Cargando…

Increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study

AIMS: The relative impact of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and impaired left atrial (LA) function on cardiovascular haemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is largely unknown. We performed virtual patient simulations to elucidate the relative effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Loon, Tim, Knackstedt, Christian, Cornelussen, Richard, Reesink, Koen D, Brunner La Rocca, Hans-Peter, Delhaas, Tammo, van Empel, Vanessa, Lumens, Joost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaa009
_version_ 1784840803989848064
author van Loon, Tim
Knackstedt, Christian
Cornelussen, Richard
Reesink, Koen D
Brunner La Rocca, Hans-Peter
Delhaas, Tammo
van Empel, Vanessa
Lumens, Joost
author_facet van Loon, Tim
Knackstedt, Christian
Cornelussen, Richard
Reesink, Koen D
Brunner La Rocca, Hans-Peter
Delhaas, Tammo
van Empel, Vanessa
Lumens, Joost
author_sort van Loon, Tim
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The relative impact of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and impaired left atrial (LA) function on cardiovascular haemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is largely unknown. We performed virtual patient simulations to elucidate the relative effects of these factors on haemodynamics at rest and during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CircAdapt cardiovascular system model was used to simulate cardiac haemodynamics in wide ranges of impaired LV relaxation function, increased LV passive stiffness, and impaired LA function. Simulations showed that LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was preserved (>50%), despite these changes in LV and LA function. Impairment of LV relaxation function decreased E/A ratio and mildly increased LV filling pressure at rest. Increased LV passive stiffness resulted in increased E/A ratio, LA dilation and markedly elevated LV filling pressure. Impairment of LA function increased E/A ratio and LV filling pressure, explaining inconsistent grading of LVDD using echocardiographic indices. Exercise simulations showed that increased LV passive stiffness exerts a stronger exercise-limiting effect than impaired LV relaxation function does, especially with impaired LA function. CONCLUSION: The CircAdapt model enabled realistic simulation of virtual HFpEF patients, covering a wide spectrum of LVDD and related limitations of cardiac exercise performance, all with preserved resting LVEF. Simulations suggest that increased LV passive stiffness, more than impaired relaxation function, reduces exercise tolerance, especially when LA function is impaired. In future studies, the CircAdapt model can serve as a valuable platform for patient-specific simulations to identify the disease substrate(s) underlying the individual HFpEF patient’s cardiovascular phenotype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9707905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97079052023-01-27 Increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study van Loon, Tim Knackstedt, Christian Cornelussen, Richard Reesink, Koen D Brunner La Rocca, Hans-Peter Delhaas, Tammo van Empel, Vanessa Lumens, Joost Eur Heart J Digit Health Original Articles AIMS: The relative impact of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and impaired left atrial (LA) function on cardiovascular haemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is largely unknown. We performed virtual patient simulations to elucidate the relative effects of these factors on haemodynamics at rest and during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CircAdapt cardiovascular system model was used to simulate cardiac haemodynamics in wide ranges of impaired LV relaxation function, increased LV passive stiffness, and impaired LA function. Simulations showed that LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was preserved (>50%), despite these changes in LV and LA function. Impairment of LV relaxation function decreased E/A ratio and mildly increased LV filling pressure at rest. Increased LV passive stiffness resulted in increased E/A ratio, LA dilation and markedly elevated LV filling pressure. Impairment of LA function increased E/A ratio and LV filling pressure, explaining inconsistent grading of LVDD using echocardiographic indices. Exercise simulations showed that increased LV passive stiffness exerts a stronger exercise-limiting effect than impaired LV relaxation function does, especially with impaired LA function. CONCLUSION: The CircAdapt model enabled realistic simulation of virtual HFpEF patients, covering a wide spectrum of LVDD and related limitations of cardiac exercise performance, all with preserved resting LVEF. Simulations suggest that increased LV passive stiffness, more than impaired relaxation function, reduces exercise tolerance, especially when LA function is impaired. In future studies, the CircAdapt model can serve as a valuable platform for patient-specific simulations to identify the disease substrate(s) underlying the individual HFpEF patient’s cardiovascular phenotype. Oxford University Press 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9707905/ /pubmed/36713963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaa009 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
van Loon, Tim
Knackstedt, Christian
Cornelussen, Richard
Reesink, Koen D
Brunner La Rocca, Hans-Peter
Delhaas, Tammo
van Empel, Vanessa
Lumens, Joost
Increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study
title Increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study
title_full Increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study
title_fullStr Increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study
title_full_unstemmed Increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study
title_short Increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study
title_sort increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaa009
work_keys_str_mv AT vanloontim increasedmyocardialstiffnessmorethanimpairedrelaxationfunctionlimitscardiacperformanceduringexerciseinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionavirtualpatientstudy
AT knackstedtchristian increasedmyocardialstiffnessmorethanimpairedrelaxationfunctionlimitscardiacperformanceduringexerciseinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionavirtualpatientstudy
AT cornelussenrichard increasedmyocardialstiffnessmorethanimpairedrelaxationfunctionlimitscardiacperformanceduringexerciseinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionavirtualpatientstudy
AT reesinkkoend increasedmyocardialstiffnessmorethanimpairedrelaxationfunctionlimitscardiacperformanceduringexerciseinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionavirtualpatientstudy
AT brunnerlaroccahanspeter increasedmyocardialstiffnessmorethanimpairedrelaxationfunctionlimitscardiacperformanceduringexerciseinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionavirtualpatientstudy
AT delhaastammo increasedmyocardialstiffnessmorethanimpairedrelaxationfunctionlimitscardiacperformanceduringexerciseinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionavirtualpatientstudy
AT vanempelvanessa increasedmyocardialstiffnessmorethanimpairedrelaxationfunctionlimitscardiacperformanceduringexerciseinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionavirtualpatientstudy
AT lumensjoost increasedmyocardialstiffnessmorethanimpairedrelaxationfunctionlimitscardiacperformanceduringexerciseinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionavirtualpatientstudy