Cargando…
Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values
INTRODUCTION: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain B...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36426680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2149849 |
_version_ | 1784839982738833408 |
---|---|
author | Terwee, Caroline B. Roorda, Leo D. |
author_facet | Terwee, Caroline B. Roorda, Leo D. |
author_sort | Terwee, Caroline B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB), Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APSRA), and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SSRA), as compared to US reference values. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A panel completed full PROMIS-PF (n=1310), PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB (n=1052), and PROMIS-APSRA and PROMIS-SSRA (n=1002) item banks and reported their level of health per domain (no, mild, moderate, severe limitations). T-scores were calculated by sample and subgroups (age, gender, self-reported level of domain). Distribution-based and anchor-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were determined. RESULTS: Mean T-scores were close to the US mean of 50 for PROMIS-PF (49.8) and PROMIS-APSRA (50.6), lower for PROMIS-SSRA (47.5) and higher for PROMIS-PI (54.9) and PROMIS-PB (52.0). Distribution-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were comparable to US recommended cut-off values (except for PROMIS-PI) but participants reported limitations ‘earlier’ than suggested thresholds. CONCLUSION: Dutch reference values were close to US reference values for some PROMIS domains but not all. We recommend country-specific reference values to facilitate worldwide PROMIS use. KEY MESSAGES: PROMIS offers universally applicable IRT-based efficient and patient-friendly measures to assess commonly relevant patient-reported outcomes across medical conditions. To support the use of PROMIS in daily clinical practice and research across the world, country-specific general population reference values should be obtained. More research is necessary to obtain reliable and valid cut-off values for what constitutes mild, moderate and severe scores from the patients’ perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9704075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97040752022-11-29 Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values Terwee, Caroline B. Roorda, Leo D. Ann Med Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation INTRODUCTION: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB), Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APSRA), and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SSRA), as compared to US reference values. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A panel completed full PROMIS-PF (n=1310), PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB (n=1052), and PROMIS-APSRA and PROMIS-SSRA (n=1002) item banks and reported their level of health per domain (no, mild, moderate, severe limitations). T-scores were calculated by sample and subgroups (age, gender, self-reported level of domain). Distribution-based and anchor-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were determined. RESULTS: Mean T-scores were close to the US mean of 50 for PROMIS-PF (49.8) and PROMIS-APSRA (50.6), lower for PROMIS-SSRA (47.5) and higher for PROMIS-PI (54.9) and PROMIS-PB (52.0). Distribution-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were comparable to US recommended cut-off values (except for PROMIS-PI) but participants reported limitations ‘earlier’ than suggested thresholds. CONCLUSION: Dutch reference values were close to US reference values for some PROMIS domains but not all. We recommend country-specific reference values to facilitate worldwide PROMIS use. KEY MESSAGES: PROMIS offers universally applicable IRT-based efficient and patient-friendly measures to assess commonly relevant patient-reported outcomes across medical conditions. To support the use of PROMIS in daily clinical practice and research across the world, country-specific general population reference values should be obtained. More research is necessary to obtain reliable and valid cut-off values for what constitutes mild, moderate and severe scores from the patients’ perspective. Taylor & Francis 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9704075/ /pubmed/36426680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2149849 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Terwee, Caroline B. Roorda, Leo D. Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values |
title | Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values |
title_full | Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values |
title_fullStr | Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values |
title_full_unstemmed | Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values |
title_short | Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values |
title_sort | country-specific reference values for promis(®) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to us reference values |
topic | Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36426680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2149849 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terweecarolineb countryspecificreferencevaluesforpromispainphysicalfunctionandparticipationmeasurescomparedtousreferencevalues AT roordaleod countryspecificreferencevaluesforpromispainphysicalfunctionandparticipationmeasurescomparedtousreferencevalues |