Cargando…

Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity of dual-energy (DE) virtual non-contrast computed tomography (vNCT), generated from the excretory phase of a CT urogram, compared to true non-contrast CT (tNCT) for the detection of urinary calculi. METHODS: A search of multiple medical literature databases wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCoombe, Katherine, Dobeli, Karen, Meikle, Steven, Llewellyn, Stacey, Kench, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08939-5
_version_ 1784840294035881984
author McCoombe, Katherine
Dobeli, Karen
Meikle, Steven
Llewellyn, Stacey
Kench, Peter
author_facet McCoombe, Katherine
Dobeli, Karen
Meikle, Steven
Llewellyn, Stacey
Kench, Peter
author_sort McCoombe, Katherine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity of dual-energy (DE) virtual non-contrast computed tomography (vNCT), generated from the excretory phase of a CT urogram, compared to true non-contrast CT (tNCT) for the detection of urinary calculi. METHODS: A search of multiple medical literature databases was performed using predetermined search terms. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and bias risk was assessed by two independent reviewers using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool. Collated estimates of sensitivity were generated, and sources of heterogeneity were identified and reviewed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (1760 patients; 1740 urinary calculi) were included for sensitivity assessment. Pooled sensitivity for urinary calculi on vNCT was 78.1% (95% CI: 70.2 to 85.0%); however, heterogeneity between studies was very high (I(2) = 92.0%). Sources of heterogeneity between studies were explored through subgroup analysis by categorising studies according to slice thickness (≥ 2 mm and < 2 mm), use of oral hydration, and use of intravenous furosemide. Pooled sensitivity for detection of urinary calculi on vNCT for studies that used oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness was 92.2% (95% CI: 89.5 to 94.5%). Pooled specificity was not performed as true negatives were not reported in most studies. Potential sources of bias were identified in included studies. CONCLUSION: vNCT demonstrated a moderate pooled sensitivity compared to tNCT for the detection of urinary calculi in split bolus CT urogram protocols. However, subgroup analysis suggests higher sensitivity when employing oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness or increment. KEY POINTS: • vNCT demonstrated moderate pooled sensitivity for the detection of urinary calculi in split bolus CT urogram protocols. • Subgroup analysis suggested higher sensitivity with oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness or increment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08939-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9705483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97054832022-11-30 Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis McCoombe, Katherine Dobeli, Karen Meikle, Steven Llewellyn, Stacey Kench, Peter Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity of dual-energy (DE) virtual non-contrast computed tomography (vNCT), generated from the excretory phase of a CT urogram, compared to true non-contrast CT (tNCT) for the detection of urinary calculi. METHODS: A search of multiple medical literature databases was performed using predetermined search terms. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and bias risk was assessed by two independent reviewers using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool. Collated estimates of sensitivity were generated, and sources of heterogeneity were identified and reviewed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (1760 patients; 1740 urinary calculi) were included for sensitivity assessment. Pooled sensitivity for urinary calculi on vNCT was 78.1% (95% CI: 70.2 to 85.0%); however, heterogeneity between studies was very high (I(2) = 92.0%). Sources of heterogeneity between studies were explored through subgroup analysis by categorising studies according to slice thickness (≥ 2 mm and < 2 mm), use of oral hydration, and use of intravenous furosemide. Pooled sensitivity for detection of urinary calculi on vNCT for studies that used oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness was 92.2% (95% CI: 89.5 to 94.5%). Pooled specificity was not performed as true negatives were not reported in most studies. Potential sources of bias were identified in included studies. CONCLUSION: vNCT demonstrated a moderate pooled sensitivity compared to tNCT for the detection of urinary calculi in split bolus CT urogram protocols. However, subgroup analysis suggests higher sensitivity when employing oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness or increment. KEY POINTS: • vNCT demonstrated moderate pooled sensitivity for the detection of urinary calculi in split bolus CT urogram protocols. • Subgroup analysis suggested higher sensitivity with oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness or increment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08939-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9705483/ /pubmed/35763094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08939-5 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Computed Tomography
McCoombe, Katherine
Dobeli, Karen
Meikle, Steven
Llewellyn, Stacey
Kench, Peter
Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy ct urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Computed Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08939-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mccoombekatherine sensitivityofvirtualnoncontrastdualenergycturogramfordetectionofurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dobelikaren sensitivityofvirtualnoncontrastdualenergycturogramfordetectionofurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT meiklesteven sensitivityofvirtualnoncontrastdualenergycturogramfordetectionofurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT llewellynstacey sensitivityofvirtualnoncontrastdualenergycturogramfordetectionofurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kenchpeter sensitivityofvirtualnoncontrastdualenergycturogramfordetectionofurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis