Cargando…

Impact of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from NARA 2000–2017

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We have previously observed differences in treatment and outcome of knee arthroplasties in the Nordic countries. To evaluate the impact of Nordic collaboration in the last 15 years we aimed to compare patient demographics, methods, and revision rates in primary knee arthropla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: IRMOLA, Tero, PONKILAINEN, Ville, MÄKELÄ, Keijo T, ROBERTSSON, Otto, W-DAHL, Annette, FURNES, Ove, FENSTAD, Anne M, PEDERSEN, Alma B, SCHRØDER, Henrik M, NIEMELÄINEN, Mika J, ESKELINEN, Antti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445098
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.5256
_version_ 1784840704925630464
author IRMOLA, Tero
PONKILAINEN, Ville
MÄKELÄ, Keijo T
ROBERTSSON, Otto
W-DAHL, Annette
FURNES, Ove
FENSTAD, Anne M
PEDERSEN, Alma B
SCHRØDER, Henrik M
NIEMELÄINEN, Mika J
ESKELINEN, Antti
author_facet IRMOLA, Tero
PONKILAINEN, Ville
MÄKELÄ, Keijo T
ROBERTSSON, Otto
W-DAHL, Annette
FURNES, Ove
FENSTAD, Anne M
PEDERSEN, Alma B
SCHRØDER, Henrik M
NIEMELÄINEN, Mika J
ESKELINEN, Antti
author_sort IRMOLA, Tero
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We have previously observed differences in treatment and outcome of knee arthroplasties in the Nordic countries. To evaluate the impact of Nordic collaboration in the last 15 years we aimed to compare patient demographics, methods, and revision rates in primary knee arthroplasties among the 4 Nordic countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 535,051 primary knee arthroplasties reported 2000–2017 from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database. Kaplan–Meier analysis (KM) and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis were used to evaluate the cumulative revision rate (CRR) and RMST estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and to compare countries in relation to risk of revision for any reason. RESULTS: After 2010, the increase in incidence of knee arthroplasty plateaued in Sweden and Denmark but continued to increase in Finland and Norway. In 2017 the incidence was highest in Finland with 226 per 10(5) person-years, while it was less than 150 per 10(5) in the 3 other Nordic countries. In total knee arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis (OA), overall CRR at 15 years for revision due to any reason was higher in Denmark (CRR 9.6%, 95% CI 9.2−10), Norway (CRR 9.1%, CI 8.7−9.5), and Finland (CRR 7.0%, CI 6.8−7.3) compared with Sweden (CRR 6.6%, CI 6.4−6.8). There were differences among the countries in use of implant brand and type, fixation, patellar component, and use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. INTERPRETATION: We evinced a slowing growth of incidence of knee arthroplasties in the Nordic countries after 2010 with Finland having the highest incidence. We also noted substantial differences among the 4 Nordic countries, with Sweden having a lower risk of revision than the other countries. No impact of NARA could be demonstrated and CRR did not improve over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9707384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97073842022-11-30 Impact of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from NARA 2000–2017 IRMOLA, Tero PONKILAINEN, Ville MÄKELÄ, Keijo T ROBERTSSON, Otto W-DAHL, Annette FURNES, Ove FENSTAD, Anne M PEDERSEN, Alma B SCHRØDER, Henrik M NIEMELÄINEN, Mika J ESKELINEN, Antti Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We have previously observed differences in treatment and outcome of knee arthroplasties in the Nordic countries. To evaluate the impact of Nordic collaboration in the last 15 years we aimed to compare patient demographics, methods, and revision rates in primary knee arthroplasties among the 4 Nordic countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 535,051 primary knee arthroplasties reported 2000–2017 from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database. Kaplan–Meier analysis (KM) and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis were used to evaluate the cumulative revision rate (CRR) and RMST estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and to compare countries in relation to risk of revision for any reason. RESULTS: After 2010, the increase in incidence of knee arthroplasty plateaued in Sweden and Denmark but continued to increase in Finland and Norway. In 2017 the incidence was highest in Finland with 226 per 10(5) person-years, while it was less than 150 per 10(5) in the 3 other Nordic countries. In total knee arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis (OA), overall CRR at 15 years for revision due to any reason was higher in Denmark (CRR 9.6%, 95% CI 9.2−10), Norway (CRR 9.1%, CI 8.7−9.5), and Finland (CRR 7.0%, CI 6.8−7.3) compared with Sweden (CRR 6.6%, CI 6.4−6.8). There were differences among the countries in use of implant brand and type, fixation, patellar component, and use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. INTERPRETATION: We evinced a slowing growth of incidence of knee arthroplasties in the Nordic countries after 2010 with Finland having the highest incidence. We also noted substantial differences among the 4 Nordic countries, with Sweden having a lower risk of revision than the other countries. No impact of NARA could be demonstrated and CRR did not improve over time. Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9707384/ /pubmed/36445098 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.5256 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
spellingShingle Article
IRMOLA, Tero
PONKILAINEN, Ville
MÄKELÄ, Keijo T
ROBERTSSON, Otto
W-DAHL, Annette
FURNES, Ove
FENSTAD, Anne M
PEDERSEN, Alma B
SCHRØDER, Henrik M
NIEMELÄINEN, Mika J
ESKELINEN, Antti
Impact of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from NARA 2000–2017
title Impact of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from NARA 2000–2017
title_full Impact of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from NARA 2000–2017
title_fullStr Impact of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from NARA 2000–2017
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from NARA 2000–2017
title_short Impact of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from NARA 2000–2017
title_sort impact of the nordic arthroplasty register association (nara) collaboration on demographics, methods and revision rates in knee arthroplasty: a register-based study from nara 2000–2017
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445098
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.5256
work_keys_str_mv AT irmolatero impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT ponkilainenville impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT makelakeijot impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT robertssonotto impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT wdahlannette impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT furnesove impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT fenstadannem impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT pedersenalmab impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT schrøderhenrikm impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT niemelainenmikaj impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017
AT eskelinenantti impactofthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaracollaborationondemographicsmethodsandrevisionratesinkneearthroplastyaregisterbasedstudyfromnara20002017