Cargando…
Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app
AIMS: The traditional approach to documenting angina outcomes in clinical trials is to ask the patient to recall their symptoms at the end of a month. With the ubiquitous availability of smartphones and tablets, daily contemporaneous documentation might be possible. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ORBITA-2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac015 |
_version_ | 1784840797654351872 |
---|---|
author | Nowbar, Alexandra N Howard, James P Shun-Shin, Matthew J Rajkumar, Christopher Foley, Michael Basu, Arunima Goel, Akshit Patel, Sapna Adnan, Ahmer Beattie, Catherine J Keeble, Thomas R Sohaib, Afzal Collier, David McVeigh, Patrick Harrell, Frank E Francis, Darrel P Al-Lamee, Rasha K |
author_facet | Nowbar, Alexandra N Howard, James P Shun-Shin, Matthew J Rajkumar, Christopher Foley, Michael Basu, Arunima Goel, Akshit Patel, Sapna Adnan, Ahmer Beattie, Catherine J Keeble, Thomas R Sohaib, Afzal Collier, David McVeigh, Patrick Harrell, Frank E Francis, Darrel P Al-Lamee, Rasha K |
author_sort | Nowbar, Alexandra N |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The traditional approach to documenting angina outcomes in clinical trials is to ask the patient to recall their symptoms at the end of a month. With the ubiquitous availability of smartphones and tablets, daily contemporaneous documentation might be possible. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ORBITA-2 symptom smartphone app was developed with a user-centred iterative design and testing cycle involving a focus group of previous ORBITA participants. The feasibility and acceptability were assessed in an internal pilot of participants in the ongoing ORBITA-2 trial. Seven days of app entries by ORBITA-2 participants were compared with subsequent participant recall at the end of the 7-day period. The design focus group tested a prototype app. They reported that the final version captured their symptoms and was easy to use. In the completion assessment group, 141 of 142 (99%) completed the app in full and 47 of 141 (33%) without reminders. In the recall assessment group, 29 of 29 (100%) participants said they could recall the previous day’s symptoms, and 82% of them recalled correctly. For 2 days previously, 88% said they could recall and of those, 87% recalled correctly. The proportion saying they could recall their symptoms fell progressively thereafter: 89, 67, 61, 50%, and at 7 days, 55% (P < 0.001 for trend). The proportion of recalling correctly also fell progressively to 55% at 7 days (P = 0.04 for trend). CONCLUSION: Episode counts of angina are difficult to recall after a few days. For trials such as ORBITA-2 focusing on angina, daily symptom collection via a smartphone app will increase the validity of the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9707878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97078782023-01-27 Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app Nowbar, Alexandra N Howard, James P Shun-Shin, Matthew J Rajkumar, Christopher Foley, Michael Basu, Arunima Goel, Akshit Patel, Sapna Adnan, Ahmer Beattie, Catherine J Keeble, Thomas R Sohaib, Afzal Collier, David McVeigh, Patrick Harrell, Frank E Francis, Darrel P Al-Lamee, Rasha K Eur Heart J Digit Health Original Article AIMS: The traditional approach to documenting angina outcomes in clinical trials is to ask the patient to recall their symptoms at the end of a month. With the ubiquitous availability of smartphones and tablets, daily contemporaneous documentation might be possible. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ORBITA-2 symptom smartphone app was developed with a user-centred iterative design and testing cycle involving a focus group of previous ORBITA participants. The feasibility and acceptability were assessed in an internal pilot of participants in the ongoing ORBITA-2 trial. Seven days of app entries by ORBITA-2 participants were compared with subsequent participant recall at the end of the 7-day period. The design focus group tested a prototype app. They reported that the final version captured their symptoms and was easy to use. In the completion assessment group, 141 of 142 (99%) completed the app in full and 47 of 141 (33%) without reminders. In the recall assessment group, 29 of 29 (100%) participants said they could recall the previous day’s symptoms, and 82% of them recalled correctly. For 2 days previously, 88% said they could recall and of those, 87% recalled correctly. The proportion saying they could recall their symptoms fell progressively thereafter: 89, 67, 61, 50%, and at 7 days, 55% (P < 0.001 for trend). The proportion of recalling correctly also fell progressively to 55% at 7 days (P = 0.04 for trend). CONCLUSION: Episode counts of angina are difficult to recall after a few days. For trials such as ORBITA-2 focusing on angina, daily symptom collection via a smartphone app will increase the validity of the results. Oxford University Press 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9707878/ /pubmed/36713021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac015 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nowbar, Alexandra N Howard, James P Shun-Shin, Matthew J Rajkumar, Christopher Foley, Michael Basu, Arunima Goel, Akshit Patel, Sapna Adnan, Ahmer Beattie, Catherine J Keeble, Thomas R Sohaib, Afzal Collier, David McVeigh, Patrick Harrell, Frank E Francis, Darrel P Al-Lamee, Rasha K Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app |
title | Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app |
title_full | Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app |
title_fullStr | Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app |
title_full_unstemmed | Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app |
title_short | Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app |
title_sort | daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nowbaralexandran dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT howardjamesp dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT shunshinmatthewj dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT rajkumarchristopher dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT foleymichael dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT basuarunima dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT goelakshit dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT patelsapna dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT adnanahmer dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT beattiecatherinej dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT keeblethomasr dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT sohaibafzal dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT collierdavid dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT mcveighpatrick dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT harrellfranke dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT francisdarrelp dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp AT allameerashak dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp |