Cargando…

Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty in the treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scienc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panda, Smriti, Sakthivel, Pirabu, Gurusamy, Kurinchi S., Sharma, Atul, Thakar, Alok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277460
_version_ 1784840774054051840
author Panda, Smriti
Sakthivel, Pirabu
Gurusamy, Kurinchi S.
Sharma, Atul
Thakar, Alok
author_facet Panda, Smriti
Sakthivel, Pirabu
Gurusamy, Kurinchi S.
Sharma, Atul
Thakar, Alok
author_sort Panda, Smriti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty in the treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and Conference Proceedings databases and trial registries were searched until November 2020 for randomized controlled trials performed on resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Two systematic review authors independently identified studies and extracted data. The primary outcomes evaluated were overall survival, disease-free survival, any recurrence, local recurrence, loco-regional recurrence, distal recurrence and laryngectomy-free survival. The secondary outcomes were response rates following neoadjuvant treatment and comparison of treatment-related toxicity. Assessment of risk of bias was performed for the selected studies using Cochrane’s tool for assessing risk of bias. The studies were evaluated for the quality of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations). Risk ratios (RR), rate ratios, and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Five RCTs met the inclusion criteria for this review. The risk of bias was unclear or high for the trials. Non-organ preservation(n = 140) versus organ preservation (n = 144) (two trials): no statistically significant difference could be identified for any of the primary outcomes. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n = 37) versus sequential chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (n = 34) (one trial): no statistically significant difference was noted between the two treatment arms for overall survival, disease-free survival and loco-regional recurrence. Laryngectomy-free survival was found to be superior in concurrent chemoradiotherapy arm (HR:0.28, 95% CI 0.13, 0.57). Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n = 53) versus induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (n = 60) (one trial): no statistically significant difference was noted between the treatment arms for overall survival, disease-free survival and laryngectomy-free survival. Preoperative radiotherapy (n = 24) versus postoperative radiotherapy (n = 23) (one trial): overall survival was found to be better in the postoperative radiotherapy arm (HR:2.44, 95% CI1.18, 5.03). No statistically significant difference was noted in terms of treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: There are considerable uncertainties in the management of resectable hypopharyngeal cancer. TRAIL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD42019155613.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9707785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97077852022-11-30 Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Panda, Smriti Sakthivel, Pirabu Gurusamy, Kurinchi S. Sharma, Atul Thakar, Alok PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty in the treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and Conference Proceedings databases and trial registries were searched until November 2020 for randomized controlled trials performed on resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Two systematic review authors independently identified studies and extracted data. The primary outcomes evaluated were overall survival, disease-free survival, any recurrence, local recurrence, loco-regional recurrence, distal recurrence and laryngectomy-free survival. The secondary outcomes were response rates following neoadjuvant treatment and comparison of treatment-related toxicity. Assessment of risk of bias was performed for the selected studies using Cochrane’s tool for assessing risk of bias. The studies were evaluated for the quality of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations). Risk ratios (RR), rate ratios, and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Five RCTs met the inclusion criteria for this review. The risk of bias was unclear or high for the trials. Non-organ preservation(n = 140) versus organ preservation (n = 144) (two trials): no statistically significant difference could be identified for any of the primary outcomes. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n = 37) versus sequential chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (n = 34) (one trial): no statistically significant difference was noted between the two treatment arms for overall survival, disease-free survival and loco-regional recurrence. Laryngectomy-free survival was found to be superior in concurrent chemoradiotherapy arm (HR:0.28, 95% CI 0.13, 0.57). Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n = 53) versus induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (n = 60) (one trial): no statistically significant difference was noted between the treatment arms for overall survival, disease-free survival and laryngectomy-free survival. Preoperative radiotherapy (n = 24) versus postoperative radiotherapy (n = 23) (one trial): overall survival was found to be better in the postoperative radiotherapy arm (HR:2.44, 95% CI1.18, 5.03). No statistically significant difference was noted in terms of treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: There are considerable uncertainties in the management of resectable hypopharyngeal cancer. TRAIL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD42019155613. Public Library of Science 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9707785/ /pubmed/36445884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277460 Text en © 2022 Panda et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Panda, Smriti
Sakthivel, Pirabu
Gurusamy, Kurinchi S.
Sharma, Atul
Thakar, Alok
Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277460
work_keys_str_mv AT pandasmriti treatmentoptionsforresectablehypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sakthivelpirabu treatmentoptionsforresectablehypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT gurusamykurinchis treatmentoptionsforresectablehypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sharmaatul treatmentoptionsforresectablehypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT thakaralok treatmentoptionsforresectablehypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials