Cargando…

Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA). METHOD: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Wu, Liu, Chuanyuan, Zhang, Lei, Zhong, Junqiao, He, Xianping, Fang, Chuanfa, Liu, Hongquan, Xia, Laiyang, Zuo, Zhengyun, Zhang, Leichang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032065
_version_ 1784840166390628352
author Zhong, Wu
Liu, Chuanyuan
Zhang, Lei
Zhong, Junqiao
He, Xianping
Fang, Chuanfa
Liu, Hongquan
Xia, Laiyang
Zuo, Zhengyun
Zhang, Leichang
author_facet Zhong, Wu
Liu, Chuanyuan
Zhang, Lei
Zhong, Junqiao
He, Xianping
Fang, Chuanfa
Liu, Hongquan
Xia, Laiyang
Zuo, Zhengyun
Zhang, Leichang
author_sort Zhong, Wu
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA). METHOD: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, prospective, and retrospective comparative studies regarding high- or modified low-tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. RESULTS: Of 641 potentially eligible articles, 16 studies with 3050 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (WMD −2.63, 95% CI −5.69 to 0.43; P = .09), the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD −0.35, 95% CI −1.60 to 0.20; P = .50), the number of apical lymph node yield (WMD −0.19, 95% CI −0.52 to 0.13; P = .24), the number of apical lymph node metastasis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.45; P = .40), rate of conversion to open surgery (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.09; P = .513), rate of urinary dysfunction (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.74; P = .34), rate of recurrence and metastasis (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.61; P = .64), 5-year survival rate (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.18; P = .42). However, this meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operating time (WMD −9.92, 95% CI −15.49 to −5.84; P = .0005), rate of diverting stom (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.92; P = .02), rate of anastomotic leakage (OR 2.673, 95% CI 1.91 to 3.62; P < .00001), time to first flatus (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.48; P = .002), time of hospitalization (WMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.15; P = .01) between the 2 surgical techniques. COCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that preserving the left colic artery is a safe, effective technique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer. nique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9704925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97049252022-11-29 Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis Zhong, Wu Liu, Chuanyuan Zhang, Lei Zhong, Junqiao He, Xianping Fang, Chuanfa Liu, Hongquan Xia, Laiyang Zuo, Zhengyun Zhang, Leichang Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA). METHOD: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, prospective, and retrospective comparative studies regarding high- or modified low-tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. RESULTS: Of 641 potentially eligible articles, 16 studies with 3050 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (WMD −2.63, 95% CI −5.69 to 0.43; P = .09), the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD −0.35, 95% CI −1.60 to 0.20; P = .50), the number of apical lymph node yield (WMD −0.19, 95% CI −0.52 to 0.13; P = .24), the number of apical lymph node metastasis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.45; P = .40), rate of conversion to open surgery (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.09; P = .513), rate of urinary dysfunction (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.74; P = .34), rate of recurrence and metastasis (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.61; P = .64), 5-year survival rate (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.18; P = .42). However, this meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operating time (WMD −9.92, 95% CI −15.49 to −5.84; P = .0005), rate of diverting stom (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.92; P = .02), rate of anastomotic leakage (OR 2.673, 95% CI 1.91 to 3.62; P < .00001), time to first flatus (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.48; P = .002), time of hospitalization (WMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.15; P = .01) between the 2 surgical techniques. COCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that preserving the left colic artery is a safe, effective technique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer. nique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9704925/ /pubmed/36451442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032065 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 4500
Zhong, Wu
Liu, Chuanyuan
Zhang, Lei
Zhong, Junqiao
He, Xianping
Fang, Chuanfa
Liu, Hongquan
Xia, Laiyang
Zuo, Zhengyun
Zhang, Leichang
Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis
title Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032065
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongwu comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT liuchuanyuan comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT zhanglei comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT zhongjunqiao comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT hexianping comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT fangchuanfa comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT liuhongquan comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT xialaiyang comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT zuozhengyun comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT zhangleichang comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis