Cargando…
The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity
BACKGROUND: A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of physical activity (PA). This article describes the development process of the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework, a tool to assess government policie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac062 |
_version_ | 1784840439927406592 |
---|---|
author | Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna García Bengoechea, Enrique |
author_facet | Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna García Bengoechea, Enrique |
author_sort | Woods, Catherine B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of physical activity (PA). This article describes the development process of the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework, a tool to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organizations, a PA policy audit of four European countries, and a systematic review of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops were conducted, where quantitative and qualitative data, alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations, were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualized as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two-components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain conclude the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI good practice statements will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9706113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97061132022-11-30 The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna García Bengoechea, Enrique Eur J Public Health Supplement Papers BACKGROUND: A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of physical activity (PA). This article describes the development process of the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework, a tool to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organizations, a PA policy audit of four European countries, and a systematic review of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops were conducted, where quantitative and qualitative data, alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations, were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualized as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two-components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain conclude the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI good practice statements will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity. Oxford University Press 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9706113/ /pubmed/36444111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac062 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Supplement Papers Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna García Bengoechea, Enrique The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title | The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_full | The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_fullStr | The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_full_unstemmed | The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_short | The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
title_sort | physical activity environment policy index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity |
topic | Supplement Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodscatherineb thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT kellyliam thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT volfkevin thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT geliuspeter thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT messingsven thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT forbergersarah thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT lakerveldjeroen thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT denbravernicoletter thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT zukowskajoanna thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT garciabengoecheaenrique thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT woodscatherineb physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT kellyliam physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT volfkevin physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT geliuspeter physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT messingsven physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT forbergersarah physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT lakerveldjeroen physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT denbravernicoletter physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT zukowskajoanna physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity AT garciabengoecheaenrique physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity |