Cargando…

Comparison of In Vitro Approaches to Assess the Antibacterial Effects of Nanomaterials

The antibacterial properties of nanomaterials (NMs) can be exploited in a range of consumer products (e.g., wound dressings, food packaging, textiles, medicines). There is also interest in the exploitation of NMs as treatments for infectious diseases to help combat antibiotic resistance. Whilst the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masri, Abdulkader, Brown, David M., Smith, David G. E., Stone, Vicki, Johnston, Helinor J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13040255
_version_ 1784839960751243264
author Masri, Abdulkader
Brown, David M.
Smith, David G. E.
Stone, Vicki
Johnston, Helinor J.
author_facet Masri, Abdulkader
Brown, David M.
Smith, David G. E.
Stone, Vicki
Johnston, Helinor J.
author_sort Masri, Abdulkader
collection PubMed
description The antibacterial properties of nanomaterials (NMs) can be exploited in a range of consumer products (e.g., wound dressings, food packaging, textiles, medicines). There is also interest in the exploitation of NMs as treatments for infectious diseases to help combat antibiotic resistance. Whilst the antibacterial activity of NMs has been assessed in vitro and in vivo in numerous studies, the methodology used is very varied. Indeed, while numerous approaches are available to assess the antibacterial effect of NMs in vitro, they have not yet been systematically assessed for their suitability and sensitivity for testing NMs. It is therefore timely to consider what assays should be prioritised to screen the antibacterial properties of NMs. The majority of existing in vitro studies have focused on investigating the antibacterial effects exhibited by silver (Ag) NMs and have employed a limited range of assays. We therefore compared the antibacterial effects of copper oxide (CuO) NMs to Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis at various concentrations (12.5–200 µg/mL) using a battery of tests (well and disc diffusion, plate counts—time-kill method, optical density measurement—OD, Alamar Blue and live/dead viability assays, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction). CuO NMs were most toxic to B. subtilis and E. coli, while P. aeruginosa was the least sensitive strain. All assays employed detected the antibacterial activity of CuO NMs; however, they varied in their sensitivity, time, cost, technical difficulty and requirement for specialized equipment. In the future, we suggest that a combination of approaches is used to provide a robust assessment of the antibacterial activity of NMs. In particular, we recommend that the time-kill and OD assays are prioritised due to their greater sensitivity. We also suggest that standard operating protocols are developed so that the antibacterial activity of NMs can be assessed using a harmonised approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9703965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97039652022-11-29 Comparison of In Vitro Approaches to Assess the Antibacterial Effects of Nanomaterials Masri, Abdulkader Brown, David M. Smith, David G. E. Stone, Vicki Johnston, Helinor J. J Funct Biomater Article The antibacterial properties of nanomaterials (NMs) can be exploited in a range of consumer products (e.g., wound dressings, food packaging, textiles, medicines). There is also interest in the exploitation of NMs as treatments for infectious diseases to help combat antibiotic resistance. Whilst the antibacterial activity of NMs has been assessed in vitro and in vivo in numerous studies, the methodology used is very varied. Indeed, while numerous approaches are available to assess the antibacterial effect of NMs in vitro, they have not yet been systematically assessed for their suitability and sensitivity for testing NMs. It is therefore timely to consider what assays should be prioritised to screen the antibacterial properties of NMs. The majority of existing in vitro studies have focused on investigating the antibacterial effects exhibited by silver (Ag) NMs and have employed a limited range of assays. We therefore compared the antibacterial effects of copper oxide (CuO) NMs to Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis at various concentrations (12.5–200 µg/mL) using a battery of tests (well and disc diffusion, plate counts—time-kill method, optical density measurement—OD, Alamar Blue and live/dead viability assays, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction). CuO NMs were most toxic to B. subtilis and E. coli, while P. aeruginosa was the least sensitive strain. All assays employed detected the antibacterial activity of CuO NMs; however, they varied in their sensitivity, time, cost, technical difficulty and requirement for specialized equipment. In the future, we suggest that a combination of approaches is used to provide a robust assessment of the antibacterial activity of NMs. In particular, we recommend that the time-kill and OD assays are prioritised due to their greater sensitivity. We also suggest that standard operating protocols are developed so that the antibacterial activity of NMs can be assessed using a harmonised approach. MDPI 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9703965/ /pubmed/36412895 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13040255 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Masri, Abdulkader
Brown, David M.
Smith, David G. E.
Stone, Vicki
Johnston, Helinor J.
Comparison of In Vitro Approaches to Assess the Antibacterial Effects of Nanomaterials
title Comparison of In Vitro Approaches to Assess the Antibacterial Effects of Nanomaterials
title_full Comparison of In Vitro Approaches to Assess the Antibacterial Effects of Nanomaterials
title_fullStr Comparison of In Vitro Approaches to Assess the Antibacterial Effects of Nanomaterials
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of In Vitro Approaches to Assess the Antibacterial Effects of Nanomaterials
title_short Comparison of In Vitro Approaches to Assess the Antibacterial Effects of Nanomaterials
title_sort comparison of in vitro approaches to assess the antibacterial effects of nanomaterials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13040255
work_keys_str_mv AT masriabdulkader comparisonofinvitroapproachestoassesstheantibacterialeffectsofnanomaterials
AT browndavidm comparisonofinvitroapproachestoassesstheantibacterialeffectsofnanomaterials
AT smithdavidge comparisonofinvitroapproachestoassesstheantibacterialeffectsofnanomaterials
AT stonevicki comparisonofinvitroapproachestoassesstheantibacterialeffectsofnanomaterials
AT johnstonhelinorj comparisonofinvitroapproachestoassesstheantibacterialeffectsofnanomaterials