Cargando…

Statins and prostate cancer—hype or hope? The epidemiological perspective

BACKGROUND: Men using cholesterol-lowering statin medications have been found to have lower risks of both advanced and fatal prostate cancer in multiple registry-based studies and prospective cohort studies. Statin use has also been associated with longer survival among men already diagnosed with pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craig, Emma L., Stopsack, Konrad H., Evergren, Emma, Penn, Linda Z., Freedland, Stephen J., Hamilton, Robert J., Allott, Emma H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00554-1
_version_ 1784840233314942976
author Craig, Emma L.
Stopsack, Konrad H.
Evergren, Emma
Penn, Linda Z.
Freedland, Stephen J.
Hamilton, Robert J.
Allott, Emma H.
author_facet Craig, Emma L.
Stopsack, Konrad H.
Evergren, Emma
Penn, Linda Z.
Freedland, Stephen J.
Hamilton, Robert J.
Allott, Emma H.
author_sort Craig, Emma L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Men using cholesterol-lowering statin medications have been found to have lower risks of both advanced and fatal prostate cancer in multiple registry-based studies and prospective cohort studies. Statin use has also been associated with longer survival among men already diagnosed with prostate cancer. Mechanisms responsible for purported anti-cancer effects of statins are not well understood but may offer insight into prostate cancer biology. METHODS: We summarise epidemiological data from studies of statins and prostate cancer and discuss to what extent these findings can be interpreted as causal. Additionally, lipid-mediated and non-lipid-mediated mechanisms that may contribute to potential anti-cancer effects of statins are reviewed. Finally, we consider treatment settings and molecular subgroups of men who might benefit more than others from statin use in terms of prostate cancer-specific outcomes. RESULTS: Data from prospective observational studies generally reported a lower risk of fatal prostate cancer among statin users. There is some evidence for serum cholesterol-lowering as an indirect mechanism linking statins with advanced and fatal prostate cancer. Window-of-opportunity clinical trials show measurable levels of statins in prostate tissue highlighting potential for direct effects, whilst observational data suggest possible statin-driven modulation of prostate microenvironment inflammation. Additionally, emerging data from registry studies support a potential role for statins within the context of androgen deprivation therapy and anti-androgen treatment. CONCLUSION: Prospective and registry-based studies support a lower risk of advanced and fatal prostate cancer in statin users relative to non-users, as well as better outcomes among prostate cancer patients. The few randomised-controlled trials conducted so far have short follow-up, lack identified molecular subgroups, and do not provide additional support for the observational results. Consequently, additional evidence is required to determine which men may experience greatest benefit in terms of prostate cancer-specific outcomes and how statin effects may vary according to molecular tumour characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9705231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97052312022-11-30 Statins and prostate cancer—hype or hope? The epidemiological perspective Craig, Emma L. Stopsack, Konrad H. Evergren, Emma Penn, Linda Z. Freedland, Stephen J. Hamilton, Robert J. Allott, Emma H. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Review Article BACKGROUND: Men using cholesterol-lowering statin medications have been found to have lower risks of both advanced and fatal prostate cancer in multiple registry-based studies and prospective cohort studies. Statin use has also been associated with longer survival among men already diagnosed with prostate cancer. Mechanisms responsible for purported anti-cancer effects of statins are not well understood but may offer insight into prostate cancer biology. METHODS: We summarise epidemiological data from studies of statins and prostate cancer and discuss to what extent these findings can be interpreted as causal. Additionally, lipid-mediated and non-lipid-mediated mechanisms that may contribute to potential anti-cancer effects of statins are reviewed. Finally, we consider treatment settings and molecular subgroups of men who might benefit more than others from statin use in terms of prostate cancer-specific outcomes. RESULTS: Data from prospective observational studies generally reported a lower risk of fatal prostate cancer among statin users. There is some evidence for serum cholesterol-lowering as an indirect mechanism linking statins with advanced and fatal prostate cancer. Window-of-opportunity clinical trials show measurable levels of statins in prostate tissue highlighting potential for direct effects, whilst observational data suggest possible statin-driven modulation of prostate microenvironment inflammation. Additionally, emerging data from registry studies support a potential role for statins within the context of androgen deprivation therapy and anti-androgen treatment. CONCLUSION: Prospective and registry-based studies support a lower risk of advanced and fatal prostate cancer in statin users relative to non-users, as well as better outcomes among prostate cancer patients. The few randomised-controlled trials conducted so far have short follow-up, lack identified molecular subgroups, and do not provide additional support for the observational results. Consequently, additional evidence is required to determine which men may experience greatest benefit in terms of prostate cancer-specific outcomes and how statin effects may vary according to molecular tumour characteristics. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9705231/ /pubmed/35732821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00554-1 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Craig, Emma L.
Stopsack, Konrad H.
Evergren, Emma
Penn, Linda Z.
Freedland, Stephen J.
Hamilton, Robert J.
Allott, Emma H.
Statins and prostate cancer—hype or hope? The epidemiological perspective
title Statins and prostate cancer—hype or hope? The epidemiological perspective
title_full Statins and prostate cancer—hype or hope? The epidemiological perspective
title_fullStr Statins and prostate cancer—hype or hope? The epidemiological perspective
title_full_unstemmed Statins and prostate cancer—hype or hope? The epidemiological perspective
title_short Statins and prostate cancer—hype or hope? The epidemiological perspective
title_sort statins and prostate cancer—hype or hope? the epidemiological perspective
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00554-1
work_keys_str_mv AT craigemmal statinsandprostatecancerhypeorhopetheepidemiologicalperspective
AT stopsackkonradh statinsandprostatecancerhypeorhopetheepidemiologicalperspective
AT evergrenemma statinsandprostatecancerhypeorhopetheepidemiologicalperspective
AT pennlindaz statinsandprostatecancerhypeorhopetheepidemiologicalperspective
AT freedlandstephenj statinsandprostatecancerhypeorhopetheepidemiologicalperspective
AT hamiltonrobertj statinsandprostatecancerhypeorhopetheepidemiologicalperspective
AT allottemmah statinsandprostatecancerhypeorhopetheepidemiologicalperspective