Cargando…

Duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of ICSI turn the tide?

BACKGROUND: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is increasingly used among in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles without male factor infertility. For couples with prolonged infertility duration, the preferred insemination method may vary across laboratories and clinics. We analyzed whether ICSI is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Liting, Cai, He, Li, Wei, Tian, Li, Shi, Juanzi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02062-9
_version_ 1784840586943004672
author Zhang, Liting
Cai, He
Li, Wei
Tian, Li
Shi, Juanzi
author_facet Zhang, Liting
Cai, He
Li, Wei
Tian, Li
Shi, Juanzi
author_sort Zhang, Liting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is increasingly used among in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles without male factor infertility. For couples with prolonged infertility duration, the preferred insemination method may vary across laboratories and clinics. We analyzed whether ICSI is effective for non-male factor infertility with long infertility duration. METHODS: Seventeen thousand four hundred seventy-seven IVF/ICSI cycles from women with non-male factor infertility were included, of these 4177 women with infertility duration ≥ 5 years were in the final analysis. Primary outcome was the live birth rate after first embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes were rates of clinical pregnancy and fertilization. RESULTS: A nonlinear relationship was observed between infertility duration and IVF fertilization rate, which decreased with infertility years up to the turning point (4.8 years). 4177 women with infertility ≥ 5 years were categorized by IVF (n = 3806) or ICSI (n = 371). Live birth rate after first embryo transfer was 43.02% in ICSI and 47.85% in IVF group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72–1.15). Fertilization rate per metaphaseII (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86–1.40) and clinical pregnancy rate (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71–1.13) were similar between the two groups. Sensitive analyses (women ≥ 35 years) did not show a benefit of ICSI over IVF. CONCLUSIONS: Women with infertility exceeding 4.8 years had decreased incidence of IVF fertilization. The use of ICSI showed no significant improvement in fertilization and live birth rates for non-male factor couples with ≥ 5 years of infertility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-02062-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9706853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97068532022-11-30 Duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of ICSI turn the tide? Zhang, Liting Cai, He Li, Wei Tian, Li Shi, Juanzi BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is increasingly used among in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles without male factor infertility. For couples with prolonged infertility duration, the preferred insemination method may vary across laboratories and clinics. We analyzed whether ICSI is effective for non-male factor infertility with long infertility duration. METHODS: Seventeen thousand four hundred seventy-seven IVF/ICSI cycles from women with non-male factor infertility were included, of these 4177 women with infertility duration ≥ 5 years were in the final analysis. Primary outcome was the live birth rate after first embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes were rates of clinical pregnancy and fertilization. RESULTS: A nonlinear relationship was observed between infertility duration and IVF fertilization rate, which decreased with infertility years up to the turning point (4.8 years). 4177 women with infertility ≥ 5 years were categorized by IVF (n = 3806) or ICSI (n = 371). Live birth rate after first embryo transfer was 43.02% in ICSI and 47.85% in IVF group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72–1.15). Fertilization rate per metaphaseII (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86–1.40) and clinical pregnancy rate (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71–1.13) were similar between the two groups. Sensitive analyses (women ≥ 35 years) did not show a benefit of ICSI over IVF. CONCLUSIONS: Women with infertility exceeding 4.8 years had decreased incidence of IVF fertilization. The use of ICSI showed no significant improvement in fertilization and live birth rates for non-male factor couples with ≥ 5 years of infertility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-02062-9. BioMed Central 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9706853/ /pubmed/36443809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02062-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Liting
Cai, He
Li, Wei
Tian, Li
Shi, Juanzi
Duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of ICSI turn the tide?
title Duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of ICSI turn the tide?
title_full Duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of ICSI turn the tide?
title_fullStr Duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of ICSI turn the tide?
title_full_unstemmed Duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of ICSI turn the tide?
title_short Duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of ICSI turn the tide?
title_sort duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of icsi turn the tide?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02062-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangliting durationofinfertilityandassistedreproductiveoutcomesinnonmalefactorinfertilitycanuseoficsiturnthetide
AT caihe durationofinfertilityandassistedreproductiveoutcomesinnonmalefactorinfertilitycanuseoficsiturnthetide
AT liwei durationofinfertilityandassistedreproductiveoutcomesinnonmalefactorinfertilitycanuseoficsiturnthetide
AT tianli durationofinfertilityandassistedreproductiveoutcomesinnonmalefactorinfertilitycanuseoficsiturnthetide
AT shijuanzi durationofinfertilityandassistedreproductiveoutcomesinnonmalefactorinfertilitycanuseoficsiturnthetide