Cargando…

Neutrophil CD64 index as a superior indicator for diagnosing, monitoring bacterial infection, and evaluating antibiotic therapy: a case control study

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index has been widely studied as an indication of bacteria-infected diseases, but the exact usage of nCD64 index in monitoring infections remains debated. So this study aims to investigate the functionality of nCD64 index in tracking infections’ progression and ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Yanting, Lin, Lihui, Zhao, Jinyan, Peng, Xia, Li, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07725-4
_version_ 1784839918110900224
author Gao, Yanting
Lin, Lihui
Zhao, Jinyan
Peng, Xia
Li, Li
author_facet Gao, Yanting
Lin, Lihui
Zhao, Jinyan
Peng, Xia
Li, Li
author_sort Gao, Yanting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index has been widely studied as an indication of bacteria-infected diseases, but the exact usage of nCD64 index in monitoring infections remains debated. So this study aims to investigate the functionality of nCD64 index in tracking infections’ progression and evaluating antibiotic therapy. METHODS: 160 participants (36 healthy controls, 34 culture-negative patients, 56 respiratory tract infected patients, and 34 bloodstream infected patients) were recruited and divided into groups. Data on nCD64 index, T lymphocyte subsets, and conventional indicators, including white blood cell count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein, were tested and compared. RESULTS: Bacteria-infected patients had significantly higher nCD64 indexes (p < 0.05), especially patients with both bloodstream and respiratory tract infections. The nCD64 index could identify infected patients from culture-negative patients or controls, which conventional indicators cannot achieve. We followed up with 24 infected patients and found that their nCD64 indexes were promptly down-regulated after effective antibiotic therapy (3.16 ± 3.01 vs. 1.20 ± 1.47, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The nCD64 index is a sensitive indicator for clinical diagnosis of bacterial infection, especially in monitoring infection and evaluating antibiotics’ efficacy. Therefore, nCD64 has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and provide rapid feedback on monitoring disease progression in infected patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07725-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97037382022-11-29 Neutrophil CD64 index as a superior indicator for diagnosing, monitoring bacterial infection, and evaluating antibiotic therapy: a case control study Gao, Yanting Lin, Lihui Zhao, Jinyan Peng, Xia Li, Li BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index has been widely studied as an indication of bacteria-infected diseases, but the exact usage of nCD64 index in monitoring infections remains debated. So this study aims to investigate the functionality of nCD64 index in tracking infections’ progression and evaluating antibiotic therapy. METHODS: 160 participants (36 healthy controls, 34 culture-negative patients, 56 respiratory tract infected patients, and 34 bloodstream infected patients) were recruited and divided into groups. Data on nCD64 index, T lymphocyte subsets, and conventional indicators, including white blood cell count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein, were tested and compared. RESULTS: Bacteria-infected patients had significantly higher nCD64 indexes (p < 0.05), especially patients with both bloodstream and respiratory tract infections. The nCD64 index could identify infected patients from culture-negative patients or controls, which conventional indicators cannot achieve. We followed up with 24 infected patients and found that their nCD64 indexes were promptly down-regulated after effective antibiotic therapy (3.16 ± 3.01 vs. 1.20 ± 1.47, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The nCD64 index is a sensitive indicator for clinical diagnosis of bacterial infection, especially in monitoring infection and evaluating antibiotics’ efficacy. Therefore, nCD64 has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and provide rapid feedback on monitoring disease progression in infected patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07725-4. BioMed Central 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9703738/ /pubmed/36443747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07725-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gao, Yanting
Lin, Lihui
Zhao, Jinyan
Peng, Xia
Li, Li
Neutrophil CD64 index as a superior indicator for diagnosing, monitoring bacterial infection, and evaluating antibiotic therapy: a case control study
title Neutrophil CD64 index as a superior indicator for diagnosing, monitoring bacterial infection, and evaluating antibiotic therapy: a case control study
title_full Neutrophil CD64 index as a superior indicator for diagnosing, monitoring bacterial infection, and evaluating antibiotic therapy: a case control study
title_fullStr Neutrophil CD64 index as a superior indicator for diagnosing, monitoring bacterial infection, and evaluating antibiotic therapy: a case control study
title_full_unstemmed Neutrophil CD64 index as a superior indicator for diagnosing, monitoring bacterial infection, and evaluating antibiotic therapy: a case control study
title_short Neutrophil CD64 index as a superior indicator for diagnosing, monitoring bacterial infection, and evaluating antibiotic therapy: a case control study
title_sort neutrophil cd64 index as a superior indicator for diagnosing, monitoring bacterial infection, and evaluating antibiotic therapy: a case control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07725-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoyanting neutrophilcd64indexasasuperiorindicatorfordiagnosingmonitoringbacterialinfectionandevaluatingantibiotictherapyacasecontrolstudy
AT linlihui neutrophilcd64indexasasuperiorindicatorfordiagnosingmonitoringbacterialinfectionandevaluatingantibiotictherapyacasecontrolstudy
AT zhaojinyan neutrophilcd64indexasasuperiorindicatorfordiagnosingmonitoringbacterialinfectionandevaluatingantibiotictherapyacasecontrolstudy
AT pengxia neutrophilcd64indexasasuperiorindicatorfordiagnosingmonitoringbacterialinfectionandevaluatingantibiotictherapyacasecontrolstudy
AT lili neutrophilcd64indexasasuperiorindicatorfordiagnosingmonitoringbacterialinfectionandevaluatingantibiotictherapyacasecontrolstudy