Cargando…

Force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to measure the forces delivered by direct-printed aligners (DPA) in the vertical dimension and compare the force profile with traditional thermoformed aligners (TFA) and to investigate the impact of non-engaged surface patterns to the properties of DPA and TF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hertan, Evan, McCray, Julie, Bankhead, Brent, Kim, Ki Beom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00443-2
_version_ 1784840323382378496
author Hertan, Evan
McCray, Julie
Bankhead, Brent
Kim, Ki Beom
author_facet Hertan, Evan
McCray, Julie
Bankhead, Brent
Kim, Ki Beom
author_sort Hertan, Evan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to measure the forces delivered by direct-printed aligners (DPA) in the vertical dimension and compare the force profile with traditional thermoformed aligners (TFA) and to investigate the impact of non-engaged surface patterns to the properties of DPA and TFA. METHODS: A force-measuring appliance was fabricated capable of displacing the aligner in 0.10 mm increments and measuring the resultant force. Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (ATMOS 0.030″ American Orthodontics) and TC-85DAC resin (Graphy Inc) were used to create TFA and DPA, respectively. Aligners were temperature-controlled prior to and during testing to simulate the oral environment. The resultant forces from displacements ranging from 0.10 to 0.30 mm were measured. RESULTS: At intraoral temperatures, DPA demonstrated significantly less force than TFA. TFA demonstrated a substantial statistically significant increase in force with each 0.10 mm increase in vertical displacement. DPA demonstrated a much more consistent force profile across the range of displacements. The effects of surface patterns in both DPA and TFA were generally a decrease in force. Statistical significance of surface patterns was detected for TFA at displacements of 0.30 mm and greater and significant for DPA only at a displacement of 0.10 mm. Surface patterns in both DPA and the TFA did not show any statistical difference when assessing force proprieties. CONCLUSIONS: Forces delivered by aligners in the vertical dimension by DPA are more consistent and of lower magnitude than those of TFA aligners. Surface patterns were not capable of altering the force properties of both DPA and TFA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9705625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97056252022-11-30 Force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns Hertan, Evan McCray, Julie Bankhead, Brent Kim, Ki Beom Prog Orthod Short Report BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to measure the forces delivered by direct-printed aligners (DPA) in the vertical dimension and compare the force profile with traditional thermoformed aligners (TFA) and to investigate the impact of non-engaged surface patterns to the properties of DPA and TFA. METHODS: A force-measuring appliance was fabricated capable of displacing the aligner in 0.10 mm increments and measuring the resultant force. Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (ATMOS 0.030″ American Orthodontics) and TC-85DAC resin (Graphy Inc) were used to create TFA and DPA, respectively. Aligners were temperature-controlled prior to and during testing to simulate the oral environment. The resultant forces from displacements ranging from 0.10 to 0.30 mm were measured. RESULTS: At intraoral temperatures, DPA demonstrated significantly less force than TFA. TFA demonstrated a substantial statistically significant increase in force with each 0.10 mm increase in vertical displacement. DPA demonstrated a much more consistent force profile across the range of displacements. The effects of surface patterns in both DPA and TFA were generally a decrease in force. Statistical significance of surface patterns was detected for TFA at displacements of 0.30 mm and greater and significant for DPA only at a displacement of 0.10 mm. Surface patterns in both DPA and the TFA did not show any statistical difference when assessing force proprieties. CONCLUSIONS: Forces delivered by aligners in the vertical dimension by DPA are more consistent and of lower magnitude than those of TFA aligners. Surface patterns were not capable of altering the force properties of both DPA and TFA. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9705625/ /pubmed/36443390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00443-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Short Report
Hertan, Evan
McCray, Julie
Bankhead, Brent
Kim, Ki Beom
Force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns
title Force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns
title_full Force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns
title_fullStr Force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns
title_full_unstemmed Force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns
title_short Force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns
title_sort force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9705625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00443-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hertanevan forceprofileassessmentofdirectprintedalignersversusthermoformedalignersandtheeffectsofnonengagedsurfacepatterns
AT mccrayjulie forceprofileassessmentofdirectprintedalignersversusthermoformedalignersandtheeffectsofnonengagedsurfacepatterns
AT bankheadbrent forceprofileassessmentofdirectprintedalignersversusthermoformedalignersandtheeffectsofnonengagedsurfacepatterns
AT kimkibeom forceprofileassessmentofdirectprintedalignersversusthermoformedalignersandtheeffectsofnonengagedsurfacepatterns