Cargando…
Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet?
The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review for understanding the availability and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches that could automatically identify and quantify computed tomography (CT) findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Systematic review, in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031848 |
_version_ | 1784840151099244544 |
---|---|
author | Hibi, Atsuhiro Jaberipour, Majid Cusimano, Michael D. Bilbily, Alexander Krishnan, Rahul G. Aviv, Richard I. Tyrrell, Pascal N. |
author_facet | Hibi, Atsuhiro Jaberipour, Majid Cusimano, Michael D. Bilbily, Alexander Krishnan, Rahul G. Aviv, Richard I. Tyrrell, Pascal N. |
author_sort | Hibi, Atsuhiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review for understanding the availability and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches that could automatically identify and quantify computed tomography (CT) findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Systematic review, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and SPIRIT-AI extension guidelines, with a search of 4 databases (Medline, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science) was performed to find AI studies that automated the clinical tasks for identifying and quantifying CT findings of TBI-related abnormalities. RESULTS: A total of 531 unique publications were reviewed, which resulted in 66 articles that met our inclusion criteria. The following components for identification and quantification regarding TBI were covered and automated by existing AI studies: identification of TBI-related abnormalities; classification of intracranial hemorrhage types; slice-, pixel-, and voxel-level localization of hemorrhage; measurement of midline shift; and measurement of hematoma volume. Automated identification of obliterated basal cisterns was not investigated in the existing AI studies. Most of the AI algorithms were based on deep neural networks that were trained on 2- or 3-dimensional CT imaging datasets. CONCLUSION: We identified several important TBI-related CT findings that can be automatically identified and quantified with AI. A combination of these techniques may provide useful tools to enhance reproducibility of TBI identification and quantification by supporting radiologists and clinicians in their TBI assessments and reducing subjective human factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9704869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97048692022-11-29 Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet? Hibi, Atsuhiro Jaberipour, Majid Cusimano, Michael D. Bilbily, Alexander Krishnan, Rahul G. Aviv, Richard I. Tyrrell, Pascal N. Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review for understanding the availability and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches that could automatically identify and quantify computed tomography (CT) findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Systematic review, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and SPIRIT-AI extension guidelines, with a search of 4 databases (Medline, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science) was performed to find AI studies that automated the clinical tasks for identifying and quantifying CT findings of TBI-related abnormalities. RESULTS: A total of 531 unique publications were reviewed, which resulted in 66 articles that met our inclusion criteria. The following components for identification and quantification regarding TBI were covered and automated by existing AI studies: identification of TBI-related abnormalities; classification of intracranial hemorrhage types; slice-, pixel-, and voxel-level localization of hemorrhage; measurement of midline shift; and measurement of hematoma volume. Automated identification of obliterated basal cisterns was not investigated in the existing AI studies. Most of the AI algorithms were based on deep neural networks that were trained on 2- or 3-dimensional CT imaging datasets. CONCLUSION: We identified several important TBI-related CT findings that can be automatically identified and quantified with AI. A combination of these techniques may provide useful tools to enhance reproducibility of TBI identification and quantification by supporting radiologists and clinicians in their TBI assessments and reducing subjective human factors. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9704869/ /pubmed/36451512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031848 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 6800 Hibi, Atsuhiro Jaberipour, Majid Cusimano, Michael D. Bilbily, Alexander Krishnan, Rahul G. Aviv, Richard I. Tyrrell, Pascal N. Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet? |
title | Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet? |
title_full | Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet? |
title_fullStr | Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet? |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet? |
title_short | Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet? |
title_sort | automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from ct scans: are we there yet? |
topic | 6800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031848 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hibiatsuhiro automatedidentificationandquantificationoftraumaticbraininjuryfromctscansarewethereyet AT jaberipourmajid automatedidentificationandquantificationoftraumaticbraininjuryfromctscansarewethereyet AT cusimanomichaeld automatedidentificationandquantificationoftraumaticbraininjuryfromctscansarewethereyet AT bilbilyalexander automatedidentificationandquantificationoftraumaticbraininjuryfromctscansarewethereyet AT krishnanrahulg automatedidentificationandquantificationoftraumaticbraininjuryfromctscansarewethereyet AT avivrichardi automatedidentificationandquantificationoftraumaticbraininjuryfromctscansarewethereyet AT tyrrellpascaln automatedidentificationandquantificationoftraumaticbraininjuryfromctscansarewethereyet |