Cargando…
Using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast MRI to shorten acquisition and reading time
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of automatically identifying normal scans in ultrafast breast MRI with artificial intelligence (AI) to increase efficiency and reduce workload. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 837 breast MRI examinations performed on 438 women from April 2016 to Oc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35614363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08863-8 |
_version_ | 1784840291228844032 |
---|---|
author | Jing, Xueping Wielema, Mirjam Cornelissen, Ludo J. van Gent, Margo Iwema, Willie M. Zheng, Sunyi Sijens, Paul E. Oudkerk, Matthijs Dorrius, Monique D. van Ooijen, Peter M.A. |
author_facet | Jing, Xueping Wielema, Mirjam Cornelissen, Ludo J. van Gent, Margo Iwema, Willie M. Zheng, Sunyi Sijens, Paul E. Oudkerk, Matthijs Dorrius, Monique D. van Ooijen, Peter M.A. |
author_sort | Jing, Xueping |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of automatically identifying normal scans in ultrafast breast MRI with artificial intelligence (AI) to increase efficiency and reduce workload. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 837 breast MRI examinations performed on 438 women from April 2016 to October 2019 were included. The left and right breasts in each examination were labelled normal (without suspicious lesions) or abnormal (with suspicious lesions) based on final interpretation. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of each breast were then used to train a deep learning model. A high sensitivity threshold was calculated based on the detection trade - off (DET) curve on the validation set. The performance of the model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis of the independent test set. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with the high sensitivity threshold were calculated. RESULTS: The independent test set consisted of 178 examinations of 149 patients (mean age, 44 years ± 14 [standard deviation]). The trained model achieved an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75–0.88) on the independent test set. Applying a threshold of 0.25 yielded a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI: 90%; 100%), an NPV of 98% (95% CI: 89%; 100%), a workload reduction of 15.7%, and a scan time reduction of 16.6%. CONCLUSION: This deep learning model has a high potential to help identify normal scans in ultrafast breast MRI and thereby reduce radiologists’ workload and scan time. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning in TWIST may eliminate the necessity of additional sequences for identifying normal breasts during MRI screening. • Workload and scanning time reductions of 15.7% and 16.6%, respectively, could be achieved with the cost of 1 (1 of 55) false negative prediction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08863-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9705471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97054712022-11-30 Using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast MRI to shorten acquisition and reading time Jing, Xueping Wielema, Mirjam Cornelissen, Ludo J. van Gent, Margo Iwema, Willie M. Zheng, Sunyi Sijens, Paul E. Oudkerk, Matthijs Dorrius, Monique D. van Ooijen, Peter M.A. Eur Radiol Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of automatically identifying normal scans in ultrafast breast MRI with artificial intelligence (AI) to increase efficiency and reduce workload. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 837 breast MRI examinations performed on 438 women from April 2016 to October 2019 were included. The left and right breasts in each examination were labelled normal (without suspicious lesions) or abnormal (with suspicious lesions) based on final interpretation. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of each breast were then used to train a deep learning model. A high sensitivity threshold was calculated based on the detection trade - off (DET) curve on the validation set. The performance of the model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis of the independent test set. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with the high sensitivity threshold were calculated. RESULTS: The independent test set consisted of 178 examinations of 149 patients (mean age, 44 years ± 14 [standard deviation]). The trained model achieved an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75–0.88) on the independent test set. Applying a threshold of 0.25 yielded a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI: 90%; 100%), an NPV of 98% (95% CI: 89%; 100%), a workload reduction of 15.7%, and a scan time reduction of 16.6%. CONCLUSION: This deep learning model has a high potential to help identify normal scans in ultrafast breast MRI and thereby reduce radiologists’ workload and scan time. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning in TWIST may eliminate the necessity of additional sequences for identifying normal breasts during MRI screening. • Workload and scanning time reductions of 15.7% and 16.6%, respectively, could be achieved with the cost of 1 (1 of 55) false negative prediction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08863-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9705471/ /pubmed/35614363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08863-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence Jing, Xueping Wielema, Mirjam Cornelissen, Ludo J. van Gent, Margo Iwema, Willie M. Zheng, Sunyi Sijens, Paul E. Oudkerk, Matthijs Dorrius, Monique D. van Ooijen, Peter M.A. Using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast MRI to shorten acquisition and reading time |
title | Using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast MRI to shorten acquisition and reading time |
title_full | Using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast MRI to shorten acquisition and reading time |
title_fullStr | Using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast MRI to shorten acquisition and reading time |
title_full_unstemmed | Using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast MRI to shorten acquisition and reading time |
title_short | Using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast MRI to shorten acquisition and reading time |
title_sort | using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast mri to shorten acquisition and reading time |
topic | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35614363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08863-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jingxueping usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime AT wielemamirjam usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime AT cornelissenludoj usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime AT vangentmargo usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime AT iwemawilliem usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime AT zhengsunyi usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime AT sijenspaule usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime AT oudkerkmatthijs usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime AT dorriusmoniqued usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime AT vanooijenpeterma usingdeeplearningtosafelyexcludelesionswithonlyultrafastbreastmritoshortenacquisitionandreadingtime |