Cargando…

Current utilization of interosseous access in pediatrics: a population-based analysis using an EHR database, TriNetX

BACKGROUND: When central or peripheral intravenous access cannot be achieved in a timely manner, intraosseous (IO) access is recommended as a safe and equally effective alternative for pediatric resuscitation. IO usage and its complications in the pediatric population have been primarily studied in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoskins, Meloria, Sefick, Samantha, Zurca, Adrian D., Walter, Vonn, Thomas, Neal J., Krawiec, Conrad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-022-00467-9
_version_ 1784840590920253440
author Hoskins, Meloria
Sefick, Samantha
Zurca, Adrian D.
Walter, Vonn
Thomas, Neal J.
Krawiec, Conrad
author_facet Hoskins, Meloria
Sefick, Samantha
Zurca, Adrian D.
Walter, Vonn
Thomas, Neal J.
Krawiec, Conrad
author_sort Hoskins, Meloria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When central or peripheral intravenous access cannot be achieved in a timely manner, intraosseous (IO) access is recommended as a safe and equally effective alternative for pediatric resuscitation. IO usage and its complications in the pediatric population have been primarily studied in the setting of cardiac arrest. However, population-based studies identifying noncardiac indications and complications associated with different age groups are sparse. RESULTS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study utilizing the TriNetX® electronic health record data. Thirty-seven hospitals were included in the data set with 1012 patients where an IO procedure code was reported in the emergency department or inpatient setting. The cohort was split into two groups, pediatric subjects < 1 year of age and those ≥ 1 year of age. A total incidence of IO line placement of 18 per 100,000 pediatric encounters was reported. Total mortality was 31.8%, with a higher rate of mortality seen in subjects < 1 year of age (39.2% vs 29.0%; p = 0.0028). A diagnosis of cardiac arrest was more frequent in subjects < 1 year of age (51.5% vs 38.0%; p = 0.002), and a diagnosis of convulsions was more frequent in those ≥ 1 of age (28.0% vs 13.8%; p <0.01). Overall, 29 (2.9%) subjects had at least one complication. CONCLUSIONS: More IOs were placed in subjects ≥ 1 year of age, and a higher rate of mortality was seen in subjects < 1 year of age. Lower frequencies of noncardiac diagnoses at the time of IO placement were found in both groups, highlighting IO may be underutilized in noncardiac settings such as convulsions, shock, and respiratory failure. Given the low rate of complications seen in both groups of our study, IO use should be considered early on for urgent vascular access, especially for children less than 1 year of age. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-022-00467-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9706868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97068682022-11-30 Current utilization of interosseous access in pediatrics: a population-based analysis using an EHR database, TriNetX Hoskins, Meloria Sefick, Samantha Zurca, Adrian D. Walter, Vonn Thomas, Neal J. Krawiec, Conrad Int J Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: When central or peripheral intravenous access cannot be achieved in a timely manner, intraosseous (IO) access is recommended as a safe and equally effective alternative for pediatric resuscitation. IO usage and its complications in the pediatric population have been primarily studied in the setting of cardiac arrest. However, population-based studies identifying noncardiac indications and complications associated with different age groups are sparse. RESULTS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study utilizing the TriNetX® electronic health record data. Thirty-seven hospitals were included in the data set with 1012 patients where an IO procedure code was reported in the emergency department or inpatient setting. The cohort was split into two groups, pediatric subjects < 1 year of age and those ≥ 1 year of age. A total incidence of IO line placement of 18 per 100,000 pediatric encounters was reported. Total mortality was 31.8%, with a higher rate of mortality seen in subjects < 1 year of age (39.2% vs 29.0%; p = 0.0028). A diagnosis of cardiac arrest was more frequent in subjects < 1 year of age (51.5% vs 38.0%; p = 0.002), and a diagnosis of convulsions was more frequent in those ≥ 1 of age (28.0% vs 13.8%; p <0.01). Overall, 29 (2.9%) subjects had at least one complication. CONCLUSIONS: More IOs were placed in subjects ≥ 1 year of age, and a higher rate of mortality was seen in subjects < 1 year of age. Lower frequencies of noncardiac diagnoses at the time of IO placement were found in both groups, highlighting IO may be underutilized in noncardiac settings such as convulsions, shock, and respiratory failure. Given the low rate of complications seen in both groups of our study, IO use should be considered early on for urgent vascular access, especially for children less than 1 year of age. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-022-00467-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9706868/ /pubmed/36447135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-022-00467-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hoskins, Meloria
Sefick, Samantha
Zurca, Adrian D.
Walter, Vonn
Thomas, Neal J.
Krawiec, Conrad
Current utilization of interosseous access in pediatrics: a population-based analysis using an EHR database, TriNetX
title Current utilization of interosseous access in pediatrics: a population-based analysis using an EHR database, TriNetX
title_full Current utilization of interosseous access in pediatrics: a population-based analysis using an EHR database, TriNetX
title_fullStr Current utilization of interosseous access in pediatrics: a population-based analysis using an EHR database, TriNetX
title_full_unstemmed Current utilization of interosseous access in pediatrics: a population-based analysis using an EHR database, TriNetX
title_short Current utilization of interosseous access in pediatrics: a population-based analysis using an EHR database, TriNetX
title_sort current utilization of interosseous access in pediatrics: a population-based analysis using an ehr database, trinetx
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-022-00467-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hoskinsmeloria currentutilizationofinterosseousaccessinpediatricsapopulationbasedanalysisusinganehrdatabasetrinetx
AT seficksamantha currentutilizationofinterosseousaccessinpediatricsapopulationbasedanalysisusinganehrdatabasetrinetx
AT zurcaadriand currentutilizationofinterosseousaccessinpediatricsapopulationbasedanalysisusinganehrdatabasetrinetx
AT waltervonn currentutilizationofinterosseousaccessinpediatricsapopulationbasedanalysisusinganehrdatabasetrinetx
AT thomasnealj currentutilizationofinterosseousaccessinpediatricsapopulationbasedanalysisusinganehrdatabasetrinetx
AT krawiecconrad currentutilizationofinterosseousaccessinpediatricsapopulationbasedanalysisusinganehrdatabasetrinetx