Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy and added value of blood-based protein biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of aggregate and individual participant data

BACKGROUND: Novel blood-based protein biomarkers may be of value for efficient, accurate, and non-invasive diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of newly recognized blood-based protein biomarkers for detecting pancreatic cancer, and investigates their added valu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyd, Lenka N.C., Ali, Mahsoem, Leeflang, Mariska M.G., Treglia, Giorgio, de Vries, Ralph, Le Large, Tessa Y.S., Besselink, Marc G., Giovannetti, Elisa, van Laarhoven, Hanneke W.M., Kazemier, Geert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101747
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Novel blood-based protein biomarkers may be of value for efficient, accurate, and non-invasive diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of newly recognized blood-based protein biomarkers for detecting pancreatic cancer, and investigates their added value to CA19-9, the common blood-based biomarker in clinical use for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Wiley/Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception until June 2022. A meta-analysis of aggregate and individual participant data was conducted using frequentist and Bayesian hierarchical random-effects models. The added clinical utility of protein biomarkers was investigated using bootstrap bias-corrected decision curve analyses. FINDINGS: Aggregate data from 28 primary studies (6127 participants) were included, of which 8 studies (1790 participants) provided individual participant data. CA19-9 was significantly more accurate than MIC-1 for distinguishing pancreatic cancer from benign disease (AUC, 0.83 vs 0.74; relative diagnostic odds ratio [rDOR], 2.10 [95% CI, 0.98–4.48]; p = 0.002), THBS2 (AUC, 0.87 vs 0.69; rDOR, 4.53 [2.16–9.39]; p < 0.0001), TIMP-1 (AUC, 0.91 vs 0.70; rDOR, 8.00 [3.81–16.9]; p < 0.0001), OPN (AUC, 0.89 vs 0.74; rDOR, 4.22 [1.13–15.6]; p < 0.0001), ICAM-1 (AUC, 0.91 vs 0.68; rDOR 9.30 [0.87–99.5]; p < 0.0001), and IGFBP2 (AUC, 0.91 vs 0.68; rDOR, 4.48 [0.78–24.3]; p < 0.0001). The addition of these novel protein biomarkers to CA19-9 did not significantly improve the AUC, and resulted in minor increases or limited decreases in clinical utility. INTERPRETATION: Novel protein biomarkers have moderate diagnostic accuracy, do not outperform CA19-9 in differentiating pancreatic cancer from benign disease, and show limited added clinical value to CA19-9. We propose recommendations to aid the development of minimally invasive diagnostic tests with sufficient clinical utility to improve the management of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. FUNDING: Bennink Foundation, Dutch Cancer Foundation (KWF Kankerbestrijding), and AIRC.