Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy

BACKGROUND: Most SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) validation studies have been performed on specimens from COVID-19 patients and negative controls or from mostly symptomatic individuals. Herein we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AFIAS COVID-19 Ag, hereinafter denominated as AFIA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verde, Paola, Marcantonio, Cinzia, Costantino, Angela, Martina, Antonio, Simeoni, Matteo, Taffon, Stefania, Tritarelli, Elena, Campanella, Carmelo, Cresta, Raffaele, Bruni, Roberto, Ciccaglione, Anna Rita, Pisani, Giulio, Nisini, Roberto, Spada, Enea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277904
_version_ 1784840098758524928
author Verde, Paola
Marcantonio, Cinzia
Costantino, Angela
Martina, Antonio
Simeoni, Matteo
Taffon, Stefania
Tritarelli, Elena
Campanella, Carmelo
Cresta, Raffaele
Bruni, Roberto
Ciccaglione, Anna Rita
Pisani, Giulio
Nisini, Roberto
Spada, Enea
author_facet Verde, Paola
Marcantonio, Cinzia
Costantino, Angela
Martina, Antonio
Simeoni, Matteo
Taffon, Stefania
Tritarelli, Elena
Campanella, Carmelo
Cresta, Raffaele
Bruni, Roberto
Ciccaglione, Anna Rita
Pisani, Giulio
Nisini, Roberto
Spada, Enea
author_sort Verde, Paola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) validation studies have been performed on specimens from COVID-19 patients and negative controls or from mostly symptomatic individuals. Herein we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AFIAS COVID-19 Ag, hereinafter denominated as AFIAS, during a COVID-19 screening program surveillance testing conducted among personnel of an Italian military airport. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) were collected from study participants and were analysed by both AFIAS and RT-PCR assay. A questionnaire collecting demographic and exposure data were administered to all participants. AFIAS accuracy parameters including Cohen’s kappa (K) were determined. RESULTS: Overall, from November 2020 to April 2021, 1294 (NPSs) were collected from 1183 participants (88.6% males, 11.4% females; mean age were 41.3, median age 42). Forty-nine NPSs (3.78%) were positive by RT-PCR, while 54 NPSs were positive by AFIAS. Overall baseline sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 0.633, 0.981, 0.574, 0.985, respectively and K was 0.585 (moderate). AFIAS sensitivity tended to be higher for NPSs with higher viral load. A higher sensitivity (0.944) compared to the overall baseline sensitivity (0.633) was also found for NPSs from participants with COVID-19 compatible symptoms, for which K was 0.891 (almost perfect). Instead, AFIAS sensitivity was quite poor for NPSs from asymptomatic participants. Most false negative NPSs in this group had moderate viral load. CONCLUSION: Overall, AFIAS showed high specificity but only moderate sensitivity, mainly because of the high proportion of asymptomatic participants. However, AFIAS showed good sensitivity for NPSs with high viral load and nearly optimal accuracy parameters for NPSs from participants with COVID-19 compatible symptoms. Thus, taking into consideration its performance features, this test can be useful for COVID-19 case identification and management as well as for infection control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9704652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97046522022-11-29 Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy Verde, Paola Marcantonio, Cinzia Costantino, Angela Martina, Antonio Simeoni, Matteo Taffon, Stefania Tritarelli, Elena Campanella, Carmelo Cresta, Raffaele Bruni, Roberto Ciccaglione, Anna Rita Pisani, Giulio Nisini, Roberto Spada, Enea PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Most SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) validation studies have been performed on specimens from COVID-19 patients and negative controls or from mostly symptomatic individuals. Herein we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AFIAS COVID-19 Ag, hereinafter denominated as AFIAS, during a COVID-19 screening program surveillance testing conducted among personnel of an Italian military airport. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) were collected from study participants and were analysed by both AFIAS and RT-PCR assay. A questionnaire collecting demographic and exposure data were administered to all participants. AFIAS accuracy parameters including Cohen’s kappa (K) were determined. RESULTS: Overall, from November 2020 to April 2021, 1294 (NPSs) were collected from 1183 participants (88.6% males, 11.4% females; mean age were 41.3, median age 42). Forty-nine NPSs (3.78%) were positive by RT-PCR, while 54 NPSs were positive by AFIAS. Overall baseline sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 0.633, 0.981, 0.574, 0.985, respectively and K was 0.585 (moderate). AFIAS sensitivity tended to be higher for NPSs with higher viral load. A higher sensitivity (0.944) compared to the overall baseline sensitivity (0.633) was also found for NPSs from participants with COVID-19 compatible symptoms, for which K was 0.891 (almost perfect). Instead, AFIAS sensitivity was quite poor for NPSs from asymptomatic participants. Most false negative NPSs in this group had moderate viral load. CONCLUSION: Overall, AFIAS showed high specificity but only moderate sensitivity, mainly because of the high proportion of asymptomatic participants. However, AFIAS showed good sensitivity for NPSs with high viral load and nearly optimal accuracy parameters for NPSs from participants with COVID-19 compatible symptoms. Thus, taking into consideration its performance features, this test can be useful for COVID-19 case identification and management as well as for infection control. Public Library of Science 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9704652/ /pubmed/36441672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277904 Text en © 2022 Verde et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Verde, Paola
Marcantonio, Cinzia
Costantino, Angela
Martina, Antonio
Simeoni, Matteo
Taffon, Stefania
Tritarelli, Elena
Campanella, Carmelo
Cresta, Raffaele
Bruni, Roberto
Ciccaglione, Anna Rita
Pisani, Giulio
Nisini, Roberto
Spada, Enea
Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy
title Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of a sars-cov-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an air force airport in central italy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277904
work_keys_str_mv AT verdepaola diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT marcantoniocinzia diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT costantinoangela diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT martinaantonio diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT simeonimatteo diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT taffonstefania diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT tritarellielena diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT campanellacarmelo diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT crestaraffaele diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT bruniroberto diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT ciccaglioneannarita diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT pisanigiulio diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT nisiniroberto diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly
AT spadaenea diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly