Cargando…

A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results

This paper reports the results of a public engagement study on heritable human genome editing (HHGE) carried out in South Africa, which was conducted in accordance with a study protocol that was published in this journal in 2021. This study is novel as it is the first public engagement study on HHGE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thaldar, Donrich, Shozi, Bonginkosi, Steytler, Michaela, Hendry, Gill, Botes, Marietjie, Mnyandu, Ntokozo, Naidoo, Meshandren, Pillay, Siddharthiya, Slabbert, Magda, Townsend, Beverley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275372
_version_ 1784840090905739264
author Thaldar, Donrich
Shozi, Bonginkosi
Steytler, Michaela
Hendry, Gill
Botes, Marietjie
Mnyandu, Ntokozo
Naidoo, Meshandren
Pillay, Siddharthiya
Slabbert, Magda
Townsend, Beverley
author_facet Thaldar, Donrich
Shozi, Bonginkosi
Steytler, Michaela
Hendry, Gill
Botes, Marietjie
Mnyandu, Ntokozo
Naidoo, Meshandren
Pillay, Siddharthiya
Slabbert, Magda
Townsend, Beverley
author_sort Thaldar, Donrich
collection PubMed
description This paper reports the results of a public engagement study on heritable human genome editing (HHGE) carried out in South Africa, which was conducted in accordance with a study protocol that was published in this journal in 2021. This study is novel as it is the first public engagement study on HHGE in Africa. It used a deliberative public engagement (DPE) methodology, entailing inter alia that measures were put in place to ensure that potential participants became informed about HHGE, and that deliberations between the participants were facilitated with the aim of seeking consensus. A diverse group of 30 persons was selected to participate in the DPE study, which took place via Zoom over three consecutive weekday evenings. The main results are: Provided that HHGE is safe and effective, an overwhelming majority of participants supported allowing the use of HHGE to prevent genetic health conditions and for immunity against TB and HIV/Aids, while significant majorities opposed allowing HHGE for enhancement. The dominant paradigm during the deliberations was balancing health benefits (and associated improvements in quality of life) with unforeseen health risks (such as loss of natural immunity). The seriousness of a health condition emerged as the determining factor for the policy choice of whether to allow an application of HHGE. More generally, equal access to HHGE qua healthcare service featured as an important value, and it was uncontested that the South African government should allocate resources to promote scientific research into HHGE. These results are aligned with the policy principles for regulating HHGE in South Africa suggested by Thaldar et al. They call for urgent revision of South African ethics guidelines that currently prohibit research on HHGE, and for dedicated HHGE legal regulations that provide a clear and comprehensive legal pathway for researchers who intend to conduct HHGE research and clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9704621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97046212022-11-29 A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results Thaldar, Donrich Shozi, Bonginkosi Steytler, Michaela Hendry, Gill Botes, Marietjie Mnyandu, Ntokozo Naidoo, Meshandren Pillay, Siddharthiya Slabbert, Magda Townsend, Beverley PLoS One Research Article This paper reports the results of a public engagement study on heritable human genome editing (HHGE) carried out in South Africa, which was conducted in accordance with a study protocol that was published in this journal in 2021. This study is novel as it is the first public engagement study on HHGE in Africa. It used a deliberative public engagement (DPE) methodology, entailing inter alia that measures were put in place to ensure that potential participants became informed about HHGE, and that deliberations between the participants were facilitated with the aim of seeking consensus. A diverse group of 30 persons was selected to participate in the DPE study, which took place via Zoom over three consecutive weekday evenings. The main results are: Provided that HHGE is safe and effective, an overwhelming majority of participants supported allowing the use of HHGE to prevent genetic health conditions and for immunity against TB and HIV/Aids, while significant majorities opposed allowing HHGE for enhancement. The dominant paradigm during the deliberations was balancing health benefits (and associated improvements in quality of life) with unforeseen health risks (such as loss of natural immunity). The seriousness of a health condition emerged as the determining factor for the policy choice of whether to allow an application of HHGE. More generally, equal access to HHGE qua healthcare service featured as an important value, and it was uncontested that the South African government should allocate resources to promote scientific research into HHGE. These results are aligned with the policy principles for regulating HHGE in South Africa suggested by Thaldar et al. They call for urgent revision of South African ethics guidelines that currently prohibit research on HHGE, and for dedicated HHGE legal regulations that provide a clear and comprehensive legal pathway for researchers who intend to conduct HHGE research and clinical trials. Public Library of Science 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9704621/ /pubmed/36441783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275372 Text en © 2022 Thaldar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thaldar, Donrich
Shozi, Bonginkosi
Steytler, Michaela
Hendry, Gill
Botes, Marietjie
Mnyandu, Ntokozo
Naidoo, Meshandren
Pillay, Siddharthiya
Slabbert, Magda
Townsend, Beverley
A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results
title A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results
title_full A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results
title_fullStr A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results
title_full_unstemmed A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results
title_short A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results
title_sort deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among south africans: study results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275372
work_keys_str_mv AT thaldardonrich adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT shozibonginkosi adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT steytlermichaela adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT hendrygill adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT botesmarietjie adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT mnyanduntokozo adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT naidoomeshandren adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT pillaysiddharthiya adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT slabbertmagda adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT townsendbeverley adeliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT thaldardonrich deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT shozibonginkosi deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT steytlermichaela deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT hendrygill deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT botesmarietjie deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT mnyanduntokozo deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT naidoomeshandren deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT pillaysiddharthiya deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT slabbertmagda deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults
AT townsendbeverley deliberativepublicengagementstudyonheritablehumangenomeeditingamongsouthafricansstudyresults