Cargando…
Is novel research worth doing? Evidence from peer review at 49 journals
There are long-standing concerns that peer review, which is foundational to scientific institutions like journals and funding agencies, favors conservative ideas over novel ones. We investigate the association between novelty and the acceptance of manuscripts submitted to a large sample of scientifi...
Autores principales: | Teplitskiy, Misha, Peng, Hao, Blasco, Andrea, Lakhani, Karim R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118046119 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Conservatism Gets Funded? A Field Experiment on the Role of Negative Information in Novel Project Evaluation
por: Lanei, Jacqueline N., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
What's your data worth?
por: Short, James E, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Risk versus reward: is this stock really worth it?
por: Kahn, Michael N, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
OMICS-based personalized oncology: if it is worth doing, it is worth doing well!
por: Hayes, Daniel F
Publicado: (2013) -
Pioneering research: a risk worth taking
por: Braben, Donald W
Publicado: (2004)