Cargando…

Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND: Comparison of 4 cannulated lag screws (3 inverted triangular cannulated screws + anti-rotating screws;4 CLS), dynamic hip screws + derotational screws (DHS + DS), and femoral neck fixation system (FNS) in the treatment of Biomechanical properties of middle-aged Pauwels type III femoral n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Ji, Zhao, Ziying, Zhi, Xiaodong, Wang, Hao, Wang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06003-3
_version_ 1784840610560081920
author Ma, Ji
Zhao, Ziying
Zhi, Xiaodong
Wang, Hao
Wang, Wei
author_facet Ma, Ji
Zhao, Ziying
Zhi, Xiaodong
Wang, Hao
Wang, Wei
author_sort Ma, Ji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comparison of 4 cannulated lag screws (3 inverted triangular cannulated screws + anti-rotating screws;4 CLS), dynamic hip screws + derotational screws (DHS + DS), and femoral neck fixation system (FNS) in the treatment of Biomechanical properties of middle-aged Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. METHODS: The femur CT data of a healthy young volunteer was selected and imported into Mimics software to construct a three-dimensional model of a normal femur. Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures were simulated according to the 70° fracture line. Use Geomagic and SolidWorks software to optimize and build CLS, DHS + DS, and FNS fracture internal fixation models. Finally, Ansys software was used to analyze the stress distribution, peak value, and maximum displacement of the proximal fracture fragment and internal fixation; the displacement distribution, and peak value of the fracture surface at the fracture end. RESULTS: ① The stress peaks of the proximal fracture fragments in the three groups were concentrated near the femoral calcar. The peak stress of the FNS group was the largest, and the DHS + DS group was the smallest. ②The displacement of the fracture fragments was all located at the top of the femur. The peak displacement of the FNS group was the largest, and the DHS + DS group was the smallest. ③ The internal fixation stress of the three groups is concentrated in the middle part of the device. The stress distribution of the first two groups of models is more uniform than that of FNS. The peak stress of FNS is the largest and the CLS is the smallest. ④ The internal fixed displacements are all located at the top of the model. The peak displacement of the CLS is the largest, and the DHS + DS is the smallest. ⑤ The displacement of the fracture surface is in the upper part of the fractured end. The peak displacement of the FNS group was the largest, and the DHS + DS group was the smallest. CONCLUSION: Compared with the other two internal fixation methods, dynamic hip screw + derotational screw (DHS + DS) showed good biomechanical stability. When Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture occurs in young adults, DHS + DS can be given priority as the preferred treatment for this type of fracture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9706946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97069462022-11-30 Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures Ma, Ji Zhao, Ziying Zhi, Xiaodong Wang, Hao Wang, Wei BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Comparison of 4 cannulated lag screws (3 inverted triangular cannulated screws + anti-rotating screws;4 CLS), dynamic hip screws + derotational screws (DHS + DS), and femoral neck fixation system (FNS) in the treatment of Biomechanical properties of middle-aged Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. METHODS: The femur CT data of a healthy young volunteer was selected and imported into Mimics software to construct a three-dimensional model of a normal femur. Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures were simulated according to the 70° fracture line. Use Geomagic and SolidWorks software to optimize and build CLS, DHS + DS, and FNS fracture internal fixation models. Finally, Ansys software was used to analyze the stress distribution, peak value, and maximum displacement of the proximal fracture fragment and internal fixation; the displacement distribution, and peak value of the fracture surface at the fracture end. RESULTS: ① The stress peaks of the proximal fracture fragments in the three groups were concentrated near the femoral calcar. The peak stress of the FNS group was the largest, and the DHS + DS group was the smallest. ②The displacement of the fracture fragments was all located at the top of the femur. The peak displacement of the FNS group was the largest, and the DHS + DS group was the smallest. ③ The internal fixation stress of the three groups is concentrated in the middle part of the device. The stress distribution of the first two groups of models is more uniform than that of FNS. The peak stress of FNS is the largest and the CLS is the smallest. ④ The internal fixed displacements are all located at the top of the model. The peak displacement of the CLS is the largest, and the DHS + DS is the smallest. ⑤ The displacement of the fracture surface is in the upper part of the fractured end. The peak displacement of the FNS group was the largest, and the DHS + DS group was the smallest. CONCLUSION: Compared with the other two internal fixation methods, dynamic hip screw + derotational screw (DHS + DS) showed good biomechanical stability. When Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture occurs in young adults, DHS + DS can be given priority as the preferred treatment for this type of fracture. BioMed Central 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9706946/ /pubmed/36447275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06003-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ma, Ji
Zhao, Ziying
Zhi, Xiaodong
Wang, Hao
Wang, Wei
Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures
title Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures
title_full Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures
title_fullStr Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures
title_full_unstemmed Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures
title_short Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures
title_sort finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of pauwels type iii femoral neck fractures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06003-3
work_keys_str_mv AT maji finiteelementcomparativeanalysisofthreedifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofpauwelstypeiiifemoralneckfractures
AT zhaoziying finiteelementcomparativeanalysisofthreedifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofpauwelstypeiiifemoralneckfractures
AT zhixiaodong finiteelementcomparativeanalysisofthreedifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofpauwelstypeiiifemoralneckfractures
AT wanghao finiteelementcomparativeanalysisofthreedifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofpauwelstypeiiifemoralneckfractures
AT wangwei finiteelementcomparativeanalysisofthreedifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofpauwelstypeiiifemoralneckfractures