Cargando…

The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity

BACKGROUND: A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of physical activity (PA). This article describes the development process of the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework, a tool to assess government policie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, Catherine B, Kelly, Liam, Volf, Kevin, Gelius, Peter, Messing, Sven, Forberger, Sarah, Lakerveld, Jeroen, den Braver, Nicolette R, Zukowska, Joanna, García Bengoechea, Enrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac062
_version_ 1784840439927406592
author Woods, Catherine B
Kelly, Liam
Volf, Kevin
Gelius, Peter
Messing, Sven
Forberger, Sarah
Lakerveld, Jeroen
den Braver, Nicolette R
Zukowska, Joanna
García Bengoechea, Enrique
author_facet Woods, Catherine B
Kelly, Liam
Volf, Kevin
Gelius, Peter
Messing, Sven
Forberger, Sarah
Lakerveld, Jeroen
den Braver, Nicolette R
Zukowska, Joanna
García Bengoechea, Enrique
author_sort Woods, Catherine B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of physical activity (PA). This article describes the development process of the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework, a tool to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organizations, a PA policy audit of four European countries, and a systematic review of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops were conducted, where quantitative and qualitative data, alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations, were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualized as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two-components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain conclude the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI good practice statements will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9706113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97061132022-11-30 The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity Woods, Catherine B Kelly, Liam Volf, Kevin Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Lakerveld, Jeroen den Braver, Nicolette R Zukowska, Joanna García Bengoechea, Enrique Eur J Public Health Supplement Papers BACKGROUND: A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of physical activity (PA). This article describes the development process of the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework, a tool to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organizations, a PA policy audit of four European countries, and a systematic review of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops were conducted, where quantitative and qualitative data, alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations, were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualized as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two-components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain conclude the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI good practice statements will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity. Oxford University Press 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9706113/ /pubmed/36444111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac062 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Papers
Woods, Catherine B
Kelly, Liam
Volf, Kevin
Gelius, Peter
Messing, Sven
Forberger, Sarah
Lakerveld, Jeroen
den Braver, Nicolette R
Zukowska, Joanna
García Bengoechea, Enrique
The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_full The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_fullStr The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_full_unstemmed The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_short The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity
title_sort physical activity environment policy index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity
topic Supplement Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac062
work_keys_str_mv AT woodscatherineb thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT kellyliam thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT volfkevin thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT geliuspeter thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT messingsven thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT forbergersarah thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT lakerveldjeroen thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT denbravernicoletter thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT zukowskajoanna thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT garciabengoecheaenrique thephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT woodscatherineb physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT kellyliam physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT volfkevin physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT geliuspeter physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT messingsven physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT forbergersarah physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT lakerveldjeroen physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT denbravernicoletter physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT zukowskajoanna physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity
AT garciabengoecheaenrique physicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexformonitoringgovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivity