Cargando…
The worst mistake 2.0? The digital revolution and the consequences of innovation
The invention of agriculture 12,000 years ago has been called the worst mistake in human history. Alongside the social, political, and technological innovations that stemmed from it, there came a litany of drawbacks ranging from social inequality, a decline in human health, to the concentration of p...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01599-5 |
_version_ | 1784840656958521344 |
---|---|
author | O’Lemmon, Matthew |
author_facet | O’Lemmon, Matthew |
author_sort | O’Lemmon, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The invention of agriculture 12,000 years ago has been called the worst mistake in human history. Alongside the social, political, and technological innovations that stemmed from it, there came a litany of drawbacks ranging from social inequality, a decline in human health, to the concentration of power in the hands of a few. Millennia after the invention of agriculture, another revolution—the digital revolution—is having a similar impact on humanity, albeit at a scale and speed measured in decades. Despite the tremendous advances brought about by this revolution, there is today a rapidly expanding gulf within and between societies along technological lines; alarming effects on sociality and cognition due to a persistent online presence; and a concentration of power in the form of wealth and data within a handful of tech companies, the likes of which has never been seen before. While the effects of agriculture can now be discerned with thousands of years of hindsight, those of the digital revolution can be witnessed in real time. Is the digital revolution paving the way for a more equitable and stable world, or is it leading humanity down a road that will prove to be more detrimental the more ensconced in technology we become? |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9707148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97071482022-11-29 The worst mistake 2.0? The digital revolution and the consequences of innovation O’Lemmon, Matthew AI Soc Open Forum The invention of agriculture 12,000 years ago has been called the worst mistake in human history. Alongside the social, political, and technological innovations that stemmed from it, there came a litany of drawbacks ranging from social inequality, a decline in human health, to the concentration of power in the hands of a few. Millennia after the invention of agriculture, another revolution—the digital revolution—is having a similar impact on humanity, albeit at a scale and speed measured in decades. Despite the tremendous advances brought about by this revolution, there is today a rapidly expanding gulf within and between societies along technological lines; alarming effects on sociality and cognition due to a persistent online presence; and a concentration of power in the form of wealth and data within a handful of tech companies, the likes of which has never been seen before. While the effects of agriculture can now be discerned with thousands of years of hindsight, those of the digital revolution can be witnessed in real time. Is the digital revolution paving the way for a more equitable and stable world, or is it leading humanity down a road that will prove to be more detrimental the more ensconced in technology we become? Springer London 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9707148/ /pubmed/36465190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01599-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Open Forum O’Lemmon, Matthew The worst mistake 2.0? The digital revolution and the consequences of innovation |
title | The worst mistake 2.0? The digital revolution and the consequences of innovation |
title_full | The worst mistake 2.0? The digital revolution and the consequences of innovation |
title_fullStr | The worst mistake 2.0? The digital revolution and the consequences of innovation |
title_full_unstemmed | The worst mistake 2.0? The digital revolution and the consequences of innovation |
title_short | The worst mistake 2.0? The digital revolution and the consequences of innovation |
title_sort | worst mistake 2.0? the digital revolution and the consequences of innovation |
topic | Open Forum |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01599-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olemmonmatthew theworstmistake20thedigitalrevolutionandtheconsequencesofinnovation AT olemmonmatthew worstmistake20thedigitalrevolutionandtheconsequencesofinnovation |