Cargando…

Myocardial ischemia in patients with large prior infarction: Clinical decision making and review of literature

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) is a widely used technique for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Interpreting physicians rely on regional variations in myocardial radiotracer uptake betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asif, Talal, Doukky, Rami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2022.11.006
_version_ 1784840272392224768
author Asif, Talal
Doukky, Rami
author_facet Asif, Talal
Doukky, Rami
author_sort Asif, Talal
collection PubMed
description Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) is a widely used technique for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Interpreting physicians rely on regional variations in myocardial radiotracer uptake between rest and stress images to identify hemodynamically significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis. However, interpretation of MPI is very difficult in patients with large infarcts where there is no scintigraphically normal reference myocardium for comparison. In these patients, the stress and rest images appear similar due to balanced ischemia in the non-infarct territory. There are no clear guidelines on how to approach these cases. We present a case of MPI with a large right coronary artery territory (RCA) infarct where the left main (LM) coronary artery territory has no relative comparator and the images looked the same on stress and rest. However, the patient had multiple high-risk ancillary findings including electrocardiographic (ECG) changes with regadenoson, transient ischemic dilatation (TID), large severe inferior infarct, low myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR), but most notably increased right ventricular (RV) uptake on the stress images that was a subtle clue that we were dealing with LM equivalent in non-infarct zone. The coronary angiogram confirmed our findings. Through our case, we provide a comprehensive approach and review of literature on how to approach such challenging encounters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9705384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97053842022-11-30 Myocardial ischemia in patients with large prior infarction: Clinical decision making and review of literature Asif, Talal Doukky, Rami Radiol Case Rep Case Report Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) is a widely used technique for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Interpreting physicians rely on regional variations in myocardial radiotracer uptake between rest and stress images to identify hemodynamically significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis. However, interpretation of MPI is very difficult in patients with large infarcts where there is no scintigraphically normal reference myocardium for comparison. In these patients, the stress and rest images appear similar due to balanced ischemia in the non-infarct territory. There are no clear guidelines on how to approach these cases. We present a case of MPI with a large right coronary artery territory (RCA) infarct where the left main (LM) coronary artery territory has no relative comparator and the images looked the same on stress and rest. However, the patient had multiple high-risk ancillary findings including electrocardiographic (ECG) changes with regadenoson, transient ischemic dilatation (TID), large severe inferior infarct, low myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR), but most notably increased right ventricular (RV) uptake on the stress images that was a subtle clue that we were dealing with LM equivalent in non-infarct zone. The coronary angiogram confirmed our findings. Through our case, we provide a comprehensive approach and review of literature on how to approach such challenging encounters. Elsevier 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9705384/ /pubmed/36457789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2022.11.006 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of University of Washington. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Asif, Talal
Doukky, Rami
Myocardial ischemia in patients with large prior infarction: Clinical decision making and review of literature
title Myocardial ischemia in patients with large prior infarction: Clinical decision making and review of literature
title_full Myocardial ischemia in patients with large prior infarction: Clinical decision making and review of literature
title_fullStr Myocardial ischemia in patients with large prior infarction: Clinical decision making and review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Myocardial ischemia in patients with large prior infarction: Clinical decision making and review of literature
title_short Myocardial ischemia in patients with large prior infarction: Clinical decision making and review of literature
title_sort myocardial ischemia in patients with large prior infarction: clinical decision making and review of literature
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2022.11.006
work_keys_str_mv AT asiftalal myocardialischemiainpatientswithlargepriorinfarctionclinicaldecisionmakingandreviewofliterature
AT doukkyrami myocardialischemiainpatientswithlargepriorinfarctionclinicaldecisionmakingandreviewofliterature