Cargando…

Description of the technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers: 2D vs. 3D camera

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. ANIMALS: 8 canine cadavers. METHODS: Specimens were randomly divided into a 2D or 3D group. The vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) was performed with 5 mm laparoscopic needle h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monnet, Eric, Hafez, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274868
_version_ 1784840770895740928
author Monnet, Eric
Hafez, Ahmed
author_facet Monnet, Eric
Hafez, Ahmed
author_sort Monnet, Eric
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. ANIMALS: 8 canine cadavers. METHODS: Specimens were randomly divided into a 2D or 3D group. The vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) was performed with 5 mm laparoscopic needle holders. A unidirectional barbed suture was used to complete the VUA with two simple continuous suture patterns. The number of stitches placed, the patency of the anastomosis, and the distance between the VUA and the ureters were recorded. RESULTS: Four dogs were entered into each group. The prostatectomy was completed in each dog following the same technique. VUA were completed with nine stitches (range: 8–10 stitches) for the 2D group and ten stitches (range: 9–11 stitches) for the 3D group (p<0.176). All the stitches were placed full thickness. The VUA was patent in each case. The left ureter was 1.05 cm (range: 0.5 to 1.1cm) from the VUA in the 2D group and 1.8 cm (range: 1.3–1.8 cm) for the 3D group (p< 0.025). The right ureter was 1.5 cm (range: 1 to 2 cm) from the VUA in the 2D group and 1.75 cm (range: 1.3–2 cm) for the 3D group (p< 0.55). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can be performed with a 2D or a 3D camera in canine cadavers. The 3D camera results in more accurate placement of the sutures since they were placed further away from the left ureter. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Radical prostatectomy with laparoscopy should be considered for dogs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9707773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97077732022-11-30 Description of the technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers: 2D vs. 3D camera Monnet, Eric Hafez, Ahmed PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. ANIMALS: 8 canine cadavers. METHODS: Specimens were randomly divided into a 2D or 3D group. The vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) was performed with 5 mm laparoscopic needle holders. A unidirectional barbed suture was used to complete the VUA with two simple continuous suture patterns. The number of stitches placed, the patency of the anastomosis, and the distance between the VUA and the ureters were recorded. RESULTS: Four dogs were entered into each group. The prostatectomy was completed in each dog following the same technique. VUA were completed with nine stitches (range: 8–10 stitches) for the 2D group and ten stitches (range: 9–11 stitches) for the 3D group (p<0.176). All the stitches were placed full thickness. The VUA was patent in each case. The left ureter was 1.05 cm (range: 0.5 to 1.1cm) from the VUA in the 2D group and 1.8 cm (range: 1.3–1.8 cm) for the 3D group (p< 0.025). The right ureter was 1.5 cm (range: 1 to 2 cm) from the VUA in the 2D group and 1.75 cm (range: 1.3–2 cm) for the 3D group (p< 0.55). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can be performed with a 2D or a 3D camera in canine cadavers. The 3D camera results in more accurate placement of the sutures since they were placed further away from the left ureter. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Radical prostatectomy with laparoscopy should be considered for dogs. Public Library of Science 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9707773/ /pubmed/36445893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274868 Text en © 2022 Monnet, Hafez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Monnet, Eric
Hafez, Ahmed
Description of the technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers: 2D vs. 3D camera
title Description of the technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers: 2D vs. 3D camera
title_full Description of the technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers: 2D vs. 3D camera
title_fullStr Description of the technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers: 2D vs. 3D camera
title_full_unstemmed Description of the technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers: 2D vs. 3D camera
title_short Description of the technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers: 2D vs. 3D camera
title_sort description of the technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in canine cadavers: 2d vs. 3d camera
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274868
work_keys_str_mv AT monneteric descriptionofthetechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyincaninecadavers2dvs3dcamera
AT hafezahmed descriptionofthetechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyincaninecadavers2dvs3dcamera