Cargando…

Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network

BACKGROUND: An upsurge in policy evaluation research within public health sciences has led to multi-disciplinary research networks like the ‘Policy Evaluation Network’ (PEN). This multi-disciplinary collaboration highlighted the need for consensus on clear, common terminology and definitions to faci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Liam, Twohig, Cliona, Woods, Catherine B, Luszczynska, Aleksandra, Murrin, Celine, Lien, Nanna, Meshkovska, Biljana, Kamphuis, Carlijn B M, Poelman, Maartje P, Terragani, Laura, Forberger, Sarah, Hebestreit, Antje, Ahrens, Wolfgang, Harrington, Janas M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac147
_version_ 1784840441673285632
author Kelly, Liam
Twohig, Cliona
Woods, Catherine B
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Murrin, Celine
Lien, Nanna
Meshkovska, Biljana
Kamphuis, Carlijn B M
Poelman, Maartje P
Terragani, Laura
Forberger, Sarah
Hebestreit, Antje
Ahrens, Wolfgang
Harrington, Janas M
author_facet Kelly, Liam
Twohig, Cliona
Woods, Catherine B
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Murrin, Celine
Lien, Nanna
Meshkovska, Biljana
Kamphuis, Carlijn B M
Poelman, Maartje P
Terragani, Laura
Forberger, Sarah
Hebestreit, Antje
Ahrens, Wolfgang
Harrington, Janas M
author_sort Kelly, Liam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An upsurge in policy evaluation research within public health sciences has led to multi-disciplinary research networks like the ‘Policy Evaluation Network’ (PEN). This multi-disciplinary collaboration highlighted the need for consensus on clear, common terminology and definitions to facilitate the multi-disciplinary research. This article outlines the development process of the PEN definitions glossary tool, with a focus on the key domains of policy design, implementation and outcomes as they apply to physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary behaviours. METHODS: A project specific participatory process was undertaken, involving PEN researchers (n = 48) from seven European countries across various disciplinary backgrounds. All involved researchers were invited to identify and collate definitions that were commonly used in their research field. Terms and definitions were discussed and debated during three online workshops. Subsequently, the definitions were discussed and refined until consensus was reached. RESULTS: Consensus definitions for 93 terms related to the evaluation of policy design, implementation and outcomes are provided. Consensus was reached on a range of terms where the terms were understood and used differently across represented disciplines (e.g. ‘Outcome’ and ‘Impact’). A conceptual ‘Inter-relations in policy-related concepts’ diagram was developed to enable navigation through an online database with key terms. CONCLUSIONS: The definitions resulting from this participatory process has supported PEN researchers and practitioners across disciplines to reach a shared understanding of different terms related to policy evaluation. Thus, providing a platform for avoiding conflicting use of the same terms in differing contexts over the course of the PEN work programme, facilitating clear and consistent communication, and allowing for clarity within collaborative multi-disciplinary projects and in public-facing messages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9706120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97061202022-11-30 Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network Kelly, Liam Twohig, Cliona Woods, Catherine B Luszczynska, Aleksandra Murrin, Celine Lien, Nanna Meshkovska, Biljana Kamphuis, Carlijn B M Poelman, Maartje P Terragani, Laura Forberger, Sarah Hebestreit, Antje Ahrens, Wolfgang Harrington, Janas M Eur J Public Health Supplement Papers BACKGROUND: An upsurge in policy evaluation research within public health sciences has led to multi-disciplinary research networks like the ‘Policy Evaluation Network’ (PEN). This multi-disciplinary collaboration highlighted the need for consensus on clear, common terminology and definitions to facilitate the multi-disciplinary research. This article outlines the development process of the PEN definitions glossary tool, with a focus on the key domains of policy design, implementation and outcomes as they apply to physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary behaviours. METHODS: A project specific participatory process was undertaken, involving PEN researchers (n = 48) from seven European countries across various disciplinary backgrounds. All involved researchers were invited to identify and collate definitions that were commonly used in their research field. Terms and definitions were discussed and debated during three online workshops. Subsequently, the definitions were discussed and refined until consensus was reached. RESULTS: Consensus definitions for 93 terms related to the evaluation of policy design, implementation and outcomes are provided. Consensus was reached on a range of terms where the terms were understood and used differently across represented disciplines (e.g. ‘Outcome’ and ‘Impact’). A conceptual ‘Inter-relations in policy-related concepts’ diagram was developed to enable navigation through an online database with key terms. CONCLUSIONS: The definitions resulting from this participatory process has supported PEN researchers and practitioners across disciplines to reach a shared understanding of different terms related to policy evaluation. Thus, providing a platform for avoiding conflicting use of the same terms in differing contexts over the course of the PEN work programme, facilitating clear and consistent communication, and allowing for clarity within collaborative multi-disciplinary projects and in public-facing messages. Oxford University Press 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9706120/ /pubmed/36444104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac147 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Papers
Kelly, Liam
Twohig, Cliona
Woods, Catherine B
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Murrin, Celine
Lien, Nanna
Meshkovska, Biljana
Kamphuis, Carlijn B M
Poelman, Maartje P
Terragani, Laura
Forberger, Sarah
Hebestreit, Antje
Ahrens, Wolfgang
Harrington, Janas M
Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network
title Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network
title_full Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network
title_fullStr Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network
title_full_unstemmed Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network
title_short Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network
title_sort reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the policy evaluation network
topic Supplement Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac147
work_keys_str_mv AT kellyliam reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT twohigcliona reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT woodscatherineb reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT luszczynskaaleksandra reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT murrinceline reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT liennanna reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT meshkovskabiljana reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT kamphuiscarlijnbm reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT poelmanmaartjep reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT terraganilaura reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT forbergersarah reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT hebestreitantje reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT ahrenswolfgang reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork
AT harringtonjanasm reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork