Cargando…

Qualification of a Biolayer Interferometry Assay to Support AZD7442 Resistance Monitoring

AZD7442, a combination of two long-acting monoclonal antibodies (tixagevimab [AZD8895] and cilgavimab [AZD1061]), has been authorized for the prevention and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The rapid emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brady, Tyler, Zhang, Tianhui, Tuffy, Kevin M., Haskins, Nantaporn, Du, Qun, Lin, Jia, Kaplan, Gilad, Novick, Steven, Roe, Tiffany L., Ren, Kuishu, Rosenthal, Kim, McTamney, Patrick M., Abram, Michael E., Streicher, Katie, Kelly, Elizabeth J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01034-22
_version_ 1784839977349152768
author Brady, Tyler
Zhang, Tianhui
Tuffy, Kevin M.
Haskins, Nantaporn
Du, Qun
Lin, Jia
Kaplan, Gilad
Novick, Steven
Roe, Tiffany L.
Ren, Kuishu
Rosenthal, Kim
McTamney, Patrick M.
Abram, Michael E.
Streicher, Katie
Kelly, Elizabeth J.
author_facet Brady, Tyler
Zhang, Tianhui
Tuffy, Kevin M.
Haskins, Nantaporn
Du, Qun
Lin, Jia
Kaplan, Gilad
Novick, Steven
Roe, Tiffany L.
Ren, Kuishu
Rosenthal, Kim
McTamney, Patrick M.
Abram, Michael E.
Streicher, Katie
Kelly, Elizabeth J.
author_sort Brady, Tyler
collection PubMed
description AZD7442, a combination of two long-acting monoclonal antibodies (tixagevimab [AZD8895] and cilgavimab [AZD1061]), has been authorized for the prevention and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The rapid emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants requires methods capable of quickly characterizing resistance to AZD7442. To support AZD7442 resistance monitoring, a biolayer interferometry (BLI) assay was developed to screen the binding of tixagevimab and cilgavimab to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins to reduce the number of viral variants for neutralization susceptibility verification. Six spike variants were chosen to assess the assay’s performance: four with decreased affinity for tixagevimab (F486S:D614G and F486W:D614G proteins) or cilgavimab (S494L:D614G and K444R:D614G proteins) and two reference proteins (wild-type HexaPro and D614G protein). Equilibrium dissociation constant (K(D)) values from each spike protein were used to determine shifts in binding affinity. The assay’s precision, range, linearity, and limits of quantitation were established. Qualification acceptance criteria determined whether the assay was fit for purpose. By bypassing protein purification, the BLI assay provided increased screening throughput. Although limited correlation between pseudotype neutralization and BLI data (50% inhibitory concentration versus K(D)) was observed for full immunoglobulins (IgGs), the correlations for antibody fragments (Fabs) were stronger and reflected a better comparison of antibody binding kinetics with neutralization potency. Therefore, despite strong assay performance characteristics, the use of full IgGs limited the screening utility of the assay; however, the Fab approach warrants further exploration as a rapid, high-throughput variant-screening method for future resistance-monitoring programs. IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2 variants harbor multiple substitutions in their spike trimers, potentially leading to breakthrough infections and clinical resistance to immune therapies. For this reason, a BLI assay was developed and qualified to evaluate the reliability of screening SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer variants against anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) tixagevimab and cilgavimab, the components of AZD7442, prior to in vitro pseudovirus neutralization susceptibility verification testing. The assay bypasses protein purification with rapid assessment of the binding affinity of each MAb for each recombinant protein, potentially providing an efficient preliminary selection step, thus allowing a reduced testing burden in the more technically complex viral neutralization assays. Despite precise and specific measures, an avidity effect associated with MAb binding to the trimer confounded correlation with neutralization potency, negating the assay’s utility as a surrogate for neutralizing antibody potency. Improved correlation with Fabs suggests that assay optimization could overcome any avidity limitation, warranting further exploration to support future resistance-monitoring programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9704045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97040452022-11-29 Qualification of a Biolayer Interferometry Assay to Support AZD7442 Resistance Monitoring Brady, Tyler Zhang, Tianhui Tuffy, Kevin M. Haskins, Nantaporn Du, Qun Lin, Jia Kaplan, Gilad Novick, Steven Roe, Tiffany L. Ren, Kuishu Rosenthal, Kim McTamney, Patrick M. Abram, Michael E. Streicher, Katie Kelly, Elizabeth J. Microbiol Spectr Research Article AZD7442, a combination of two long-acting monoclonal antibodies (tixagevimab [AZD8895] and cilgavimab [AZD1061]), has been authorized for the prevention and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The rapid emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants requires methods capable of quickly characterizing