Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy
BACKGROUND: Most SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) validation studies have been performed on specimens from COVID-19 patients and negative controls or from mostly symptomatic individuals. Herein we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AFIAS COVID-19 Ag, hereinafter denominated as AFIA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277904 |
_version_ | 1784840098758524928 |
---|---|
author | Verde, Paola Marcantonio, Cinzia Costantino, Angela Martina, Antonio Simeoni, Matteo Taffon, Stefania Tritarelli, Elena Campanella, Carmelo Cresta, Raffaele Bruni, Roberto Ciccaglione, Anna Rita Pisani, Giulio Nisini, Roberto Spada, Enea |
author_facet | Verde, Paola Marcantonio, Cinzia Costantino, Angela Martina, Antonio Simeoni, Matteo Taffon, Stefania Tritarelli, Elena Campanella, Carmelo Cresta, Raffaele Bruni, Roberto Ciccaglione, Anna Rita Pisani, Giulio Nisini, Roberto Spada, Enea |
author_sort | Verde, Paola |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) validation studies have been performed on specimens from COVID-19 patients and negative controls or from mostly symptomatic individuals. Herein we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AFIAS COVID-19 Ag, hereinafter denominated as AFIAS, during a COVID-19 screening program surveillance testing conducted among personnel of an Italian military airport. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) were collected from study participants and were analysed by both AFIAS and RT-PCR assay. A questionnaire collecting demographic and exposure data were administered to all participants. AFIAS accuracy parameters including Cohen’s kappa (K) were determined. RESULTS: Overall, from November 2020 to April 2021, 1294 (NPSs) were collected from 1183 participants (88.6% males, 11.4% females; mean age were 41.3, median age 42). Forty-nine NPSs (3.78%) were positive by RT-PCR, while 54 NPSs were positive by AFIAS. Overall baseline sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 0.633, 0.981, 0.574, 0.985, respectively and K was 0.585 (moderate). AFIAS sensitivity tended to be higher for NPSs with higher viral load. A higher sensitivity (0.944) compared to the overall baseline sensitivity (0.633) was also found for NPSs from participants with COVID-19 compatible symptoms, for which K was 0.891 (almost perfect). Instead, AFIAS sensitivity was quite poor for NPSs from asymptomatic participants. Most false negative NPSs in this group had moderate viral load. CONCLUSION: Overall, AFIAS showed high specificity but only moderate sensitivity, mainly because of the high proportion of asymptomatic participants. However, AFIAS showed good sensitivity for NPSs with high viral load and nearly optimal accuracy parameters for NPSs from participants with COVID-19 compatible symptoms. Thus, taking into consideration its performance features, this test can be useful for COVID-19 case identification and management as well as for infection control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9704652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97046522022-11-29 Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy Verde, Paola Marcantonio, Cinzia Costantino, Angela Martina, Antonio Simeoni, Matteo Taffon, Stefania Tritarelli, Elena Campanella, Carmelo Cresta, Raffaele Bruni, Roberto Ciccaglione, Anna Rita Pisani, Giulio Nisini, Roberto Spada, Enea PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Most SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) validation studies have been performed on specimens from COVID-19 patients and negative controls or from mostly symptomatic individuals. Herein we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AFIAS COVID-19 Ag, hereinafter denominated as AFIAS, during a COVID-19 screening program surveillance testing conducted among personnel of an Italian military airport. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) were collected from study participants and were analysed by both AFIAS and RT-PCR assay. A questionnaire collecting demographic and exposure data were administered to all participants. AFIAS accuracy parameters including Cohen’s kappa (K) were determined. RESULTS: Overall, from November 2020 to April 2021, 1294 (NPSs) were collected from 1183 participants (88.6% males, 11.4% females; mean age were 41.3, median age 42). Forty-nine NPSs (3.78%) were positive by RT-PCR, while 54 NPSs were positive by AFIAS. Overall baseline sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 0.633, 0.981, 0.574, 0.985, respectively and K was 0.585 (moderate). AFIAS sensitivity tended to be higher for NPSs with higher viral load. A higher sensitivity (0.944) compared to the overall baseline sensitivity (0.633) was also found for NPSs from participants with COVID-19 compatible symptoms, for which K was 0.891 (almost perfect). Instead, AFIAS sensitivity was quite poor for NPSs from asymptomatic participants. Most false negative NPSs in this group had moderate viral load. CONCLUSION: Overall, AFIAS showed high specificity but only moderate sensitivity, mainly because of the high proportion of asymptomatic participants. However, AFIAS showed good sensitivity for NPSs with high viral load and nearly optimal accuracy parameters for NPSs from participants with COVID-19 compatible symptoms. Thus, taking into consideration its performance features, this test can be useful for COVID-19 case identification and management as well as for infection control. Public Library of Science 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9704652/ /pubmed/36441672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277904 Text en © 2022 Verde et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Verde, Paola Marcantonio, Cinzia Costantino, Angela Martina, Antonio Simeoni, Matteo Taffon, Stefania Tritarelli, Elena Campanella, Carmelo Cresta, Raffaele Bruni, Roberto Ciccaglione, Anna Rita Pisani, Giulio Nisini, Roberto Spada, Enea Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an Air Force airport in central Italy |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of a sars-cov-2 rapid antigen test among military and civilian personnel of an air force airport in central italy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verdepaola diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT marcantoniocinzia diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT costantinoangela diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT martinaantonio diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT simeonimatteo diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT taffonstefania diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT tritarellielena diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT campanellacarmelo diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT crestaraffaele diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT bruniroberto diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT ciccaglioneannarita diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT pisanigiulio diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT nisiniroberto diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly AT spadaenea diagnosticaccuracyofasarscov2rapidantigentestamongmilitaryandcivilianpersonnelofanairforceairportincentralitaly |