Cargando…

Low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: A comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models

Growing evidence links eye movements and cognitive functioning, however there is debate concerning what image content is fixated in natural scenes. Competing approaches have argued that low-level/feedforward and high-level/feedback factors contribute to gaze-guidance. We used one low-level model (Gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walter, Kerri, Bex, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277691
_version_ 1784840107755307008
author Walter, Kerri
Bex, Peter
author_facet Walter, Kerri
Bex, Peter
author_sort Walter, Kerri
collection PubMed
description Growing evidence links eye movements and cognitive functioning, however there is debate concerning what image content is fixated in natural scenes. Competing approaches have argued that low-level/feedforward and high-level/feedback factors contribute to gaze-guidance. We used one low-level model (Graph Based Visual Salience, GBVS) and a novel language-based high-level model (Global Vectors for Word Representation, GloVe) to predict gaze locations in a natural image search task, and we examined how fixated locations during this task vary under increasing levels of cognitive load. Participants (N = 30) freely viewed a series of 100 natural scenes for 10 seconds each. Between scenes, subjects identified a target object from the scene a specified number of trials (N) back among three distracter objects of the same type but from alternate scenes. The N-back was adaptive: N-back increased following two correct trials and decreased following one incorrect trial. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of gaze locations showed that as cognitive load increased, there was a significant increase in prediction power for GBVS, but not for GloVe. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the area under the ROC between the minimum and maximum N-back achieved across subjects for GloVe (t(29) = -1.062, p = 0.297), while there was a cohesive upwards trend for GBVS (t(29) = -1.975, p = .058), although not significant. A permutation analysis showed that gaze locations were correlated with GBVS indicating that salient features were more likely to be fixated. However, gaze locations were anti-correlated with GloVe, indicating that objects with low semantic consistency with the scene were more likely to be fixated. These results suggest that fixations are drawn towards salient low-level image features and this bias increases with cognitive load. Additionally, there is a bias towards fixating improbable objects that does not vary under increasing levels of cognitive load.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9704686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97046862022-11-29 Low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: A comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models Walter, Kerri Bex, Peter PLoS One Research Article Growing evidence links eye movements and cognitive functioning, however there is debate concerning what image content is fixated in natural scenes. Competing approaches have argued that low-level/feedforward and high-level/feedback factors contribute to gaze-guidance. We used one low-level model (Graph Based Visual Salience, GBVS) and a novel language-based high-level model (Global Vectors for Word Representation, GloVe) to predict gaze locations in a natural image search task, and we examined how fixated locations during this task vary under increasing levels of cognitive load. Participants (N = 30) freely viewed a series of 100 natural scenes for 10 seconds each. Between scenes, subjects identified a target object from the scene a specified number of trials (N) back among three distracter objects of the same type but from alternate scenes. The N-back was adaptive: N-back increased following two correct trials and decreased following one incorrect trial. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of gaze locations showed that as cognitive load increased, there was a significant increase in prediction power for GBVS, but not for GloVe. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the area under the ROC between the minimum and maximum N-back achieved across subjects for GloVe (t(29) = -1.062, p = 0.297), while there was a cohesive upwards trend for GBVS (t(29) = -1.975, p = .058), although not significant. A permutation analysis showed that gaze locations were correlated with GBVS indicating that salient features were more likely to be fixated. However, gaze locations were anti-correlated with GloVe, indicating that objects with low semantic consistency with the scene were more likely to be fixated. These results suggest that fixations are drawn towards salient low-level image features and this bias increases with cognitive load. Additionally, there is a bias towards fixating improbable objects that does not vary under increasing levels of cognitive load. Public Library of Science 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9704686/ /pubmed/36441789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277691 Text en © 2022 Walter, Bex https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Walter, Kerri
Bex, Peter
Low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: A comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models
title Low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: A comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models
title_full Low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: A comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models
title_fullStr Low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: A comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models
title_full_unstemmed Low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: A comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models
title_short Low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: A comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models
title_sort low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: a comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277691
work_keys_str_mv AT walterkerri lowlevelfactorsincreasegazeguidanceundercognitiveloadacomparisonofimagesalienceandsemanticsaliencemodels
AT bexpeter lowlevelfactorsincreasegazeguidanceundercognitiveloadacomparisonofimagesalienceandsemanticsaliencemodels