Cargando…

Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block area comparison in the three different volumes of Ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: In abdominal surgery, ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum blocks (QLB) are performed to induce analgesia. However, no study reported suitable volumes of the anterior QLB for the different postoperative analgesia regions. Therefore, this prospective randomized controlled study a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Liang, Luo, Xu, Ye, Yingchao, Liu, Le, Cai, Yaoyao, Xia, Yun, Papadimos, Thomas J., Wang, Quanguang, Pan, Linmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01922-z
_version_ 1784840586087366656
author Shao, Liang
Luo, Xu
Ye, Yingchao
Liu, Le
Cai, Yaoyao
Xia, Yun
Papadimos, Thomas J.
Wang, Quanguang
Pan, Linmin
author_facet Shao, Liang
Luo, Xu
Ye, Yingchao
Liu, Le
Cai, Yaoyao
Xia, Yun
Papadimos, Thomas J.
Wang, Quanguang
Pan, Linmin
author_sort Shao, Liang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In abdominal surgery, ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum blocks (QLB) are performed to induce analgesia. However, no study reported suitable volumes of the anterior QLB for the different postoperative analgesia regions. Therefore, this prospective randomized controlled study assessed the dermatomal spread and analgesic effects of the three different volumes of a local anesthetic for anterior QLB. METHODS: Ultrasound-guided anterior QLB was performed at the L2 level on 30 healthy volunteers. The volunteers were randomized to receive 20 ml (n = 10), 30 ml (n = 10), and 40 mL (n = 10) of 0.375% ropivacaine. The cutaneous sensory blocked area (CSBA), the number of block dermatomes, and the block duration time were measured by determining the extent of the cold sensation. RESULTS: The CSBA was significantly larger in the 40 ml group than in the 30 (P = 0.001; 1350.6 ± 234.4 vs. 1009.5 ± 151.6 cm(2)) and 20 ml groups (P < 0.001; 1350.6 ± 234.4 vs. 808.1 ± 120.5 cm(2)). Similarly, the number of blocked dermatomes was significantly higher in the 40 ml group than in the 30- and 20-ml groups. However, no significant difference was observed in block duration among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in block duration with the various volumes of 0.375% ropivacaine. However, the larger volume for anterior QLB contributed to a larger area of cutaneous sensory blockade. Appropriate volumes in anterior QLB can create suitable postoperative analgesia levels for the different operative sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center on www.chictr.org.cn on 27th April 2018 (registration number: ChiCTR-IOR-17010853). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01922-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9706850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97068502022-11-30 Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block area comparison in the three different volumes of Ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy volunteers Shao, Liang Luo, Xu Ye, Yingchao Liu, Le Cai, Yaoyao Xia, Yun Papadimos, Thomas J. Wang, Quanguang Pan, Linmin BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: In abdominal surgery, ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum blocks (QLB) are performed to induce analgesia. However, no study reported suitable volumes of the anterior QLB for the different postoperative analgesia regions. Therefore, this prospective randomized controlled study assessed the dermatomal spread and analgesic effects of the three different volumes of a local anesthetic for anterior QLB. METHODS: Ultrasound-guided anterior QLB was performed at the L2 level on 30 healthy volunteers. The volunteers were randomized to receive 20 ml (n = 10), 30 ml (n = 10), and 40 mL (n = 10) of 0.375% ropivacaine. The cutaneous sensory blocked area (CSBA), the number of block dermatomes, and the block duration time were measured by determining the extent of the cold sensation. RESULTS: The CSBA was significantly larger in the 40 ml group than in the 30 (P = 0.001; 1350.6 ± 234.4 vs. 1009.5 ± 151.6 cm(2)) and 20 ml groups (P < 0.001; 1350.6 ± 234.4 vs. 808.1 ± 120.5 cm(2)). Similarly, the number of blocked dermatomes was significantly higher in the 40 ml group than in the 30- and 20-ml groups. However, no significant difference was observed in block duration among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in block duration with the various volumes of 0.375% ropivacaine. However, the larger volume for anterior QLB contributed to a larger area of cutaneous sensory blockade. Appropriate volumes in anterior QLB can create suitable postoperative analgesia levels for the different operative sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center on www.chictr.org.cn on 27th April 2018 (registration number: ChiCTR-IOR-17010853). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01922-z. BioMed Central 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9706850/ /pubmed/36447137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01922-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shao, Liang
Luo, Xu
Ye, Yingchao
Liu, Le
Cai, Yaoyao
Xia, Yun
Papadimos, Thomas J.
Wang, Quanguang
Pan, Linmin
Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block area comparison in the three different volumes of Ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy volunteers
title Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block area comparison in the three different volumes of Ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy volunteers
title_full Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block area comparison in the three different volumes of Ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block area comparison in the three different volumes of Ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block area comparison in the three different volumes of Ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy volunteers
title_short Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block area comparison in the three different volumes of Ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy volunteers
title_sort anterior quadratus lumborum block area comparison in the three different volumes of ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy volunteers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01922-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoliang anteriorquadratuslumborumblockareacomparisoninthethreedifferentvolumesofropivacaineadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinhealthyvolunteers
AT luoxu anteriorquadratuslumborumblockareacomparisoninthethreedifferentvolumesofropivacaineadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinhealthyvolunteers
AT yeyingchao anteriorquadratuslumborumblockareacomparisoninthethreedifferentvolumesofropivacaineadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinhealthyvolunteers
AT liule anteriorquadratuslumborumblockareacomparisoninthethreedifferentvolumesofropivacaineadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinhealthyvolunteers
AT caiyaoyao anteriorquadratuslumborumblockareacomparisoninthethreedifferentvolumesofropivacaineadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinhealthyvolunteers
AT xiayun anteriorquadratuslumborumblockareacomparisoninthethreedifferentvolumesofropivacaineadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinhealthyvolunteers
AT papadimosthomasj anteriorquadratuslumborumblockareacomparisoninthethreedifferentvolumesofropivacaineadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinhealthyvolunteers
AT wangquanguang anteriorquadratuslumborumblockareacomparisoninthethreedifferentvolumesofropivacaineadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinhealthyvolunteers
AT panlinmin anteriorquadratuslumborumblockareacomparisoninthethreedifferentvolumesofropivacaineadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinhealthyvolunteers