Cargando…

Analysis of factors influencing infrared extinction area of explosive smokescreen

OBJECTIVES: Comparative studies of different smokescreen designs are essential to determine differences in extinction performance. This study aims to investigate the extinction performance of explosive smokescreen under different conditions, and to provide an evaluation method for the optimal design...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Haihao, Gu, Youlin, Fang, Jiajie, Hu, Yihua, Cao, Hao, Ding, Wanying, Wang, Xinyu, Chen, Xi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36458317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11818
_version_ 1784840456808431616
author He, Haihao
Gu, Youlin
Fang, Jiajie
Hu, Yihua
Cao, Hao
Ding, Wanying
Wang, Xinyu
Chen, Xi
author_facet He, Haihao
Gu, Youlin
Fang, Jiajie
Hu, Yihua
Cao, Hao
Ding, Wanying
Wang, Xinyu
Chen, Xi
author_sort He, Haihao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Comparative studies of different smokescreen designs are essential to determine differences in extinction performance. This study aims to investigate the extinction performance of explosive smokescreen under different conditions, and to provide an evaluation method for the optimal design of its charge structure. METHODS: The process of formation of the smokescreen with a cylindrical charge structure is described based on the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. The blast radius and particle density distribution of the smokescreen were calculated for different charge structures and charge ratios through simulations. Lambert–Beer's law was combined to obtain the infrared extinction area. An analysis was then conducted to determine the influence of the number of baffles in the charge structure and charge ratio on the extinction performance of the smokescreen. Field tests were conducted to verify the simulation results. RESULTS: Increasing the number of baffles in the projectile structure made the particle distribution of the smokescreen more uniform and resulted in a larger infrared extinction area. An increase in the explosive quantity, made the smokescreen more dispersed. However, too much of the explosives caused the smokescreen to be sparse, reducing the infrared extinction area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9706176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97061762022-11-30 Analysis of factors influencing infrared extinction area of explosive smokescreen He, Haihao Gu, Youlin Fang, Jiajie Hu, Yihua Cao, Hao Ding, Wanying Wang, Xinyu Chen, Xi Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVES: Comparative studies of different smokescreen designs are essential to determine differences in extinction performance. This study aims to investigate the extinction performance of explosive smokescreen under different conditions, and to provide an evaluation method for the optimal design of its charge structure. METHODS: The process of formation of the smokescreen with a cylindrical charge structure is described based on the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. The blast radius and particle density distribution of the smokescreen were calculated for different charge structures and charge ratios through simulations. Lambert–Beer's law was combined to obtain the infrared extinction area. An analysis was then conducted to determine the influence of the number of baffles in the charge structure and charge ratio on the extinction performance of the smokescreen. Field tests were conducted to verify the simulation results. RESULTS: Increasing the number of baffles in the projectile structure made the particle distribution of the smokescreen more uniform and resulted in a larger infrared extinction area. An increase in the explosive quantity, made the smokescreen more dispersed. However, too much of the explosives caused the smokescreen to be sparse, reducing the infrared extinction area. Elsevier 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9706176/ /pubmed/36458317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11818 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Haihao
Gu, Youlin
Fang, Jiajie
Hu, Yihua
Cao, Hao
Ding, Wanying
Wang, Xinyu
Chen, Xi
Analysis of factors influencing infrared extinction area of explosive smokescreen
title Analysis of factors influencing infrared extinction area of explosive smokescreen
title_full Analysis of factors influencing infrared extinction area of explosive smokescreen
title_fullStr Analysis of factors influencing infrared extinction area of explosive smokescreen
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of factors influencing infrared extinction area of explosive smokescreen
title_short Analysis of factors influencing infrared extinction area of explosive smokescreen
title_sort analysis of factors influencing infrared extinction area of explosive smokescreen
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36458317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11818
work_keys_str_mv AT hehaihao analysisoffactorsinfluencinginfraredextinctionareaofexplosivesmokescreen
AT guyoulin analysisoffactorsinfluencinginfraredextinctionareaofexplosivesmokescreen
AT fangjiajie analysisoffactorsinfluencinginfraredextinctionareaofexplosivesmokescreen
AT huyihua analysisoffactorsinfluencinginfraredextinctionareaofexplosivesmokescreen
AT caohao analysisoffactorsinfluencinginfraredextinctionareaofexplosivesmokescreen
AT dingwanying analysisoffactorsinfluencinginfraredextinctionareaofexplosivesmokescreen
AT wangxinyu analysisoffactorsinfluencinginfraredextinctionareaofexplosivesmokescreen
AT chenxi analysisoffactorsinfluencinginfraredextinctionareaofexplosivesmokescreen