Cargando…

A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved in the USA for tumours exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), or high tumour mutational burden (TMB), with regulatory and reimbursement applications in multiple other countries underway. As the estimated budget...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Yoon-Jung, O’Haire, Sophie, Franchini, Fanny, IJzerman, Maarten, Zalcberg, John, Macrae, Finlay, Canfell, Karen, Steinberg, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23319-1
_version_ 1784840310157737984
author Kang, Yoon-Jung
O’Haire, Sophie
Franchini, Fanny
IJzerman, Maarten
Zalcberg, John
Macrae, Finlay
Canfell, Karen
Steinberg, Julia
author_facet Kang, Yoon-Jung
O’Haire, Sophie
Franchini, Fanny
IJzerman, Maarten
Zalcberg, John
Macrae, Finlay
Canfell, Karen
Steinberg, Julia
author_sort Kang, Yoon-Jung
collection PubMed
description Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved in the USA for tumours exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), or high tumour mutational burden (TMB), with regulatory and reimbursement applications in multiple other countries underway. As the estimated budget impacts of future reimbursements depend on the size of the potential target population, we performed a scoping review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of these pan-tumour biomarkers in different cancers. We systematically searched Medline/Embase and included studies reporting the prevalence of dMMR/MSI/high TMB in solid tumours published 01/01/2018–31/01/2021. Meta-analyses were performed separately for the pan-cancer prevalence of each biomarker, and by cancer type and stage where possible. The searches identified 3890 papers, with 433 prevalence estimates for 32 different cancer types from 201 studies included in meta-analyses. The pooled overall prevalence of dMMR, MSI and high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/Mb) in pan-cancer studies was 2.9%, 2.7% and 14.0%, respectively. The prevalence profiles of dMMR/MSI and high TMB differed across cancer types. For example, endometrial, colorectal, small bowel and gastric cancers showed high prevalence of both dMMR and MSI (range: 8.7–26.8% and 8.5–21.9%, respectively) and high TMB (range: 8.5–43.0%), while cervical, esophageal, bladder/urothelial, lung and skin cancers showed low prevalence of dMMR and MSI (< 5%), but high prevalence of high TMB (range: 23.7–52.6%). For other cancer types, prevalence of all three biomarkers was generally low (< 5%). This structured review of dMMR/MSI/high TMB prevalence across cancers and for specific cancer types and stages provide timely evidence to inform budget impact forecasts in health technology assessments for drug approvals based on these pan-tumour biomarkers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9705554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97055542022-11-30 A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours Kang, Yoon-Jung O’Haire, Sophie Franchini, Fanny IJzerman, Maarten Zalcberg, John Macrae, Finlay Canfell, Karen Steinberg, Julia Sci Rep Article Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved in the USA for tumours exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), or high tumour mutational burden (TMB), with regulatory and reimbursement applications in multiple other countries underway. As the estimated budget impacts of future reimbursements depend on the size of the potential target population, we performed a scoping review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of these pan-tumour biomarkers in different cancers. We systematically searched Medline/Embase and included studies reporting the prevalence of dMMR/MSI/high TMB in solid tumours published 01/01/2018–31/01/2021. Meta-analyses were performed separately for the pan-cancer prevalence of each biomarker, and by cancer type and stage where possible. The searches identified 3890 papers, with 433 prevalence estimates for 32 different cancer types from 201 studies included in meta-analyses. The pooled overall prevalence of dMMR, MSI and high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/Mb) in pan-cancer studies was 2.9%, 2.7% and 14.0%, respectively. The prevalence profiles of dMMR/MSI and high TMB differed across cancer types. For example, endometrial, colorectal, small bowel and gastric cancers showed high prevalence of both dMMR and MSI (range: 8.7–26.8% and 8.5–21.9%, respectively) and high TMB (range: 8.5–43.0%), while cervical, esophageal, bladder/urothelial, lung and skin cancers showed low prevalence of dMMR and MSI (< 5%), but high prevalence of high TMB (range: 23.7–52.6%). For other cancer types, prevalence of all three biomarkers was generally low (< 5%). This structured review of dMMR/MSI/high TMB prevalence across cancers and for specific cancer types and stages provide timely evidence to inform budget impact forecasts in health technology assessments for drug approvals based on these pan-tumour biomarkers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9705554/ /pubmed/36443366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23319-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kang, Yoon-Jung
O’Haire, Sophie
Franchini, Fanny
IJzerman, Maarten
Zalcberg, John
Macrae, Finlay
Canfell, Karen
Steinberg, Julia
A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours
title A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours
title_full A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours
title_fullStr A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours
title_short A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours
title_sort scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dmmr, msi, high tmb) in different solid tumours
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23319-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kangyoonjung ascopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT ohairesophie ascopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT franchinifanny ascopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT ijzermanmaarten ascopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT zalcbergjohn ascopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT macraefinlay ascopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT canfellkaren ascopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT steinbergjulia ascopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT kangyoonjung scopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT ohairesophie scopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT franchinifanny scopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT ijzermanmaarten scopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT zalcbergjohn scopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT macraefinlay scopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT canfellkaren scopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours
AT steinbergjulia scopingreviewandmetaanalysisontheprevalenceofpantumourbiomarkersdmmrmsihightmbindifferentsolidtumours