Cargando…

Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app

AIMS: The traditional approach to documenting angina outcomes in clinical trials is to ask the patient to recall their symptoms at the end of a month. With the ubiquitous availability of smartphones and tablets, daily contemporaneous documentation might be possible. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ORBITA-2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nowbar, Alexandra N, Howard, James P, Shun-Shin, Matthew J, Rajkumar, Christopher, Foley, Michael, Basu, Arunima, Goel, Akshit, Patel, Sapna, Adnan, Ahmer, Beattie, Catherine J, Keeble, Thomas R, Sohaib, Afzal, Collier, David, McVeigh, Patrick, Harrell, Frank E, Francis, Darrel P, Al-Lamee, Rasha K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac015
_version_ 1784840797654351872
author Nowbar, Alexandra N
Howard, James P
Shun-Shin, Matthew J
Rajkumar, Christopher
Foley, Michael
Basu, Arunima
Goel, Akshit
Patel, Sapna
Adnan, Ahmer
Beattie, Catherine J
Keeble, Thomas R
Sohaib, Afzal
Collier, David
McVeigh, Patrick
Harrell, Frank E
Francis, Darrel P
Al-Lamee, Rasha K
author_facet Nowbar, Alexandra N
Howard, James P
Shun-Shin, Matthew J
Rajkumar, Christopher
Foley, Michael
Basu, Arunima
Goel, Akshit
Patel, Sapna
Adnan, Ahmer
Beattie, Catherine J
Keeble, Thomas R
Sohaib, Afzal
Collier, David
McVeigh, Patrick
Harrell, Frank E
Francis, Darrel P
Al-Lamee, Rasha K
author_sort Nowbar, Alexandra N
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The traditional approach to documenting angina outcomes in clinical trials is to ask the patient to recall their symptoms at the end of a month. With the ubiquitous availability of smartphones and tablets, daily contemporaneous documentation might be possible. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ORBITA-2 symptom smartphone app was developed with a user-centred iterative design and testing cycle involving a focus group of previous ORBITA participants. The feasibility and acceptability were assessed in an internal pilot of participants in the ongoing ORBITA-2 trial. Seven days of app entries by ORBITA-2 participants were compared with subsequent participant recall at the end of the 7-day period. The design focus group tested a prototype app. They reported that the final version captured their symptoms and was easy to use. In the completion assessment group, 141 of 142 (99%) completed the app in full and 47 of 141 (33%) without reminders. In the recall assessment group, 29 of 29 (100%) participants said they could recall the previous day’s symptoms, and 82% of them recalled correctly. For 2 days previously, 88% said they could recall and of those, 87% recalled correctly. The proportion saying they could recall their symptoms fell progressively thereafter: 89, 67, 61, 50%, and at 7 days, 55% (P < 0.001 for trend). The proportion of recalling correctly also fell progressively to 55% at 7 days (P = 0.04 for trend). CONCLUSION: Episode counts of angina are difficult to recall after a few days. For trials such as ORBITA-2 focusing on angina, daily symptom collection via a smartphone app will increase the validity of the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9707878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97078782023-01-27 Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app Nowbar, Alexandra N Howard, James P Shun-Shin, Matthew J Rajkumar, Christopher Foley, Michael Basu, Arunima Goel, Akshit Patel, Sapna Adnan, Ahmer Beattie, Catherine J Keeble, Thomas R Sohaib, Afzal Collier, David McVeigh, Patrick Harrell, Frank E Francis, Darrel P Al-Lamee, Rasha K Eur Heart J Digit Health Original Article AIMS: The traditional approach to documenting angina outcomes in clinical trials is to ask the patient to recall their symptoms at the end of a month. With the ubiquitous availability of smartphones and tablets, daily contemporaneous documentation might be possible. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ORBITA-2 symptom smartphone app was developed with a user-centred iterative design and testing cycle involving a focus group of previous ORBITA participants. The feasibility and acceptability were assessed in an internal pilot of participants in the ongoing ORBITA-2 trial. Seven days of app entries by ORBITA-2 participants were compared with subsequent participant recall at the end of the 7-day period. The design focus group tested a prototype app. They reported that the final version captured their symptoms and was easy to use. In the completion assessment group, 141 of 142 (99%) completed the app in full and 47 of 141 (33%) without reminders. In the recall assessment group, 29 of 29 (100%) participants said they could recall the previous day’s symptoms, and 82% of them recalled correctly. For 2 days previously, 88% said they could recall and of those, 87% recalled correctly. The proportion saying they could recall their symptoms fell progressively thereafter: 89, 67, 61, 50%, and at 7 days, 55% (P < 0.001 for trend). The proportion of recalling correctly also fell progressively to 55% at 7 days (P = 0.04 for trend). CONCLUSION: Episode counts of angina are difficult to recall after a few days. For trials such as ORBITA-2 focusing on angina, daily symptom collection via a smartphone app will increase the validity of the results. Oxford University Press 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9707878/ /pubmed/36713021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac015 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Nowbar, Alexandra N
Howard, James P
Shun-Shin, Matthew J
Rajkumar, Christopher
Foley, Michael
Basu, Arunima
Goel, Akshit
Patel, Sapna
Adnan, Ahmer
Beattie, Catherine J
Keeble, Thomas R
Sohaib, Afzal
Collier, David
McVeigh, Patrick
Harrell, Frank E
Francis, Darrel P
Al-Lamee, Rasha K
Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app
title Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app
title_full Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app
title_fullStr Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app
title_full_unstemmed Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app
title_short Daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app
title_sort daily angina documentation versus subsequent recall: development of a symptom smartphone app
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac015
work_keys_str_mv AT nowbaralexandran dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT howardjamesp dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT shunshinmatthewj dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT rajkumarchristopher dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT foleymichael dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT basuarunima dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT goelakshit dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT patelsapna dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT adnanahmer dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT beattiecatherinej dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT keeblethomasr dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT sohaibafzal dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT collierdavid dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT mcveighpatrick dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT harrellfranke dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT francisdarrelp dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp
AT allameerashak dailyanginadocumentationversussubsequentrecalldevelopmentofasymptomsmartphoneapp