Cargando…

Research Software vs. Research Data II: Protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation in the Open Science context

Background: Open Science seeks to render research outputs visible, accessible and reusable. In this context, Research Data and Research Software sharing and dissemination issues provide real challenges to the scientific community, as consequence of recent progress in political, legal and funding req...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomez-Diaz, Teresa, Recio, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483317
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.78459.2
_version_ 1784840448181796864
author Gomez-Diaz, Teresa
Recio, Tomas
author_facet Gomez-Diaz, Teresa
Recio, Tomas
author_sort Gomez-Diaz, Teresa
collection PubMed
description Background: Open Science seeks to render research outputs visible, accessible and reusable. In this context, Research Data and Research Software sharing and dissemination issues provide real challenges to the scientific community, as consequence of recent progress in political, legal and funding requirements. Methods: We take advantage from the approach we have developed in a precedent publication, in which we have highlighted the similarities between the Research Data and Research Software definitions. Results: The similarities between Research Data and Research Software definitions can be extended to propose protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation derived from those already proposed for Research Software dissemination and evaluation. We also analyze FAIR principles for these outputs. Conclusions: Our proposals here provide concrete instructions for Research Data and Research Software producers to make them more findable and accessible, as well as arguments to choose suitable dissemination platforms to complete the FAIR framework. Future work could analyze the potential extension of this parallelism to other kinds of research outputs that are disseminated under similar conditions to those of Research Data and Research Software, that is, without widely accepted publication procedures involving editors or other external actors and where the dissemination is usually restricted through the hands of the production team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9706143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97061432022-12-07 Research Software vs. Research Data II: Protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation in the Open Science context Gomez-Diaz, Teresa Recio, Tomas F1000Res Research Article Background: Open Science seeks to render research outputs visible, accessible and reusable. In this context, Research Data and Research Software sharing and dissemination issues provide real challenges to the scientific community, as consequence of recent progress in political, legal and funding requirements. Methods: We take advantage from the approach we have developed in a precedent publication, in which we have highlighted the similarities between the Research Data and Research Software definitions. Results: The similarities between Research Data and Research Software definitions can be extended to propose protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation derived from those already proposed for Research Software dissemination and evaluation. We also analyze FAIR principles for these outputs. Conclusions: Our proposals here provide concrete instructions for Research Data and Research Software producers to make them more findable and accessible, as well as arguments to choose suitable dissemination platforms to complete the FAIR framework. Future work could analyze the potential extension of this parallelism to other kinds of research outputs that are disseminated under similar conditions to those of Research Data and Research Software, that is, without widely accepted publication procedures involving editors or other external actors and where the dissemination is usually restricted through the hands of the production team. F1000 Research Limited 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9706143/ /pubmed/36483317 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.78459.2 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Gomez-Diaz T and Recio T https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gomez-Diaz, Teresa
Recio, Tomas
Research Software vs. Research Data II: Protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation in the Open Science context
title Research Software vs. Research Data II: Protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation in the Open Science context
title_full Research Software vs. Research Data II: Protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation in the Open Science context
title_fullStr Research Software vs. Research Data II: Protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation in the Open Science context
title_full_unstemmed Research Software vs. Research Data II: Protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation in the Open Science context
title_short Research Software vs. Research Data II: Protocols for Research Data dissemination and evaluation in the Open Science context
title_sort research software vs. research data ii: protocols for research data dissemination and evaluation in the open science context
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483317
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.78459.2
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezdiazteresa researchsoftwarevsresearchdataiiprotocolsforresearchdatadisseminationandevaluationintheopensciencecontext
AT reciotomas researchsoftwarevsresearchdataiiprotocolsforresearchdatadisseminationandevaluationintheopensciencecontext