Cargando…

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross‐sectional survey

To carry out the translation and cultural adaptation of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument for use in Chinese and to analyse the validity and reliability of the adapted version of the questionnaire. In this quantitative, descriptive, cross‐sectional study, after translation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Xuemiao, Zan, Tao, Tang, Jing, Zhang, Dan, Zu, Wanting, Wang, Taiwei, Wang, Lisheng, Nie, Wenbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35307948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13802
_version_ 1784840217253904384
author Huang, Xuemiao
Zan, Tao
Tang, Jing
Zhang, Dan
Zu, Wanting
Wang, Taiwei
Wang, Lisheng
Nie, Wenbo
author_facet Huang, Xuemiao
Zan, Tao
Tang, Jing
Zhang, Dan
Zu, Wanting
Wang, Taiwei
Wang, Lisheng
Nie, Wenbo
author_sort Huang, Xuemiao
collection PubMed
description To carry out the translation and cultural adaptation of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument for use in Chinese and to analyse the validity and reliability of the adapted version of the questionnaire. In this quantitative, descriptive, cross‐sectional study, after translation of the questionnaire from English to Chinese, back‐translation, and assessment of equivalence between the original and back‐translated version by an expert panel, the Chinese version instrument was assessed by a convenience sample of registered nurses in several hospitals in cities of China. The internal consistency and content validity of the instrument was tested, and a confirmatory factor analysis was also performed. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the goodness of fit of the five‐factor model after the scale localization was not ideal. Therefore, confirmatory factor analysis is performed to obtain the three‐factor solution of comparative fit index, goodness‐of‐fit index, and adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index reaching the acceptable standard. The instrument score of nurses with wound care certification was significantly higher than that of nurses without wound care special certification. The adapted version of the instrument for Chinese nurses can be used as a tool to measure attitudes towards pressure injury prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9705164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97051642022-11-29 Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross‐sectional survey Huang, Xuemiao Zan, Tao Tang, Jing Zhang, Dan Zu, Wanting Wang, Taiwei Wang, Lisheng Nie, Wenbo Int Wound J Original Articles To carry out the translation and cultural adaptation of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument for use in Chinese and to analyse the validity and reliability of the adapted version of the questionnaire. In this quantitative, descriptive, cross‐sectional study, after translation of the questionnaire from English to Chinese, back‐translation, and assessment of equivalence between the original and back‐translated version by an expert panel, the Chinese version instrument was assessed by a convenience sample of registered nurses in several hospitals in cities of China. The internal consistency and content validity of the instrument was tested, and a confirmatory factor analysis was also performed. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the goodness of fit of the five‐factor model after the scale localization was not ideal. Therefore, confirmatory factor analysis is performed to obtain the three‐factor solution of comparative fit index, goodness‐of‐fit index, and adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index reaching the acceptable standard. The instrument score of nurses with wound care certification was significantly higher than that of nurses without wound care special certification. The adapted version of the instrument for Chinese nurses can be used as a tool to measure attitudes towards pressure injury prevention. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9705164/ /pubmed/35307948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13802 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Huang, Xuemiao
Zan, Tao
Tang, Jing
Zhang, Dan
Zu, Wanting
Wang, Taiwei
Wang, Lisheng
Nie, Wenbo
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross‐sectional survey
title Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross‐sectional survey
title_full Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross‐sectional survey
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross‐sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross‐sectional survey
title_short Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross‐sectional survey
title_sort psychometric properties of the chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: a cross‐sectional survey
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35307948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13802
work_keys_str_mv AT huangxuemiao psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionoftheattitudetowardspressureulcerpreventioninstrumentacrosssectionalsurvey
AT zantao psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionoftheattitudetowardspressureulcerpreventioninstrumentacrosssectionalsurvey
AT tangjing psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionoftheattitudetowardspressureulcerpreventioninstrumentacrosssectionalsurvey
AT zhangdan psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionoftheattitudetowardspressureulcerpreventioninstrumentacrosssectionalsurvey
AT zuwanting psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionoftheattitudetowardspressureulcerpreventioninstrumentacrosssectionalsurvey
AT wangtaiwei psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionoftheattitudetowardspressureulcerpreventioninstrumentacrosssectionalsurvey
AT wanglisheng psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionoftheattitudetowardspressureulcerpreventioninstrumentacrosssectionalsurvey
AT niewenbo psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionoftheattitudetowardspressureulcerpreventioninstrumentacrosssectionalsurvey