Cargando…

General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample

BACKGROUND: The study of sex and gender patterns in psychosocial resources is a growing field of interest in pain research with importance for pain rehabilitation and prevention. The aims of this study were first, to estimate cross-sectional differences in psychosocial resources (general self-effica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samulowitz, Anke, Hensing, Gunnel, Haukenes, Inger, Bergman, Stefan, Grimby-Ekman, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05992-5
_version_ 1784840679561625600
author Samulowitz, Anke
Hensing, Gunnel
Haukenes, Inger
Bergman, Stefan
Grimby-Ekman, Anna
author_facet Samulowitz, Anke
Hensing, Gunnel
Haukenes, Inger
Bergman, Stefan
Grimby-Ekman, Anna
author_sort Samulowitz, Anke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study of sex and gender patterns in psychosocial resources is a growing field of interest in pain research with importance for pain rehabilitation and prevention. The aims of this study were first, to estimate cross-sectional differences in psychosocial resources (general self-efficacy and social support) across men and women in a population with frequent musculoskeletal pain (pain in the back or neck/shoulder nearly every day or now and again during the week for the last 12 months) and to compare these differences with a population with no frequent pain. Second, to examine if psychosocial resources at baseline were associated with pain at follow-up among men and women in the frequent pain population. METHODS: This study was based on survey data from the Swedish Health Assets Project, including The General Self-Efficacy Scale and social support questions. Participants (n = 4010, 55% women) were divided into no frequent pain (n = 2855) and frequent pain (n = 1155). General self-efficacy and social support were analyzed (cross-sectional and longitudinal data) with linear and logistic regressions. RESULTS: Men, with and without frequent pain, had higher general self-efficacy than the corresponding groups in women. Women, with and without frequent pain, had stronger emotional social support than the corresponding groups in men. Men with no frequent pain had weaker instrumental social support than women with no frequent pain (OR = 0.64 (95% CI 0.47–0.87)), men with frequent pain did not (OR = 1.32 (95% CI 0.86–2.01)). In the frequent pain population, the interaction between sex and strong (compared to weak) emotional social support was statistically significant (p = 0.040) for no frequent pain at follow-up, with women having OR = 1.81 and men OR = 0.62. Among women, strong emotional social support was associated with no frequent pain at follow-up. Among men, strong emotional social support was associated with frequent pain at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Some of the associations between general self-efficacy, social support and musculosceletal pain showed unexpected sex patterns. Gendered expectations might have relevance for some of the results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05992-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9707264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97072642022-11-30 General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample Samulowitz, Anke Hensing, Gunnel Haukenes, Inger Bergman, Stefan Grimby-Ekman, Anna BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The study of sex and gender patterns in psychosocial resources is a growing field of interest in pain research with importance for pain rehabilitation and prevention. The aims of this study were first, to estimate cross-sectional differences in psychosocial resources (general self-efficacy and social support) across men and women in a population with frequent musculoskeletal pain (pain in the back or neck/shoulder nearly every day or now and again during the week for the last 12 months) and to compare these differences with a population with no frequent pain. Second, to examine if psychosocial resources at baseline were associated with pain at follow-up among men and women in the frequent pain population. METHODS: This study was based on survey data from the Swedish Health Assets Project, including The General Self-Efficacy Scale and social support questions. Participants (n = 4010, 55% women) were divided into no frequent pain (n = 2855) and frequent pain (n = 1155). General self-efficacy and social support were analyzed (cross-sectional and longitudinal data) with linear and logistic regressions. RESULTS: Men, with and without frequent pain, had higher general self-efficacy than the corresponding groups in women. Women, with and without frequent pain, had stronger emotional social support than the corresponding groups in men. Men with no frequent pain had weaker instrumental social support than women with no frequent pain (OR = 0.64 (95% CI 0.47–0.87)), men with frequent pain did not (OR = 1.32 (95% CI 0.86–2.01)). In the frequent pain population, the interaction between sex and strong (compared to weak) emotional social support was statistically significant (p = 0.040) for no frequent pain at follow-up, with women having OR = 1.81 and men OR = 0.62. Among women, strong emotional social support was associated with no frequent pain at follow-up. Among men, strong emotional social support was associated with frequent pain at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Some of the associations between general self-efficacy, social support and musculosceletal pain showed unexpected sex patterns. Gendered expectations might have relevance for some of the results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05992-5. BioMed Central 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9707264/ /pubmed/36447177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05992-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Samulowitz, Anke
Hensing, Gunnel
Haukenes, Inger
Bergman, Stefan
Grimby-Ekman, Anna
General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample
title General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample
title_full General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample
title_fullStr General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample
title_full_unstemmed General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample
title_short General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample
title_sort general self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05992-5
work_keys_str_mv AT samulowitzanke generalselfefficacyandsocialsupportinmenandwomenwithpainirregularsexpatternsofcrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinageneralpopulationsample
AT hensinggunnel generalselfefficacyandsocialsupportinmenandwomenwithpainirregularsexpatternsofcrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinageneralpopulationsample
AT haukenesinger generalselfefficacyandsocialsupportinmenandwomenwithpainirregularsexpatternsofcrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinageneralpopulationsample
AT bergmanstefan generalselfefficacyandsocialsupportinmenandwomenwithpainirregularsexpatternsofcrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinageneralpopulationsample
AT grimbyekmananna generalselfefficacyandsocialsupportinmenandwomenwithpainirregularsexpatternsofcrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinageneralpopulationsample