibiana theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT devasconcelosnataliafontoura theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT dacostabartiraerciliapinheiro theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT petraccoalvaro theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT padoinalexandrevontobel theimpactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT dornellesvictoriacampos impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT hentschkemartaribeiro impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT badalottimariangela impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT telokenisadorabadalotti impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT trindadevanessadevens impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT cunegattobibiana impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT devasconcelosnataliafontoura impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT dacostabartiraerciliapinheiro impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT petraccoalvaro impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT padoinalexandrevontobel impactofbodymassindexonlaboratoryclinicaloutcomesandtreatmentcostsinassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy |