Cargando…
Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network
BACKGROUND: An upsurge in policy evaluation research within public health sciences has led to multi-disciplinary research networks like the ‘Policy Evaluation Network’ (PEN). This multi-disciplinary collaboration highlighted the need for consensus on clear, common terminology and definitions to faci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac147 |
_version_ | 1784840441673285632 |
---|---|
author | Kelly, Liam Twohig, Cliona Woods, Catherine B Luszczynska, Aleksandra Murrin, Celine Lien, Nanna Meshkovska, Biljana Kamphuis, Carlijn B M Poelman, Maartje P Terragani, Laura Forberger, Sarah Hebestreit, Antje Ahrens, Wolfgang Harrington, Janas M |
author_facet | Kelly, Liam Twohig, Cliona Woods, Catherine B Luszczynska, Aleksandra Murrin, Celine Lien, Nanna Meshkovska, Biljana Kamphuis, Carlijn B M Poelman, Maartje P Terragani, Laura Forberger, Sarah Hebestreit, Antje Ahrens, Wolfgang Harrington, Janas M |
author_sort | Kelly, Liam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An upsurge in policy evaluation research within public health sciences has led to multi-disciplinary research networks like the ‘Policy Evaluation Network’ (PEN). This multi-disciplinary collaboration highlighted the need for consensus on clear, common terminology and definitions to facilitate the multi-disciplinary research. This article outlines the development process of the PEN definitions glossary tool, with a focus on the key domains of policy design, implementation and outcomes as they apply to physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary behaviours. METHODS: A project specific participatory process was undertaken, involving PEN researchers (n = 48) from seven European countries across various disciplinary backgrounds. All involved researchers were invited to identify and collate definitions that were commonly used in their research field. Terms and definitions were discussed and debated during three online workshops. Subsequently, the definitions were discussed and refined until consensus was reached. RESULTS: Consensus definitions for 93 terms related to the evaluation of policy design, implementation and outcomes are provided. Consensus was reached on a range of terms where the terms were understood and used differently across represented disciplines (e.g. ‘Outcome’ and ‘Impact’). A conceptual ‘Inter-relations in policy-related concepts’ diagram was developed to enable navigation through an online database with key terms. CONCLUSIONS: The definitions resulting from this participatory process has supported PEN researchers and practitioners across disciplines to reach a shared understanding of different terms related to policy evaluation. Thus, providing a platform for avoiding conflicting use of the same terms in differing contexts over the course of the PEN work programme, facilitating clear and consistent communication, and allowing for clarity within collaborative multi-disciplinary projects and in public-facing messages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9706120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97061202022-11-30 Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network Kelly, Liam Twohig, Cliona Woods, Catherine B Luszczynska, Aleksandra Murrin, Celine Lien, Nanna Meshkovska, Biljana Kamphuis, Carlijn B M Poelman, Maartje P Terragani, Laura Forberger, Sarah Hebestreit, Antje Ahrens, Wolfgang Harrington, Janas M Eur J Public Health Supplement Papers BACKGROUND: An upsurge in policy evaluation research within public health sciences has led to multi-disciplinary research networks like the ‘Policy Evaluation Network’ (PEN). This multi-disciplinary collaboration highlighted the need for consensus on clear, common terminology and definitions to facilitate the multi-disciplinary research. This article outlines the development process of the PEN definitions glossary tool, with a focus on the key domains of policy design, implementation and outcomes as they apply to physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary behaviours. METHODS: A project specific participatory process was undertaken, involving PEN researchers (n = 48) from seven European countries across various disciplinary backgrounds. All involved researchers were invited to identify and collate definitions that were commonly used in their research field. Terms and definitions were discussed and debated during three online workshops. Subsequently, the definitions were discussed and refined until consensus was reached. RESULTS: Consensus definitions for 93 terms related to the evaluation of policy design, implementation and outcomes are provided. Consensus was reached on a range of terms where the terms were understood and used differently across represented disciplines (e.g. ‘Outcome’ and ‘Impact’). A conceptual ‘Inter-relations in policy-related concepts’ diagram was developed to enable navigation through an online database with key terms. CONCLUSIONS: The definitions resulting from this participatory process has supported PEN researchers and practitioners across disciplines to reach a shared understanding of different terms related to policy evaluation. Thus, providing a platform for avoiding conflicting use of the same terms in differing contexts over the course of the PEN work programme, facilitating clear and consistent communication, and allowing for clarity within collaborative multi-disciplinary projects and in public-facing messages. Oxford University Press 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9706120/ /pubmed/36444104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac147 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Supplement Papers Kelly, Liam Twohig, Cliona Woods, Catherine B Luszczynska, Aleksandra Murrin, Celine Lien, Nanna Meshkovska, Biljana Kamphuis, Carlijn B M Poelman, Maartje P Terragani, Laura Forberger, Sarah Hebestreit, Antje Ahrens, Wolfgang Harrington, Janas M Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network |
title | Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network |
title_full | Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network |
title_fullStr | Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network |
title_full_unstemmed | Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network |
title_short | Reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the Policy Evaluation Network |
title_sort | reaching consensus on definitions for food and physical activity policies: experience from the policy evaluation network |
topic | Supplement Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kellyliam reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT twohigcliona reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT woodscatherineb reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT luszczynskaaleksandra reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT murrinceline reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT liennanna reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT meshkovskabiljana reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT kamphuiscarlijnbm reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT poelmanmaartjep reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT terraganilaura reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT forbergersarah reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT hebestreitantje reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT ahrenswolfgang reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork AT harringtonjanasm reachingconsensusondefinitionsforfoodandphysicalactivitypoliciesexperiencefromthepolicyevaluationnetwork |