resistance to AZD7442. To support AZD7442 resistance monitoring, a biolayer interferometry (BLI) assay was developed to screen the binding of tixagevimab and cilgavimab to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins to reduce the number of viral variants for neutralization susceptibility verification. Six spike variants were chosen to assess the assay’s performance: four with decreased affinity for tixagevimab (F486S:D614G and F486W:D614G proteins) or cilgavimab (S494L:D614G and K444R:D614G proteins) and two reference proteins (wild-type HexaPro and D614G protein). Equilibrium dissociation constant (K(D)) values from each spike protein were used to determine shifts in binding affinity. The assay’s precision, range, linearity, and limits of quantitation were established. Qualification acceptance criteria determined whether the assay was fit for purpose. By bypassing protein purification, the BLI assay provided increased screening throughput. Although limited correlation between pseudotype neutralization and BLI data (50% inhibitory concentration versus K(D)) was observed for full immunoglobulins (IgGs), the correlations for antibody fragments (Fabs) were stronger and reflected a better comparison of antibody binding kinetics with neutralization potency. Therefore, despite strong assay performance characteristics, the use of full IgGs limited the screening utility of the assay; however, the Fab approach warrants further exploration as a rapid, high-throughput variant-screening method for future resistance-monitoring programs. IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2 variants harbor multiple substitutions in their spike trimers, potentially leading to breakthrough infections and clinical resistance to immune therapies. For this reason, a BLI assay was developed and qualified to evaluate the reliability of screening SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer variants against anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) tixagevimab and cilgavimab, the components of AZD7442, prior to in vitro pseudovirus neutralization susceptibility verification testing. The assay bypasses protein purification with rapid assessment of the binding affinity of each MAb for each recombinant protein, potentially providing an efficient preliminary selection step, thus allowing a reduced testing burden in the more technically complex viral neutralization assays. Despite precise and specific measures, an avidity effect associated with MAb binding to the trimer confounded correlation with neutralization potency, negating the assay’s utility as a surrogate for neutralizing antibody potency. Improved correlation with Fabs suggests that assay optimization could overcome any avidity limitation, warranting further exploration to support future resistance-monitoring programs. American Society for Microbiology 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9704045/ /pubmed/35993765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01034-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Brady et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Brady, Tyler
Zhang, Tianhui
Tuffy, Kevin M.
Haskins, Nantaporn
Du, Qun
Lin, Jia
Kaplan, Gilad
Novick, Steven
Roe, Tiffany L.
Ren, Kuishu
Rosenthal, Kim
McTamney, Patrick M.
Abram, Michael E.
Streicher, Katie
Kelly, Elizabeth J.
Qualification of a Biolayer Interferometry Assay to Support AZD7442 Resistance Monitoring
title Qualification of a Biolayer Interferometry Assay to Support AZD7442 Resistance Monitoring
title_full Qualification of a Biolayer Interferometry Assay to Support AZD7442 Resistance Monitoring
title_fullStr Qualification of a Biolayer Interferometry Assay to Support AZD7442 Resistance Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Qualification of a Biolayer Interferometry Assay to Support AZD7442 Resistance Monitoring
title_short Qualification of a Biolayer Interferometry Assay to Support AZD7442 Resistance Monitoring
title_sort qualification of a biolayer interferometry assay to support azd7442 resistance monitoring
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01034-22
work_keys_str_mv AT bradytyler qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT zhangtianhui qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT tuffykevinm qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT haskinsnantaporn qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT duqun qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT linjia qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT kaplangilad qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT novicksteven qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT roetiffanyl qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT renkuishu qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT rosenthalkim qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT mctamneypatrickm qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT abrammichaele qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT streicherkatie qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring
AT kellyelizabethj qualificationofabiolayerinterferometryassaytosupportazd7442resistancemonitoring