Cargando…

Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery

BACKGROUND: Gliomas are among the most typical brain tumors tackled by neurosurgeons. During navigation for surgery of glioma brain tumors, preoperatively acquired static images may not be accurate due to shifts. Surgeons use intraoperative imaging technologies (2-Dimensional and navigated 3-Dimensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Manoj, Noronha, Santosh, Rangaraj, Narayan, Moiyadi, Aliasgar, Shetty, Prakash, Singh, Vikas Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36437463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02046-7
_version_ 1784839928619728896
author Kumar, Manoj
Noronha, Santosh
Rangaraj, Narayan
Moiyadi, Aliasgar
Shetty, Prakash
Singh, Vikas Kumar
author_facet Kumar, Manoj
Noronha, Santosh
Rangaraj, Narayan
Moiyadi, Aliasgar
Shetty, Prakash
Singh, Vikas Kumar
author_sort Kumar, Manoj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gliomas are among the most typical brain tumors tackled by neurosurgeons. During navigation for surgery of glioma brain tumors, preoperatively acquired static images may not be accurate due to shifts. Surgeons use intraoperative imaging technologies (2-Dimensional and navigated 3-Dimensional ultrasound) to assess and guide resections. This paper aims to precisely capture the importance of preoperative parameters to decide which type of ultrasound to be used for a particular surgery. METHODS: This paper proposes two bagging algorithms considering base classifier logistic regression and random forest. These algorithms are trained on different subsets of the original data set. The goodness of fit of Logistic regression-based bagging algorithms is established using hypothesis testing. Furthermore, the performance measures for random-forest-based bagging algorithms used are AUC under ROC and AUC under the precision-recall curve. We also present a composite model without compromising the explainability of the models. RESULTS: These models were trained on the data of 350 patients who have undergone brain surgery from 2015 to 2020. The hypothesis test shows that a single parameter is sufficient instead of all three dimensions related to the tumor ([Formula: see text] ). We observed that the choice of intraoperative ultrasound depends on the surgeon making a choice, and years of experience of the surgeon could be a surrogate for this dependence. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that neurosurgeons may not need to focus on a large set of preoperative parameters in order to decide on ultrasound. Moreover, it personalizes the use of a particular ultrasound option in surgery. This approach could potentially lead to better resource management and help healthcare institutions improve their decisions to make the surgery more effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-02046-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97037862022-11-29 Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery Kumar, Manoj Noronha, Santosh Rangaraj, Narayan Moiyadi, Aliasgar Shetty, Prakash Singh, Vikas Kumar BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Gliomas are among the most typical brain tumors tackled by neurosurgeons. During navigation for surgery of glioma brain tumors, preoperatively acquired static images may not be accurate due to shifts. Surgeons use intraoperative imaging technologies (2-Dimensional and navigated 3-Dimensional ultrasound) to assess and guide resections. This paper aims to precisely capture the importance of preoperative parameters to decide which type of ultrasound to be used for a particular surgery. METHODS: This paper proposes two bagging algorithms considering base classifier logistic regression and random forest. These algorithms are trained on different subsets of the original data set. The goodness of fit of Logistic regression-based bagging algorithms is established using hypothesis testing. Furthermore, the performance measures for random-forest-based bagging algorithms used are AUC under ROC and AUC under the precision-recall curve. We also present a composite model without compromising the explainability of the models. RESULTS: These models were trained on the data of 350 patients who have undergone brain surgery from 2015 to 2020. The hypothesis test shows that a single parameter is sufficient instead of all three dimensions related to the tumor ([Formula: see text] ). We observed that the choice of intraoperative ultrasound depends on the surgeon making a choice, and years of experience of the surgeon could be a surrogate for this dependence. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that neurosurgeons may not need to focus on a large set of preoperative parameters in order to decide on ultrasound. Moreover, it personalizes the use of a particular ultrasound option in surgery. This approach could potentially lead to better resource management and help healthcare institutions improve their decisions to make the surgery more effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-02046-7. BioMed Central 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9703786/ /pubmed/36437463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02046-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kumar, Manoj
Noronha, Santosh
Rangaraj, Narayan
Moiyadi, Aliasgar
Shetty, Prakash
Singh, Vikas Kumar
Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery
title Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery
title_full Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery
title_fullStr Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery
title_full_unstemmed Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery
title_short Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery
title_sort choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36437463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02046-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarmanoj choiceofintraoperativeultrasoundadjunctsforbraintumorsurgery
AT noronhasantosh choiceofintraoperativeultrasoundadjunctsforbraintumorsurgery
AT rangarajnarayan choiceofintraoperativeultrasoundadjunctsforbraintumorsurgery
AT moiyadialiasgar choiceofintraoperativeultrasoundadjunctsforbraintumorsurgery
AT shettyprakash choiceofintraoperativeultrasoundadjunctsforbraintumorsurgery
AT singhvikaskumar choiceofintraoperativeultrasoundadjunctsforbraintumorsurgery