Cargando…
Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis
The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA). METHOD: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032065 |
_version_ | 1784840166390628352 |
---|---|
author | Zhong, Wu Liu, Chuanyuan Zhang, Lei Zhong, Junqiao He, Xianping Fang, Chuanfa Liu, Hongquan Xia, Laiyang Zuo, Zhengyun Zhang, Leichang |
author_facet | Zhong, Wu Liu, Chuanyuan Zhang, Lei Zhong, Junqiao He, Xianping Fang, Chuanfa Liu, Hongquan Xia, Laiyang Zuo, Zhengyun Zhang, Leichang |
author_sort | Zhong, Wu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA). METHOD: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, prospective, and retrospective comparative studies regarding high- or modified low-tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. RESULTS: Of 641 potentially eligible articles, 16 studies with 3050 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (WMD −2.63, 95% CI −5.69 to 0.43; P = .09), the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD −0.35, 95% CI −1.60 to 0.20; P = .50), the number of apical lymph node yield (WMD −0.19, 95% CI −0.52 to 0.13; P = .24), the number of apical lymph node metastasis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.45; P = .40), rate of conversion to open surgery (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.09; P = .513), rate of urinary dysfunction (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.74; P = .34), rate of recurrence and metastasis (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.61; P = .64), 5-year survival rate (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.18; P = .42). However, this meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operating time (WMD −9.92, 95% CI −15.49 to −5.84; P = .0005), rate of diverting stom (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.92; P = .02), rate of anastomotic leakage (OR 2.673, 95% CI 1.91 to 3.62; P < .00001), time to first flatus (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.48; P = .002), time of hospitalization (WMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.15; P = .01) between the 2 surgical techniques. COCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that preserving the left colic artery is a safe, effective technique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer. nique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9704925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97049252022-11-29 Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis Zhong, Wu Liu, Chuanyuan Zhang, Lei Zhong, Junqiao He, Xianping Fang, Chuanfa Liu, Hongquan Xia, Laiyang Zuo, Zhengyun Zhang, Leichang Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA). METHOD: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, prospective, and retrospective comparative studies regarding high- or modified low-tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. RESULTS: Of 641 potentially eligible articles, 16 studies with 3050 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (WMD −2.63, 95% CI −5.69 to 0.43; P = .09), the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD −0.35, 95% CI −1.60 to 0.20; P = .50), the number of apical lymph node yield (WMD −0.19, 95% CI −0.52 to 0.13; P = .24), the number of apical lymph node metastasis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.45; P = .40), rate of conversion to open surgery (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.09; P = .513), rate of urinary dysfunction (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.74; P = .34), rate of recurrence and metastasis (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.61; P = .64), 5-year survival rate (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.18; P = .42). However, this meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operating time (WMD −9.92, 95% CI −15.49 to −5.84; P = .0005), rate of diverting stom (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.92; P = .02), rate of anastomotic leakage (OR 2.673, 95% CI 1.91 to 3.62; P < .00001), time to first flatus (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.48; P = .002), time of hospitalization (WMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.15; P = .01) between the 2 surgical techniques. COCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that preserving the left colic artery is a safe, effective technique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer. nique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9704925/ /pubmed/36451442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032065 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | 4500 Zhong, Wu Liu, Chuanyuan Zhang, Lei Zhong, Junqiao He, Xianping Fang, Chuanfa Liu, Hongquan Xia, Laiyang Zuo, Zhengyun Zhang, Leichang Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhongwu comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis AT liuchuanyuan comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis AT zhanglei comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis AT zhongjunqiao comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis AT hexianping comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis AT fangchuanfa comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis AT liuhongquan comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis AT xialaiyang comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis AT zuozhengyun comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis AT zhangleichang comparisonofhighormodifiedlowtieoftheinferiormesentericarteryinlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysis |