Cargando…

Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values

INTRODUCTION: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terwee, Caroline B., Roorda, Leo D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36426680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2149849
_version_ 1784839982738833408
author Terwee, Caroline B.
Roorda, Leo D.
author_facet Terwee, Caroline B.
Roorda, Leo D.
author_sort Terwee, Caroline B.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB), Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APSRA), and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SSRA), as compared to US reference values. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A panel completed full PROMIS-PF (n=1310), PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB (n=1052), and PROMIS-APSRA and PROMIS-SSRA (n=1002) item banks and reported their level of health per domain (no, mild, moderate, severe limitations). T-scores were calculated by sample and subgroups (age, gender, self-reported level of domain). Distribution-based and anchor-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were determined. RESULTS: Mean T-scores were close to the US mean of 50 for PROMIS-PF (49.8) and PROMIS-APSRA (50.6), lower for PROMIS-SSRA (47.5) and higher for PROMIS-PI (54.9) and PROMIS-PB (52.0). Distribution-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were comparable to US recommended cut-off values (except for PROMIS-PI) but participants reported limitations ‘earlier’ than suggested thresholds. CONCLUSION: Dutch reference values were close to US reference values for some PROMIS domains but not all. We recommend country-specific reference values to facilitate worldwide PROMIS use. KEY MESSAGES: PROMIS offers universally applicable IRT-based efficient and patient-friendly measures to assess commonly relevant patient-reported outcomes across medical conditions. To support the use of PROMIS in daily clinical practice and research across the world, country-specific general population reference values should be obtained. More research is necessary to obtain reliable and valid cut-off values for what constitutes mild, moderate and severe scores from the patients’ perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9704075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97040752022-11-29 Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values Terwee, Caroline B. Roorda, Leo D. Ann Med Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation INTRODUCTION: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB), Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APSRA), and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SSRA), as compared to US reference values. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A panel completed full PROMIS-PF (n=1310), PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB (n=1052), and PROMIS-APSRA and PROMIS-SSRA (n=1002) item banks and reported their level of health per domain (no, mild, moderate, severe limitations). T-scores were calculated by sample and subgroups (age, gender, self-reported level of domain). Distribution-based and anchor-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were determined. RESULTS: Mean T-scores were close to the US mean of 50 for PROMIS-PF (49.8) and PROMIS-APSRA (50.6), lower for PROMIS-SSRA (47.5) and higher for PROMIS-PI (54.9) and PROMIS-PB (52.0). Distribution-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were comparable to US recommended cut-off values (except for PROMIS-PI) but participants reported limitations ‘earlier’ than suggested thresholds. CONCLUSION: Dutch reference values were close to US reference values for some PROMIS domains but not all. We recommend country-specific reference values to facilitate worldwide PROMIS use. KEY MESSAGES: PROMIS offers universally applicable IRT-based efficient and patient-friendly measures to assess commonly relevant patient-reported outcomes across medical conditions. To support the use of PROMIS in daily clinical practice and research across the world, country-specific general population reference values should be obtained. More research is necessary to obtain reliable and valid cut-off values for what constitutes mild, moderate and severe scores from the patients’ perspective. Taylor & Francis 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9704075/ /pubmed/36426680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2149849 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Terwee, Caroline B.
Roorda, Leo D.
Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values
title Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values
title_full Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values
title_fullStr Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values
title_full_unstemmed Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values
title_short Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values
title_sort country-specific reference values for promis(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to us reference values
topic Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36426680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2149849
work_keys_str_mv AT terweecarolineb countryspecificreferencevaluesforpromispainphysicalfunctionandparticipationmeasurescomparedtousreferencevalues
AT roordaleod countryspecificreferencevaluesforpromispainphysicalfunctionandparticipationmeasurescomparedtousreferencevalues